University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

University of Belgrade

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Claims4Sources2
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Belgrade currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Belgrade current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # University of Belgrade AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance lists prohibited generative AI uses including academic-integrity violations, generating or spreading false content, copyright violations, and entering business or official secrets or other sensitive content into prompts.
3+Evidence (sr-Cyrl, 7657935218e6): У наставку се налази неискључива листа недозвољене употребе ГВИ: Кршење правила академског интегритета ... Генерисање и ширење лажних садржаја ... Кршење ауторских права ... Уношење у промпт било којих података или садржаја који представљају пословну или службену тајну.
4+academic_integrity: The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance states that generative AI use is permitted only with respect for academic integrity principles, copyright and intellectual property, personal-data protection, ethical principles, and confidentiality obligations.
5+Evidence (sr-Cyrl, 7657935218e6): Коришћење ГВИ је дозвољено искључиво уз поштовање базичних принципа академског интегритета ... Приликом коришћења ГВИ мора се водити рачуна о правима грађана утврђеним Законом о заштити података о личности (2018).
6+research: The Faculty of Organizational Sciences journal AI policy requires authors to disclose generative AI use in both the cover letter and a manuscript statement, forbids authors from including personal, confidential, or proprietary material in prompts, and says GAI must not be used to generate peer-review reports.
7+Evidence (en, 7a558ed212fa): Authors must clearly disclose any use of GAI in the cover letter, and a statement at the end of the manuscript ... Authors must not include personal data, confidential information, or proprietary materials in prompts used with GAI tools. GAI must not be used to generate peer-review reports.
8+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Belgrade Faculty of Organizational Sciences has general guidelines that frame responsible generative AI use for students, teaching staff, and non-teaching staff, aiming to improve academic integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in research, teaching, professional work, and administration.
9+Evidence (sr-Cyrl, 7657935218e6): Смернице су развијене ради пружања оквира за одговорно коришћење ГВИ технологија код студената, наставног и ненаставног особља. Смернице имају за циљ да се унапреде академски интегритет, транспарентност и етичко понашање у истраживању, наставним пословима, стручним пословима и администрацији.

Claim changes

4 claim records

research

The Faculty of Organizational Sciences journal AI policy requires authors to disclose generative AI use in both the cover letter and a manuscript statement, forbids authors from including personal, confidential, or proprietary material in prompts, and says GAI must not be used to generate peer-review reports.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance lists prohibited generative AI uses including academic-integrity violations, generating or spreading false content, copyright violations, and entering business or official secrets or other sensitive content into prompts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagessr-Cyrl

academic_integrity

The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance states that generative AI use is permitted only with respect for academic integrity principles, copyright and intellectual property, personal-data protection, ethical principles, and confidentiality obligations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagessr-Cyrl

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Belgrade Faculty of Organizational Sciences has general guidelines that frame responsible generative AI use for students, teaching staff, and non-teaching staff, aiming to improve academic integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in research, teaching, professional work, and administration.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagessr-Cyrl

Source snapshots

2 source attributions

Опште смернице за коришћење генеративне вештачке интелигенције на Факултету организационих наука

official_guidance checked May 20, 2026

Snapshot hash
7657935218e68ec74779b11de5554561be05fcea5c98e3bcf3e9a963280e7b11