Policy presence
University of Belgrade has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Belgrade, Serbia
University of Belgrade
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of Belgrade has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Belgrade has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
University of Belgrade has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
University of Belgrade has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
University of Belgrade has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
University of Belgrade has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Named AI services
University of Belgrade has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Teaching guidance
University of Belgrade has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Belgrade has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance lists prohibited generative AI uses including academic-integrity violations, generating or spreading false content, copyright violations, and entering business or official secrets or other sensitive content into prompts.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_guidance_lists_prohibited_gai_uses
Original evidence
Evidence 1У наставку се налази неискључива листа недозвољене употребе ГВИ: Кршење правила академског интегритета ... Генерисање и ширење лажних садржаја ... Кршење ауторских права ... Уношење у промпт било којих података или садржаја који представљају пословну или службену тајну.
Localized display only
The guidance lists prohibited GAI uses including academic-integrity violations, generating and spreading false content, copyright violations, and entering business or official secrets into prompts.
Academic Integrity
The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance states that generative AI use is permitted only with respect for academic integrity principles, copyright and intellectual property, personal-data protection, ethical principles, and confidentiality obligations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: gai_permitted_only_with_integrity_privacy_confidentiality
Original evidence
Evidence 1Коришћење ГВИ је дозвољено искључиво уз поштовање базичних принципа академског интегритета ... Приликом коришћења ГВИ мора се водити рачуна о правима грађана утврђеним Законом о заштити података о личности (2018).
Localized display only
Generative AI use is permitted only with respect for basic academic-integrity principles; when using GAI, users must take account of personal-data protection rights.
Research
The Faculty of Organizational Sciences journal AI policy requires authors to disclose generative AI use in both the cover letter and a manuscript statement, forbids authors from including personal, confidential, or proprietary material in prompts, and says GAI must not be used to generate peer-review reports.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal_gai_disclosure_confidentiality_peer_review_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1Authors must clearly disclose any use of GAI in the cover letter, and a statement at the end of the manuscript ... Authors must not include personal data, confidential information, or proprietary materials in prompts used with GAI tools. GAI must not be used to generate peer-review reports.
Localized display only
Authors must disclose GAI use in the cover letter and manuscript statement, must not include personal or confidential material in prompts, and GAI must not generate peer-review reports.
Ai Tool Treatment
The University of Belgrade Faculty of Organizational Sciences has general guidelines that frame responsible generative AI use for students, teaching staff, and non-teaching staff, aiming to improve academic integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in research, teaching, professional work, and administration.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_guidance_responsible_gai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Смернице су развијене ради пружања оквира за одговорно коришћење ГВИ технологија код студената, наставног и ненаставног особља. Смернице имају за циљ да се унапреде академски интегритет, транспарентност и етичко понашање у истраживању, наставним пословима, стручним пословима и администрацији.
Localized display only
The guidelines provide a framework for responsible generative AI use by students, teaching staff, and non-teaching staff, aiming to improve academic integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in research, teaching, professional work, and administration.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
management.fon.bg.ac.rs
Опште смернице за коришћење генеративне вештачке интелигенције на Факултету организационих наука
fon.bg.ac.rs