University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Milan, Italy Last checked

Politecnico di Milano

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?Check the applicable scopeDo I need to disclose AI use?Check the applicable scopeCan I upload sensitive data?Check the applicable scopeWhich tools can I access?Check the applicable scope
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Check the applicable scope

Teacher authorization is expressly specified for GSoM; no university-wide AI coursework permission proven.

Official source ↗

Exams

Check the applicable scope

GSoM exam AI use depends on teacher permission; university rules separately prohibit cheating and unauthorized tools.

Official source ↗

AI disclosure

Check the applicable scope

For allowed GSoM exam AI use, document where and how AI was used, prompts and replies.

Official source ↗

Privacy & data

Check the applicable scope

ICT Article 39 prohibits specified sensitive inputs to externally hosted AI and warns about third-party visibility and recording.

Official source ↗

Approved tools

Check the applicable scope

My Learning Talk is a course-focused institutional learning project, not general exam authorization.

Official source ↗

Research & publication

Check the applicable scope

General ethical and lawful AI use applies; thesis-specific disclosure, authorship and publisher rules not verified.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Check the applicable scope

Exam cheating and unauthorized tools are prohibited; no direct AI-specific blanket offense inferred.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Check the applicable scope

An effective July 2026 AI teaching-support decree exists in the official index; its operative clauses remain unverified.

Official source ↗

Security & procurement

Check the applicable scope

ICT rules restrict externally hosted AI data inputs; staff guidelines and procurement controls remain unverified.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Follow course teacher AI authorization in GSoM lessons and exams.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Document prompts and responses for authorized GSoM exam AI use.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Treat commercial AI inputs as potentially visible and recorded by third parties.
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Do not submit listed sensitive material to AI hosted outside the University.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not use unauthorized tools during examinations.
    Requirement in this scope
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

Politecnico di Milano

Scope separation required: Graduate School of Management (GSoM) GenAI rules and exam-retake sanctions apply to GSoM only; University ICT Regulation Art. 39 restricts sensitive inputs to externally hosted AI across the university; and the July 2026 AI teaching-support decree is listed in the official index with operative text still unverified.

Investigation & response

Under the University Student Disciplinary Regulations (Art. 5 simplified route), the student receives notice of the hearing at least 10 days in advance and may be assisted by a trusted person.

Original evidence and scope

Under the University Student Disciplinary Regulations (Art. 5 simplified route), the student receives notice of the hearing at least 10 days in advance and may be assisted by a trusted person.

academic_integrity:draft-procedure-1

University Student Disciplinary Regulations Article 5 provides hearing notice at least 10 days in advance and trusted-person assistance. Separately, the retained GSoM sanctions excerpt permits repeating the directly related exam at most once; it does not establish the claimed Course Director or second-warning steps.

During exams or other forms of assessment (including the final exam), it is strictly forbidden to cheat, use unauthorized tools, communicate with other candidates and/or other individuals

Art.3(1), English translation; SHA-256 identifies this retained UTF-8 excerpt, not raw HTML/PDF; physical page and original offsets unavailable.

Official university source ↗
the date of the hearing, giving at least 10 days' notice, and specifying that the student may be assisted by a trusted person;

Art.5(2)(c), PDF physical page 5, printed p.5; SHA-256 identifies this retained UTF-8 excerpt, not raw HTML/PDF; physical page and original offsets unavailable.

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

The student may repeat the exam - to which the breach is directly related - once at most;

Original evidence and scope

The student may repeat the exam - to which the breach is directly related - once at most;

academic_integrity:e-gsom-sanction

University Student Disciplinary Regulations Article 5 provides hearing notice at least 10 days in advance and trusted-person assistance. Separately, the retained GSoM sanctions excerpt permits repeating the directly related exam at most once; it does not establish the claimed Course Director or second-warning steps.

The student may repeat the exam - to which the breach is directly related - once at most;

§5.2 sanctions; SHA-256 identifies this retained UTF-8 excerpt, not raw HTML/PDF; physical page and original offsets unavailable.

Official university source ↗

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

My Learning Talk @Polimi

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

1

Historical and pending public Claims (3)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-politecnico-di-milano-institutional-ai-service-376 · excluded_pending_review

MLT participating courses

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (VERIFIED: 已核实课程范围内的校方学习工具，不能推导全体学生账号或考试许可。).

Record history

claim-polimi-commercial-ai-data-risk · excluded_pending_review

University ICT regulation

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (VERIFIED: 第39条风险告知条款确认，不能据此声称零留存或普遍禁用。).

Record history

claim-polimi-ai-principles · excluded_pending_review

University ICT regulation

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (VERIFIED: 第38条是一般原则，不直接授予作业或考试许可。).

Record history

Official sources

2 official URLs; 2 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

My Learning Talk @Polimi - AI tool for personalized, autonomous and transdisciplinary learning

www.mlt.polimi.it

University official source

mlt.polimi.it

Hash and captured version

My Learning Talk @Polimi - AI tool for personalized, autonomous and transdisciplinary learning · 2026-07-15T23:35:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

989ddd6ed3dbd1e184560e857ce379059206f0cf38057cba5d5094f2727c1ec2

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Regolamento del Politecnico di Milano in materia di trattamento dei dati personali e della sicurezza ICT

www.normativa.polimi.it

University official source

normativa.polimi.it

Hash and captured version

Regolamento del Politecnico di Milano in materia di trattamento dei dati personali e della sicurezza ICT · 2026-05-14T02:38:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

dbe08ea76543489ee36e16e84154af62b8b8a68a69ead6aa97f49a93efa4d31e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs91-100-v6-presentation-r1-20261026
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
  • 2026-07 teaching-support decree full provisions
  • authoritative Italian disciplinary regulation and amendments
  • policy-relevant PDF bytes and SHA256
  • all original historical enforcement records
  • complete raw public JSON/tools JSON
  • complete V6 projection and interaction checks
  • thesis-specific research provisions
  • privacy retention of generative AI products
  • Full raw HTML/PDF source bytes were not closed-loop archived in the research package; SHA-256 hashes on topic excerpts identify UTF-8 excerpt text only.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Teacher authorization is expressly specified for GSoM; no university-wide AI coursework permission proven.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        For allowed GSoM exam AI use, document where and how AI was used, prompts and replies.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        ICT Article 39 prohibits specified sensitive inputs to externally hosted AI and warns about third-party visibility and recording.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        My Learning Talk is a course-focused institutional learning project, not general exam authorization.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        GSoM exam AI use depends on teacher permission; university rules separately prohibit cheating and unauthorized tools.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        General ethical and lawful AI use applies; thesis-specific disclosure, authorship and publisher rules not verified.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Exam cheating and unauthorized tools are prohibited; no direct AI-specific blanket offense inferred.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        An effective July 2026 AI teaching-support decree exists in the official index; its operative clauses remain unverified.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        ICT rules restrict externally hosted AI data inputs; staff guidelines and procurement controls remain unverified.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        4 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        Politecnico di Milano AI Policy