變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
4 條當前主張；2 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 University of Belgrade。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄：4。
The Faculty of Organizational Sciences journal AI policy requires authors to disclose generative AI use in both the cover letter and a manuscript statement, forbids authors from including personal, confidential, or proprietary material in prompts, and says GAI must not be used to generate peer-review reports.
The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance lists prohibited generative AI uses including academic-integrity violations, generating or spreading false content, copyright violations, and entering business or official secrets or other sensitive content into prompts.
The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance states that generative AI use is permitted only with respect for academic integrity principles, copyright and intellectual property, personal-data protection, ethical principles, and confidentiality obligations.
The University of Belgrade Faculty of Organizational Sciences has general guidelines that frame responsible generative AI use for students, teaching staff, and non-teaching staff, aiming to improve academic integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in research, teaching, professional work, and administration.
官方來源紀錄：2。
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 20, 2026, 1:18 AM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 20, 2026, 1:18 AM
