Philadelphia, United States Last checked

University of Pennsylvania

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional

AI use depends on the instructor and assignment. Penn has no standardized student AI-use policy; without other guidance, treat AI as assistance from another person. Wharton Academy examples apply only to that program and require instructor permission.

Official source ↗

Exams

Not established

No uniform university-wide AI exam permission was established. Follow the specific assessment rules; Wharton Academy expressly prohibits AI cheating in its exams and tests. Tool availability grants no exam permission.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Guidance; specific rules may apply

Community guidance directs transparency and disclosure, while stating it is not a final policy. Instructors may impose specific citation/disclosure requirements; Wharton Academy treats uncredited AI work as plagiarism.

Official source ↗

Privacy & sensitive data

Restricted in stated scope

Protect student, patient and research data. Unlicensed tools must not receive identifiable student information; student work requires permission even if anonymized. Do not require personal information or IP in unlicensed tools. Licensed-tool data conditions differ.

Official source ↗

Available institutional tools

Conditional

Institutional tools have product-specific audience, account, cost and data conditions. PennChat requires PennKey and campus/VPN access; verify current entitlements with IT. Tool access is separate from assessment permission.

Official source ↗

Research & publication

Restricted in stated scope

Consult department leadership and discipline publication standards about AI authorship. Research-participant data requires appropriate consent and prior IRB approval; data/IP safeguards and Penn Center for Innovation consultation apply.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Restricted in stated scope

Course rules determine unauthorized AI assistance. Wharton Academy has its own restrictions. CETLI advises discussing suspected misuse with students and consulting CSA; it says not to upload work into AI detectors and rejects their accuracy as misconduct evidence. Formal hearing/appeal procedures remain a gap.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Guidance; specific rules may apply

Instructors set and communicate course/assignment expectations. Unlicensed tools must not require student personal information or IP; consider licensed tools for mandatory coursework. Investigate suspected misuse through conversation and appropriate consultation.

Official source ↗

Security & procurement

Restricted in stated scope

Moderate/high-risk data involves Privacy Office review and Information Security consultation coordinated by Procurement; IP involves Penn Center for Innovation. University business AI processes should have oversight and output verification.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check the instructor’s rules for this course and assignment.
    Site advice
  • Disclose AI assistance under the applicable course rules.
    Site advice
  • Check the tool’s account, data and access conditions.
    Site advice

Don’t

  • Do not enter identifiable student information into unlicensed AI tools.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not require student personal information or IP in an unlicensed AI tool.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Wharton Academy: do not submit AI answers as your own or use AI to cheat.
    Requirement in this scope

AI use questioned?

University of Pennsylvania

Course, assignment, data and Wharton Academy conditions have distinct scopes. Tool access is not assessment permission.

Investigation & response

If instructors suspect AI use that violates their course policy, CETLI advises discussing the student's drafting and reasoning process. Instructors may consult the Center for Community Standards & Accountability, which handles academic integrity violations, whether or not they intend to refer the student for further investigation.

Original evidence and scope

If instructors suspect AI use that violates their course policy, CETLI advises discussing the student's drafting and reasoning process. Instructors may consult the Center for Community Standards & Accountability, which handles academic integrity violations, whether or not they intend to refer the student for further investigation.

cl-upenn-cetli-investigation-conversation-20261016
In other cases, student AI use may not be as clear. Often, faculty suspect a student has used AI if the language in their writing is bland or vague, but sometimes those qualities reflect the student’s own work. If you suspect a student has used AI in a way that violates your course policy, have a conversation with the student. You can begin the conversation with questions or statements like: I’m interested in understanding how you reached this conclusion. Can you talk to me about the process you used to draft this? How did you think about the organization of your work? You may discuss suspected student misuse of AI with the Center for Community Standards & Accountability

FAQ > suspected inappropriate AI use; conversation and CSA consultation; character chunk 0; extracted text lines 359–365

Official university source ↗
, which handles academic integrity violations. Their staff can consult with you about your concerns and help you plan next steps, whether or not you intend to refer the student for further investigation.

FAQ > suspected inappropriate AI use; conversation and CSA consultation; character chunk 680; extracted text lines 365–365

Official university source ↗

CETLI tells instructors not to upload student work into an AI detector in all cases. It states that uploading without consent violates FERPA and Penn privacy policies, and that detectors are not accurate enough to be treated as evidence of misconduct because of frequent bias.

Original evidence and scope

CETLI tells instructors not to upload student work into an AI detector in all cases. It states that uploading without consent violates FERPA and Penn privacy policies, and that detectors are not accurate enough to be treated as evidence of misconduct because of frequent bias.

cl-upenn-cetli-ai-detector-ban-20260919
In all cases, you should not upload the student’s work into an “AI detector.” Uploading a student’s work without their consent is a violation of FERPA and Penn’s privacy policies. These tools are also not accurate enough to be treated as evidence of misconduct as they exhibit frequent bias.

FAQ > suspected inappropriate AI use; character chunk 0; extracted text lines 366–373

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

  • ChatGPT EduInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Faculty/staff contact IT Support Provider; student access may be course/research-funded.

  • Claude AnthropicInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Contact local IT; Low/Moderate Risk Data only, with listed sensitive-data exclusions.

  • Microsoft Copilot Chat (Basic)Institutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Self-service with a University account; school-managed offerings may differ.

  • Microsoft M365 Copilot (Premium)Institutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Faculty/staff contact IT Support Provider.

  • Gemini for Google WorkspaceInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Some faculty/staff at ASC, SEAS and Wharton only; contact IT.

  • Google Gemini NotebookInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Some faculty/staff at ASC, SEAS and Wharton only; contact IT.

  • Grammarly ProInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Contact local IT support provider; CETLI lists FERPA and HIPAA data uses.

  • PennChatInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    PennKey on campus or VPN; tool-specific data limits apply.

  • Snowflake Data Analytics Platform & ConsultingInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Contact ISC Support Provider; excludes HIPAA-protected data, SSNs and credit cards.

  • Adobe FireflyInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Log in with PennKey; CETLI lists FERPA educational records.

  • OpenEvidenceInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    PSOM users only; Penn Medicine credentials; CETLI lists FERPA/HIPAA data.

  • Zoom AI CompanionInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Enable AI Companion in Zoom settings; CETLI lists FERPA educational records.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 4

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Exams · 11 more topics · Records involved: 35 (31 corrected / adjusted · 4 added)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  3. Record addition

    Ai Tool Treatment · Records involved: 1 (1 added)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

35

Official sources

6 official URLs; 6 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Penn Generative AI Tools & Resources

isc.upenn.edu

University official source

isc.upenn.edu

Hash and captured version

Penn Generative AI Tools & Resources · 2026-10-16T13:24:27.591751Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

6486198094b3c542eec6856a0236704f04c725121b9bb2a156ca3a5232a70344

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Penn AI Tools and Policies

cetli.upenn.edu

University official source

cetli.upenn.edu

Hash and captured version

Penn AI Tools and Policies · 2026-10-16T13:24:29.672022Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

fd62df3d3006cf7b1f768b9c44b8fc881375ead6085c8114dcf57f2272df6363

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Statement on Guidance for the University of Pennsylvania Community on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

isc.upenn.edu

University official source

isc.upenn.edu

Hash and captured version

Statement on Guidance for the University of Pennsylvania Community on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence · 2026-10-16T13:24:27.614170Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3a7089b53406b330c8b7e55b5441be3ee039013abc4fe472e83dbb7b7aa91ea6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI & Your Teaching

cetli.upenn.edu

University official source

cetli.upenn.edu

Hash and captured version

Generative AI & Your Teaching · 2026-10-16T13:24:29.090602Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

47bcb206e1a80cb362cddf216feeb7c3d736b6f67e1f5ad742d8935b3e46d681

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Creating AI Policies

cetli.upenn.edu

University official source

cetli.upenn.edu

Hash and captured version

Creating AI Policies · 2026-10-16T13:25:45.378102Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

01b5064acb726653d2109a4449f3328bcfe3560798491cec25b0e060e3685070

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

AI Policy - Wharton Academy

academy.wharton.upenn.edu

University official source

academy.wharton.upenn.edu

Hash and captured version

AI Policy - Wharton Academy · 2026-10-16T13:24:27.359253Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

31346c43ca701f09b5a43c3fb915fc60883e38a5522a52e83e1061b3ea27028e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
upenn-v6-20261016
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

          Current reviewed JSON
          Questions students ask

          Questions students ask

          Can I use AI for my coursework?

          AI use depends on the instructor and assignment. Penn has no standardized student AI-use policy; without other guidance, treat AI as assistance from another person. Wharton Academy examples apply only to that program and require instructor permission.

          View evidence →
          Do I need to disclose AI use?

          Community guidance directs transparency and disclosure, while stating it is not a final policy. Instructors may impose specific citation/disclosure requirements; Wharton Academy treats uncredited AI work as plagiarism.

          View evidence →
          Can I upload sensitive data?

          Protect student, patient and research data. Unlicensed tools must not receive identifiable student information; student work requires permission even if anonymized. Do not require personal information or IP in unlicensed tools. Licensed-tool data conditions differ.

          View evidence →
          Which tools can I access?

          Institutional tools have product-specific audience, account, cost and data conditions. PennChat requires PennKey and campus/VPN access; verify current entitlements with IT. Tool access is separate from assessment permission.

          View evidence →
          What are the examination rules?

          No uniform university-wide AI exam permission was established. Follow the specific assessment rules; Wharton Academy expressly prohibits AI cheating in its exams and tests. Tool availability grants no exam permission.

          View evidence →
          What rules apply to research and publication?

          Consult department leadership and discipline publication standards about AI authorship. Research-participant data requires appropriate consent and prior IRB approval; data/IP safeguards and Penn Center for Innovation consultation apply.

          View evidence →
          What counts as academic misconduct?

          Course rules determine unauthorized AI assistance. Wharton Academy has its own restrictions. CETLI advises discussing suspected misuse with students and consulting CSA; it says not to upload work into AI detectors and rejects their accuracy as misconduct evidence. Formal hearing/appeal procedures remain a gap.

          View evidence →
          What guidance applies to teaching?

          Instructors set and communicate course/assignment expectations. Unlicensed tools must not require student personal information or IP; consider licensed tools for mandatory coursework. Investigate suspected misuse through conversation and appropriate consultation.

          View evidence →
          What security and procurement requirements apply?

          Moderate/high-risk data involves Privacy Office review and Information Security consultation coordinated by Procurement; IP involves Penn Center for Innovation. University business AI processes should have oversight and output verification.

          View evidence →
          When was this record checked?

          Record checked:

          Record version →
          Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
          Where can I read the full evidence?

          35 · Full policy evidence

          Full policy evidence →