University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Umeå, Sweden

Umea University

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =401UpdatedMay 16, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

6 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Umeå University's student cheating and plagiarism page warns that using AI or similar services in examination to produce text and submitting it as one's own without openly disclosing how the material was created can amount to attempted misleading.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: undisclosed_ai_exam_text_can_be_misleading

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Om du använder artificiell intelligens eller liknande tjänster i samband med examination ... utan att öppet redovisa hur materialet skapats, kan det innebära försök till vilseledande.

Localized display only

Using AI in examination to create submitted text without openly disclosing how it was created can be attempted misleading.

Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
b5705614…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Användande av artificiell intelligens

Security Review

Umeå University's IT strategy says university-wide AI services have undergone necessary controls, and that AI services should be managed like other IT services under the university's system or cloud-service acquisition instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: ai_services_controls_and_acquisition_requirements

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
De AI-tjänster som erbjuds som universitetsgemensamma tjänst har genomgått alla nödvändiga kontroller ... En AI-tjänst ska hanteras i enlighet med andra IT-tjänster

Localized display only

University-wide AI services have undergone necessary controls; an AI service shall be managed in line with other IT services.

Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
129a5b5a…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
3.5 Användande av AI-tjänster

Teaching

Umeå University's UPL has initiated a three-year AI for learning initiative intended to build a university-wide platform for knowledge development, exchange of experience, and collegial learning.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: three_year_ai_for_learning_platform

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Satsningen ska resultera i en universitetsövergripande plattform för kunskapsutveckling, erfarenhetsutbyte och kollegialt lärande.

Localized display only

The initiative is intended to result in a university-wide platform for knowledge development, exchange of experience, and collegial learning.

Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
08246871…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Vad är AI för lärande?

Academic Integrity

Umeå University's AI and examination work area is developing principles, examples, and working methods for sustainable examination practice, including transparent and responsible use of AI as a learning tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: ai_examination_principles_under_development

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Arbetet syftar till att bidra till en hållbar utveckling av examinationspraktik vid Umeå universitet. Det handlar om att ta fram principer, exempel och arbetssätt som synliggör studenters faktiska kunnande

Localized display only

The work aims to support sustainable examination practice by developing principles, examples, and working methods.

Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
22e6e718…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
När AI förändrar villkoren för bedömning och lärande

Teaching

Umeå University's UPL academic-writing work area frames generative AI as both a possible support for students' writing and a source of challenges around metacognition, dependence on language models, and academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: academic_writing_ai_support_and_integrity_challenges

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI‑verktyg som exempelvis språkmodeller kan stärka studenters skrivförmåga ... Samtidigt framträder viktiga utmaningar kopplade till metakognition, alltför stort beroende av språkmodellerna och frågor om akademisk integritet.

Localized display only

The page says AI tools can support writing but also raise challenges around metacognition, dependence, and academic integrity.

Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
becc00c3…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Akademiskt skrivande i en tid av generativ AI

Teaching

Umeå University's UPL AI and teaching page says the work area focuses on teachers' didactic choices and professional judgment, including how AI is understood, valued, used, or deliberately not used in relation to teaching purposes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence80%

Normalized value: teacher_didactic_decisions_ai

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Avgörande är hur tekniken förstås, värderas och används, eller medvetet väljs bort, i relation till undervisningens syften och sammanhang.

Localized display only

The page says the decisive issue is how AI is understood, valued, used, or deliberately not used in relation to teaching purposes.

Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
9ad7c8af…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
AI i undervisningspraktiken

Source record

Official sources

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence91%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Umea University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/umea-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log