Policy presence
Umea University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Umeå, Sweden
Umea University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Umea University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Umea University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Umea University has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Umea University has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Umea University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Umea University has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Umea University has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: undisclosed_ai_exam_text_can_be_misleading
Original evidence
Evidence 1Om du använder artificiell intelligens eller liknande tjänster i samband med examination ... utan att öppet redovisa hur materialet skapats, kan det innebära försök till vilseledande.
Localized display only
Using AI in examination to create submitted text without openly disclosing how it was created can be attempted misleading.
Security Review
Normalized value: ai_services_controls_and_acquisition_requirements
Original evidence
Evidence 1De AI-tjänster som erbjuds som universitetsgemensamma tjänst har genomgått alla nödvändiga kontroller ... En AI-tjänst ska hanteras i enlighet med andra IT-tjänster
Localized display only
University-wide AI services have undergone necessary controls; an AI service shall be managed in line with other IT services.
Teaching
Normalized value: three_year_ai_for_learning_platform
Original evidence
Evidence 1Satsningen ska resultera i en universitetsövergripande plattform för kunskapsutveckling, erfarenhetsutbyte och kollegialt lärande.
Localized display only
The initiative is intended to result in a university-wide platform for knowledge development, exchange of experience, and collegial learning.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_examination_principles_under_development
Original evidence
Evidence 1Arbetet syftar till att bidra till en hållbar utveckling av examinationspraktik vid Umeå universitet. Det handlar om att ta fram principer, exempel och arbetssätt som synliggör studenters faktiska kunnande
Localized display only
The work aims to support sustainable examination practice by developing principles, examples, and working methods.
Teaching
Normalized value: academic_writing_ai_support_and_integrity_challenges
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI‑verktyg som exempelvis språkmodeller kan stärka studenters skrivförmåga ... Samtidigt framträder viktiga utmaningar kopplade till metakognition, alltför stort beroende av språkmodellerna och frågor om akademisk integritet.
Localized display only
The page says AI tools can support writing but also raise challenges around metacognition, dependence, and academic integrity.
Teaching
Normalized value: teacher_didactic_decisions_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Avgörande är hur tekniken förstås, värderas och används, eller medvetet väljs bort, i relation till undervisningens syften och sammanhang.
Localized display only
The page says the decisive issue is how AI is understood, valued, used, or deliberately not used in relation to teaching purposes.
0 machine or needs-review claim
6 source attribution
umu.se
umu.se
umu.se
umu.se
umu.se
umu.se