University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Beijing, China (Mainland) Last checked

Tsinghua University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?ConditionalDo I need to disclose AI use?Required in the stated scopeCan I upload sensitive data?Restricted in the stated scopeWhich tools can I access?Conditional
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional

Explore AI-assisted learning only within the course rules. The public news account forbids submitting copied or simply paraphrased AI output as academic work. Instructors set the permitted methods and extent; disciplinary findings and consequences remain case-specific.

Official source ↗

Exams

Insufficient public evidence

The reviewed public sources do not establish AI permission for a particular exam. General rules address unauthorized electronic-device retrieval and cheating; Xiaoda access grants no exam permission. Obtain the applicable exam instructions before using AI.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required in the stated scope

The reported compliance-and-integrity principle calls for disclosure under applicable rules. The follow-up interview identifies substantive AI contribution to an academic outcome as a trigger for clear, prominent marking or declaration in the form required by the university, unit or instructor.

Official source ↗

Privacy & sensitive data

Restricted in the stated scope

The public guiding-principles account prohibits using sensitive, classified or unauthorized data to train or drive AI models. A campus tool listing does not authorize sensitive-data entry; current retention and tenant settings were not verified.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Conditional

Xiaoda is an institutional student assistant. A dated September 2026 report states it opened to all undergraduate and graduate students in June 2025; an undated center page retains older pilot wording. Account entitlements and price were not tested. Access is separate from assessment or sensitive-data permission.

Official source ↗

Research & degree work

Restricted in the stated scope

For graduate theses and practical achievements, the public account prohibits replacing independent academic training and AI ghostwriting, plagiarism or fabrication; supervisors provide guidance and oversight. Research-misconduct investigation and degree non-conferral/revocation have distinct authorities, response rights and review routes. SIGS rules are unit-specific.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity & procedures

Restricted in the stated scope

Separate research investigation (15 working days for acceptance, five working days to form the group; normally three-month investigation/six-month overall handling, with suspension/extension rules), student discipline (five-working-day defense and ten-day expulsion-hearing request), student appeals (ten-day filing, normally fifteen-day review with possible fifteen-day extension), and degree review (thirty days after acceptance). These clocks and scopes are not interchangeable.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Source guidance

The public news account recommends that instructors determine AI methods and extent from teaching objectives, explain usage rules at the start of a course and remain responsible for AI-generated teaching materials. The full guiding-principles document and specific AI-grading/upload-consent rules were not obtained.

Official source ↗

Security & procurement

Insufficient public evidence

The guiding-principles account supplies a sensitive-data restriction; it does not establish a complete public procurement or security-approval workflow. No verified universal approval route was found in this bounded review.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check the course and exam instructions before using AI.
    Site advice
  • Declare substantive AI contributions as required for the task.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Use the response or review route that matches your decision; check its exact clock.
    Site advice

Don’t

  • Do not submit copied or simply paraphrased AI output as your academic work.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not use AI for thesis ghostwriting, plagiarism or fabrication.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not use sensitive, classified or unauthorized data to train or drive models.
    Requirement in this scope
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

Tsinghua University

Public reports of AI guiding principles; ordinary degree students for discipline; research-related activity for investigation; distinct degree-review and SIGS unit rules.

Investigation & response

The 2025 Academic Misconduct Investigation Measures apply to faculty, staff and students in academic research and related activities. They are not a universal procedure for every course-grade disagreement.

Original evidence and scope

The 2025 Academic Misconduct Investigation Measures apply to faculty, staff and students in academic research and related activities. They are not a universal procedure for every course-grade disagreement.

cl-tsinghua-research-investigation-scope

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二条 本办法适用于对学校师生员工在学术研究及相关活动中发生的违反学术研究行为准则、违背学术诚信的各类行为的调查认定相关工作。

Article 2; extracted text lines 239-239

Official university source ↗

For research-misconduct reports, the discipline planning office organizes preliminary verification and determines acceptance/registration within 15 working days, notifying the reporting unit or named reporter and explaining rejection in writing. Article 9 also lists grounds for non-acceptance.

Original evidence and scope

For research-misconduct reports, the discipline planning office organizes preliminary verification and determines acceptance/registration within 15 working days, notifying the reporting unit or named reporter and explaining rejection in writing. Article 9 also lists grounds for non-acceptance.

cl-tsinghua-research-investigation-entry

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第九条  对于通过举报获得的师生员工涉嫌存在学术不端行为的线索，学科办应当及时组织初步核实，在十五个工作日内明确是否受理立项并通知提供线索的单位或实名举报人等（以下统称实名举报人），不予受理立项的应当书面说明理由。对于具有以下情形之一的举报，可以不予受理立项：

Article 9, opening paragraph; extracted text lines 254-254

Official university source ↗

Within five working days after formal registration, the university academic committee forms an investigation group of at least five and the discipline planning office gives the investigated person written notice. This deadline is for constituting a research investigation, not a student appeal.

Original evidence and scope

Within five working days after formal registration, the university academic committee forms an investigation group of at least five and the discipline planning office gives the investigated person written notice. This deadline is for constituting a research investigation, not a student appeal.

cl-tsinghua-research-investigation-panel

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十条 正式立项后五个工作日内，学校学术委员会组建调查组开展调查，制定调查方案，明确调查内容、人员、方式、进度安排、保障措施、工作纪律等。调查组成员应当不少于五人，由学校学术委员会相关专项委员会或相关院系学术委员会委员担任。学科办应当书面告知被调查人已启动调查程序。

Article 10, opening paragraph; extracted text lines 262-262

Official university source ↗

Research fact-finding must protect the investigated person’s right to make a statement and verify the relevant facts, reasons and evidence.

Original evidence and scope

Research fact-finding must protect the investigated person’s right to make a statement and verify the relevant facts, reasons and evidence.

cl-tsinghua-research-response

University-wide, within the stated academic context

事实调查过程中应当保障被调查人陈述的权利，对有关事实、理由和证据进行核实。

Article 11; extracted text lines 266-266

Official university source ↗

Participants in academic-misconduct investigations and determinations must recuse themselves where their or relatives’ interests could affect fairness.

Original evidence and scope

Participants in academic-misconduct investigations and determinations must recuse themselves where their or relatives’ interests could affect fairness.

cl-tsinghua-research-recusal

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二十条 学术不端行为调查认定过程中应当严格执行回避制度。调查组和学术评议专家组成员、学校学术委员会委员（以下统称参与人员）本人及其亲属等与实名举报人或被举报人等存在可能影响公平公正调查认定的利害关系的，相关参与人员应当回避。

Article 20; extracted text lines 278-278

Official university source ↗

Research investigation, determination and handling should normally finish within six months of acceptance, including investigation within three months. Particularly complex cases or force majeure may justify an investigation extension approved by the academic committee chair, limited to six additional months.

Original evidence and scope

Research investigation, determination and handling should normally finish within six months of acceptance, including investigation within three months. Particularly complex cases or force majeure may justify an investigation extension approved by the academic committee chair, limited to six additional months.

cl-tsinghua-research-times

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十七条 对学术不端行为的调查认定处理工作原则上应当自受理之日起六个月内完成，其中调查工作原则上应当自受理之日起三个月内完成。 因特别复杂或不可抗力等原因导致在前款规定期限内不能完成调查工作的，经学校学术委员会主任同意可以延长调查期限，但延长时间不得超过六个月。

Article 17; extracted text lines 274-275

Official university source ↗

Research investigations may be suspended for missing key information or unavailable conditions; suspension time is excluded. Intellectual-property litigation affecting classification requires suspension and later resumption. Death ends that person’s investigation without ending other persons’ investigations.

Original evidence and scope

Research investigations may be suspended for missing key information or unavailable conditions; suspension time is excluded. Intellectual-property litigation affecting classification requires suspension and later resumption. Death ends that person’s investigation without ending other persons’ investigations.

cl-tsinghua-research-suspension

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十三条 调查中发现关键信息不充分或暂不具备调查条件的，可中止调查。中止调查的原因消除后，应当及时恢复调查，中止的时间不计入调查时限。出现知识产权等争议引发法律纠纷的，且该争议可能影响行为定性的，应当中止调查，待争议解决后重启调查。调查期间被调查人死亡的，终止对其调查，但不影响对涉及的其他被调查人的调查。

Article 13; extracted text lines 270-270

Official university source ↗

The Academic Affairs Office or Graduate School is responsible for student cases involving academic misconduct or learning discipline; other categories have different competent authorities. These disciplinary regulations cover ordinary undergraduate and graduate degree students, with the specified analogous application for non-degree professional graduate students.

Original evidence and scope

The Academic Affairs Office or Graduate School is responsible for student cases involving academic misconduct or learning discipline; other categories have different competent authorities. These disciplinary regulations cover ordinary undergraduate and graduate degree students, with the specified analogous application for non-degree professional graduate students.

cl-tsinghua-discipline-scope-authority

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十二条　主管机构 （一）涉及学术不端、违反学习纪律的，由教务处或者研究生院负责； （二）涉及违反住宿管理规定的，由学生公寓管理委员会负责； （三）涉及其他违法违纪行为的，由学生处或者研究生院负责。

Article 12; extracted text lines 273-276

Official university source ↗

In student discipline, the student’s unit conducts preliminary verification and decides within five working days whether to register handling or discipline, files with the competent university authority and reports back. This is separate from the 15-working-day research-investigation acceptance stage.

Original evidence and scope

In student discipline, the student’s unit conducts preliminary verification and decides within five working days whether to register handling or discipline, files with the competent university authority and reports back. This is separate from the 15-working-day research-investigation acceptance stage.

cl-tsinghua-discipline-entry

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第五条　涉嫌违纪学生所在院系负责对学生涉嫌违纪的行为进行初步核实，在五个工作日内作出是否予以立项处理或者处分的决定，并报学校主管机构备案，同时反馈给报告人或举报人。

Article 5, opening paragraph; extracted text lines 243-243

Official university source ↗

Before student discipline, the proposed-sanction notice must specify the sanction type, basis, term, facts and evidence, and the rights to statement and defense. Proposed expulsion also carries a hearing-request right; students may contest the notice.

Original evidence and scope

Before student discipline, the proposed-sanction notice must specify the sanction type, basis, term, facts and evidence, and the rights to statement and defense. Proposed expulsion also carries a hearing-request right; students may contest the notice.

cl-tsinghua-discipline-notice

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十五条　立项后，涉嫌违纪学生所在院系或者相应的主管机构负责调查取证，调查取证完成后由所在院系决策会议提出纪律处分建议，主管机构依据院系纪律处分建议及违纪事实形成拟处分意见，以学校拟处分告知书形式送达学生本人。 拟处分告知书应当告知拟给予的处分种类、依据、期限以及相关事实、证据，并告知学生享有陈述和申辩的权利，拟给予开除学籍处分的还应当告知学生享有申请召开听证会的权利。 第十六条　学生对拟处分告知书的相关内容有异议的，可以提出陈述、申辩，对拟给予开除学籍处分有异议的还可以申请召开听证会。

Articles 15–16; extracted text lines 279-281

Official university source ↗

After delivery of a proposed student-sanction notice, the student, guardian or authorized representative has five working days to request written or oral statement/defense; oral requests must be arranged within five working days. Proposed expulsion carries a written hearing-request deadline of ten days after receipt, subject to the stated waiver conditions.

Original evidence and scope

After delivery of a proposed student-sanction notice, the student, guardian or authorized representative has five working days to request written or oral statement/defense; oral requests must be arranged within five working days. Proposed expulsion carries a written hearing-request deadline of ten days after receipt, subject to the stated waiver conditions.

cl-tsinghua-discipline-defense

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十七条　学生（监护人或者委托代理人）对拟处分告知书相关内容有异议的，在拟处分告知书送达之日起五个工作日内，可以向学校主管机构提出书面或口头陈述、申辩请求。 学生（监护人或者委托代理人）请求进行口头陈述、申辩的，学校主管机构应当于请求提出之日起五个工作日内予以安排，并作好笔录。 第十八条　拟被给予开除学籍处分的学生有申请召开听证会的权利。 （一）拟被处分学生应当在收到拟处分告知书后的十日内向主管机构书面提出听证申请。逾期未提出听证申请，或者无正当理由未出席听证会的，视为放弃听证权利。 （二）拟被处分学生放弃听证权利的，不得再次提出听证申请。

Articles 17–18; extracted text lines 288-292

Official university source ↗

SIGS has its own Academic Misconduct Investigation Measures, effective 1 June 2026, applying to SIGS faculty, staff and students in academic research and related activities. Do not generalize its unit procedures to every Tsinghua school.

Original evidence and scope

SIGS has its own Academic Misconduct Investigation Measures, effective 1 June 2026, applying to SIGS faculty, staff and students in academic research and related activities. Do not generalize its unit procedures to every Tsinghua school.

cl-tsinghua-sigs-unit

Unit-specific: Shenzhen International Graduate School; research and related activities

第二条 本办法适用于对学院师生员工在学术研究及相关活动中发生的违反学术研究行为准则、违背学术诚信的各类行为的调查认定相关工作。

Article 2; SIGS only; extracted text lines 64-64

Official university source ↗

Within SIGS, the college academic committee coordinates investigations, its research office is the secretariat, and relevant secondary units verify cases. This is the SIGS division of responsibilities, distinct from the university discipline planning office.

Original evidence and scope

Within SIGS, the college academic committee coordinates investigations, its research office is the secretariat, and relevant secondary units verify cases. This is the SIGS division of responsibilities, distinct from the university discipline planning office.

cl-tsinghua-sigs-authority

Unit-specific: Shenzhen International Graduate School

第五条 学院学术委员会统筹协调学术不端行为调查认定相关工作。 第六条 科研处作为学院学术委员会秘书处具体负责学术不端行为调查认定的组织协调工作。 第七条 师生员工所在二级单位具体负责本单位相关学术不端行为调查核实等相关工作。

Articles 5–7; SIGS only; extracted text lines 75-77

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

The university academic committee determines whether conduct is academic misconduct and its gravity from the investigation report. The university then applies the relevant rules, nature and seriousness to handling or discipline; an AI-use allegation is not an automatic sanction.

Original evidence and scope

The university academic committee determines whether conduct is academic misconduct and its gravity from the investigation report. The university then applies the relevant rules, nature and seriousness to handling or discipline; an AI-use allegation is not an automatic sanction.

cl-tsinghua-research-decision

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十五条 学校学术委员会审定调查报告，根据调查报告依法依规认定被调查行为是否构成学术不端行为，并就学术不端行为认定其性质、情节（较轻、较重、严重或特别严重），形成认定结论。 第十六条 学校根据学校学术委员会形成的认定结论，结合行为性质和情节轻重，按照相关规定对学术不端行为责任人相应予以处理处分。

Articles 15–16; extracted text lines 272-273

Official university source ↗

For ordinary degree-program students, serious homework, laboratory-report or course-paper plagiarism, alteration of laboratory data, or other serious learning falsification can attract sanctions from warning through probation under Article 21. This general framework does not classify every use of AI as misconduct.

Original evidence and scope

For ordinary degree-program students, serious homework, laboratory-report or course-paper plagiarism, alteration of laboratory data, or other serious learning falsification can attract sanctions from warning through probation under Article 21. This general framework does not classify every use of AI as misconduct.

cl-tsinghua-course-discipline

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二十一条　有下列违反课程学习纪律情形之一的，给予警告以上、留校察看以下处分： （一）课程作业抄袭严重的； （二）实验报告抄袭严重或者篡改实验数据的； （三）期中、期末课程论文抄袭严重的； （四）在课程学习过程中严重弄虚作假的其他情形。

Article 21; extracted text lines 290-294

Official university source ↗

After university academic committee determination, Article 19 assigns demerit or above for specified academic misconduct, including plagiarism, fabrication and improper authorship; plagiarism, alteration or fabrication in degree theses or published research attracts probation or above. Article 20 assigns expulsion for serious such thesis/research misconduct or thesis ghostwriting/trading. These require the specified findings and procedure.

Original evidence and scope

After university academic committee determination, Article 19 assigns demerit or above for specified academic misconduct, including plagiarism, fabrication and improper authorship; plagiarism, alteration or fabrication in degree theses or published research attracts probation or above. Article 20 assigns expulsion for serious such thesis/research misconduct or thesis ghostwriting/trading. These require the specified findings and procedure.

cl-tsinghua-academic-sanctions

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十九条　经学校学术委员会认定，有下列学术不端行为之一的，给予记过以上处分： （一）剽窃、抄袭、侵占他人学术成果； （二）篡改他人研究成果； （三）伪造科研数据、资料、文献、注释，或者捏造事实、编造虚假研究成果； （四）未参加研究或创作而在研究成果、学术论文上署名，未经他人许可而不当使用他人署名，虚构合作者共同署名，或者多人共同完成研究而在成果中未注明他人工作、贡献； （五）在申报课题、成果、奖励和申请学位等过程中提供虚假学术信息； （六）买卖非学位论文、由他人代写或者为他人代写非学位论文； （七）其他学术不端行为。 其中，学位论文、公开发表的研究成果中有抄袭、篡改、伪造等情形的，给予留校察看以上处分。 第二十条　经学校学术委员会认定，有下列情形之一的，给予开除学籍处分： （一）学位论文、公开发表的研究成果中有抄袭、篡改、伪造等情形，情节严重的； （二）代写或者由他人代写学位论文、买卖学位论文的。

Articles 19–20; extracted text lines 278-289

Official university source ↗

For undergraduates under the published student-status regulations, violation of course-assessment discipline invalidates the assessment result, recorded as zero or F. This general consequence requires the relevant violation; it is not triggered by every use of AI.

Original evidence and scope

For undergraduates under the published student-status regulations, violation of course-assessment discipline invalidates the assessment result, recorded as zero or F. This general consequence requires the relevant violation; it is not triggered by every use of AI.

cl-tsinghua-undergrad-assessment-result

Undergraduates; course-assessment discipline

第二十五条 学生违反课程考核纪律的，该课程考核成绩无效（记0分或者F等级）。

Article 25; undergraduate regulations; extracted text lines 291-291

Official university source ↗

The undergraduate student-status regulations provide for lawful revocation of academic/degree certificates obtained through cheating, plagiarism or other academic misconduct or improper means, and the specified registration cancellation. Degree decisions also have the distinct 2026 degree-measures procedure.

Original evidence and scope

The undergraduate student-status regulations provide for lawful revocation of academic/degree certificates obtained through cheating, plagiarism or other academic misconduct or improper means, and the specified registration cancellation. Degree decisions also have the distinct 2026 degree-measures procedure.

cl-tsinghua-undergrad-certificates

Undergraduates; certificates obtained by the specified improper means

第四十九条 对违反国家招生规定取得入学资格或者学籍的，学校予以取消学籍，不发给学历证书、学位证书；已发的学历证书、学位证书，学校依法予以撤销。 对以作弊、剽窃、抄袭等学术不端行为或者其他不正当手段获得学历证书、学位证书的，学校依法予以撤销。 被撤销的学历证书、学位证书已注册的，学校予以注销并报教育行政部门宣布无效。

Article 49; undergraduate regulations; extracted text lines 349-351

Official university source ↗

General exam rules classify unauthorized electronic-device retrieval of exam-related materials during an exam, and the other listed carrying/copying behaviors, as cheating attracting demerit or above. This is not an AI-specific rule, not evidence of AI permission, and not an automatic sanction for any AI use.

Original evidence and scope

General exam rules classify unauthorized electronic-device retrieval of exam-related materials during an exam, and the other listed carrying/copying behaviors, as cheating attracting demerit or above. This is not an AI-specific rule, not evidence of AI permission, and not an automatic sanction for any AI use.

cl-tsinghua-exam-rules

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二十四条　有下列考试作弊情形之一的，给予记过以上处分： （一）未经考前允许，考试开始后在课桌、座位、身体等处有书籍、笔记、纸条或者文字等与考试内容相关资料，或者携带存储有与考试内容相关资料的电子设备的； （二）考试过程中，利用上厕所等机会在考场外偷看与考试内容相关的资料，或者携带与考试内容相关资料返回考场的； （三）考试过程中，擅自使用电子设备检索与考试内容相关资料的； （四）考试过程中抄袭与考试内容相关资料的； （五）其他携带、抄袭与考试内容相关资料的作弊情形。

Article 24; extracted text lines 309-314

Official university source ↗

General exam rules assign probation or above for the Article 25 categories involving obtaining or transmitting exam materials/answers or collaborative copying. Article 26 assigns expulsion for organizing cheating by three or more, impersonation, repeat cheating or other egregious cheating. Apply the actual facts and procedure, not a universal AI penalty.

Original evidence and scope

General exam rules assign probation or above for the Article 25 categories involving obtaining or transmitting exam materials/answers or collaborative copying. Article 26 assigns expulsion for organizing cheating by three or more, impersonation, repeat cheating or other egregious cheating. Apply the actual facts and procedure, not a universal AI penalty.

cl-tsinghua-exam-sanction-tiers

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二十五条　有下列考试作弊情形之一的，给予留校察看以上处分： （一）违法违规获得试卷、答卷或者故意隐匿、毁弃他人试卷、答卷的； （二）使用通讯设备或其他器材、物品等传接试题答案或者与考试内容相关资料的； （三）抄袭他人试题答案或者协助他人抄袭试题答案的； （四）考试过程中胁迫他人为自己抄袭提供方便的； （五）其他与他人共同实施抄袭试题答案或者传接与考试内容相关资料的作弊情形。 第二十六条　有下列考试作弊情形之一的，给予开除学籍处分： （一）参与组织实施三人以上作弊的； （二）代替他人或者让他人代替自己参加考试的； （三）再次考试作弊的； （四）其他情节恶劣的作弊情形。

Articles 25–26; extracted text lines 315-325

Official university source ↗

Demerit and lesser student sanctions are decided after leadership-office discussion; probation and expulsion require university affairs meeting determination after leadership-office discussion. Expulsion also requires prior legality review.

Original evidence and scope

Demerit and lesser student sanctions are decided after leadership-office discussion; probation and expulsion require university affairs meeting determination after leadership-office discussion. Expulsion also requires prior legality review.

cl-tsinghua-discipline-decision

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十七条　处分决定 （一）给予警告、严重警告或者记过处分，由学校主管领导主持的办公会（以下简称校领导办公会）讨论决定。 （二）给予留校察看或者开除学籍处分，经校领导办公会讨论后，由校务会议研究决定。给予开除学籍处分的，还应当事先进行合法性审查。 处分决定书应当送达学生本人。

Article 17; extracted text lines 282-285

Official university source ↗

For degree applicants/holders, a university degree committee resolution leads to non-conferral or revocation where the degree thesis or practical achievement is determined to involve ghostwriting, plagiarism, fabrication or the other listed grounds. Before a proposed decision, the subcommittee must notify the content, facts, reasons and basis and hear statement and defense.

Original evidence and scope

For degree applicants/holders, a university degree committee resolution leads to non-conferral or revocation where the degree thesis or practical achievement is determined to involve ghostwriting, plagiarism, fabrication or the other listed grounds. Before a proposed decision, the subcommittee must notify the content, facts, reasons and basis and hear statement and defense.

cl-tsinghua-degree-consequences

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二十三条  学位申请人、学位获得者在攻读相应学位过程中有下列情形之一的，经校学位委员会决议，学校不授予其学位或者撤销其学位： （一）学位论文或者实践成果被认定为存在代写、剽窃、伪造等学术不端行为的； （二）盗用、冒用他人身份，顶替他人取得的入学资格，或者以其他非法手段取得入学资格、毕业证书的； （三）攻读期间存在依法不应当授予学位的其他严重违法行为的。 第二十四条  学校拟作出不授予学位或者撤销学位决定的，由相应的学位分委员会告知学位申请人或者学位获得者拟作出决定的内容及事实、理由、依据，听取其陈述和申辩。

Articles 23–24; extracted text lines 280-284

Official university source ↗

Review & appeal

The student appeal measures apply to the listed university decisions on admission/student status, withdrawal, non-issuance of academic/degree certificates, and disciplinary sanctions. They do not establish a generic appeal deadline for an ordinary mark dispute.

Original evidence and scope

The student appeal measures apply to the listed university decisions on admission/student status, withdrawal, non-issuance of academic/degree certificates, and disciplinary sanctions. They do not establish a generic appeal deadline for an ordinary mark dispute.

cl-tsinghua-appeal-scope

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第三条 本办法所指的申诉，是指学生因不服学校作出的下列处理或处分决定所提起的校内申诉： （一）给予取消入学资格、取消学籍、退学、不颁发学历证书、不颁发学位证书处理； （二）给予警告、严重警告、记过、留校察看、开除学籍处分。

Article 3; extracted text lines 240-242

Official university source ↗

A student contesting a decision listed in Article 3 may submit a written internal appeal within ten days of delivery of the effective decision document. If justified reasons prevented timely filing, the student may file within ten days after those reasons end. These are application deadlines, not review-completion periods.

Original evidence and scope

A student contesting a decision listed in Article 3 may submit a written internal appeal within ten days of delivery of the effective decision document. If justified reasons prevented timely filing, the student may file within ten days after those reasons end. These are application deadlines, not review-completion periods.

cl-tsinghua-appeal-application

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十六条 学生对本办法第三条所规定的学校处理或者处分决定有异议的，在学校处理或者处分决定的生效文书送达之日起十日内，可以向学生申诉处理委员会提出书面申诉。 学生因正当理由未能在规定期限内提出申诉的，可以于正当理由结束之日起十日内，向学生申诉处理委员会提出书面申诉。

Article 16; extracted text lines 268-269

Official university source ↗

The appeal office notifies acceptance or reasoned refusal within three working days of submitted materials. Receipt of an appeal is calculated from confirmed acceptance. The original decision generally continues during appeal; the committee may recommend deferral where necessary.

Original evidence and scope

The appeal office notifies acceptance or reasoned refusal within three working days of submitted materials. Receipt of an appeal is calculated from confirmed acceptance. The original decision generally continues during appeal; the committee may recommend deferral where necessary.

cl-tsinghua-appeal-acceptance

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第十九条 学生申诉处理委员会办公室应当在学生提交申诉申请书面材料之日起三个工作日内，书面告知其学生申诉处理委员会是否予以受理。不予受理的，还应当书面说明理由。 第二十条 学生申诉处理委员会接到书面申诉的日期，以确认受理该申诉申请之日起计算。 第二十一条 申诉期间原处理或处分决定原则上不停止执行。学生申诉处理委员会认为必要的，可以建议学校暂缓执行。

Articles 19–21; extracted text lines 286-288

Official university source ↗

For an accepted internal student appeal, the committee normally makes a written review conclusion within fifteen days of receipt; complex cases may extend fifteen days with the chair’s approval. Receipt is defined by Article 20 as confirmed acceptance. This is not the filing deadline.

Original evidence and scope

For an accepted internal student appeal, the committee normally makes a written review conclusion within fifteen days of receipt; complex cases may extend fifteen days with the chair’s approval. Receipt is defined by Article 20 as confirmed acceptance. This is not the filing deadline.

cl-tsinghua-appeal-review

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二十四条 学生申诉处理委员会在接到学生书面申诉之日起十五日内，根据实际情况作出相应的书面复查结论： （一）同意原处理或处分决定； （二）认为原处理或处分决定所依据的事实认定不清、发现新的重要证据、处理或处分依据错误或在程序上有错误，可能对原处理或处分决定有实质性影响，建议原处理或处分机构重新研究决定。 因情况复杂不能在规定限期内作出结论的，经学生申诉处理委员会主任批准，限期可延长十五日。

Article 24; extracted text lines 292-295

Official university source ↗

For periods under the student appeal measures, the starting day is not counted and time in transit is excluded. Do not convert the stated day periods into working days.

Original evidence and scope

For periods under the student appeal measures, the starting day is not counted and time in transit is excluded. Do not convert the stated day periods into working days.

cl-tsinghua-appeal-clock

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第三十条 本办法中的有关期间，开始当日不计算在期间内，期间不包括在途时间。

Article 30; extracted text lines 319-319

Official university source ↗

A degree applicant contesting an academic evaluation in expert review, defense or achievement recognition may seek written academic review from the relevant degree subcommittee. It must reorganize expert review and decide within thirty days of accepting the application; that review decision is final. The text does not supply a general thirty-day filing window.

Original evidence and scope

A degree applicant contesting an academic evaluation in expert review, defense or achievement recognition may seek written academic review from the relevant degree subcommittee. It must reorganize expert review and decide within thirty days of accepting the application; that review decision is final. The text does not supply a general thirty-day filing window.

cl-tsinghua-degree-academic-review

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二十五条 学位申请人对专家评阅、答辩、成果认定等过程中相关学术组织或者人员作出的学术评价结论有异议的，可以向相应的学位分委员会书面申请学术复核。学位分委员会应当自受理学术复核申请之日起三十日内重新组织专家进行复核并作出复核决定，复核决定为最终决定。

Article 25; extracted text lines 285-285

Official university source ↗

Refusal to accept a degree application may be reviewed by the relevant unit; non-conferral or revocation may be reviewed by the university degree committee, or the person may seek legally provided external handling. The unit/committee must decide within thirty days after accepting a review application. These routes differ from academic-evaluation review.

Original evidence and scope

Refusal to accept a degree application may be reviewed by the relevant unit; non-conferral or revocation may be reviewed by the university degree committee, or the person may seek legally provided external handling. The unit/committee must decide within thirty days after accepting a review application. These routes differ from academic-evaluation review.

cl-tsinghua-degree-decision-review

University-wide, within the stated academic context

第二十六条  学位申请人对不受理其学位申请不服的，可以向相应院系书面申请复核或者请求有关机关依照法律规定处理；学位申请人或者学位获得者对不授予其学位或者撤销其学位等行为不服的，可以向校学位委员会书面申请复核或者请求有关机关依照法律规定处理。 学位申请人或者学位获得者申请复核的，相应院系或校学位委员会应当自受理复核申请之日起三十日内进行复核并作出复核决定。

Article 26; extracted text lines 286-287

Official university source ↗

AI tools & access

  • XiaodaOfficial recommendationConditions apply

    Use the official Xiaoda web portal or WeChat mini-program. A 29 September 2026 university-hosted report states access opened to all undergraduate and graduate students in June 2025; an undated center page retains the older 2024-cohort pilot wording. Authenticated eligibility and feature access were not tested.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Exams · 9 more topics · Records involved: 48 (12 corrected / adjusted · 36 added)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

48

Official sources

15 official URLs; 15 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Official news account: AI Education Guiding Principles (2025-11-26)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Official news account: AI Education Guiding Principles (2025-11-26) · 2026-10-17T05:13:22.596736Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

e2fa2e60c17e5437644a31abd6edd28155ebd7baf2ac6d064d40d04ece192ef8

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Official English news account: AI guiding principles

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Official English news account: AI guiding principles · 2026-10-17T05:13:23.674664Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

37fe0a179c4957aa5511f3bf3eb2a5949ca601267e0e81d42d2e40046175cec0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Historical Xiaoda student AI growth assistant feature (2024 rollout)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Historical Xiaoda student AI growth assistant feature (2024 rollout) · 2026-10-17T05:13:24.879094Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

9434473ddaca8d2fe980f2b46610c83958db3c7c6e5fd1a87b68b3ed03947233

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Academic Misconduct Investigation and Determination Measures (2025-11-17)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Academic Misconduct Investigation and Determination Measures (2025-11-17) · 2026-10-17T05:13:26.299256Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

d3dd17dee365892b52cf8296c7bb24716d3bf123a1b87e5f308da38ccd2ac3c0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Student Disciplinary Management Implementation Rules (2025-12-04)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Student Disciplinary Management Implementation Rules (2025-12-04) · 2026-10-17T05:13:27.856350Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

8935d0b9551de77f2f46c51cae4df5c841b95493f3274568b8ec918f9cb7397d

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Degree Conferment Implementation Measures (2026-02-05)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Degree Conferment Implementation Measures (2026-02-05) · 2026-10-17T05:13:29.269072Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

31985e8407aed1f0173fe4e1510917a442fa9be125a14f792f8bbb239131970b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Student Disciplinary Management Regulations (2025-12-04)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Student Disciplinary Management Regulations (2025-12-04) · 2026-10-17T05:13:30.932913Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a5a9ec7e7adf2f32d6dfc4e79f8da04ab97e2c0db49570d292ae43326712a66f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Student Disciplinary Work Implementation Measures (2025-12-04)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Student Disciplinary Work Implementation Measures (2025-12-04) · 2026-10-17T05:13:32.404354Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

717ab6b2c2d79818b249f6750198a5426b50eaf44f6c12d0e09d96782ae96eb5

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Student Appeal Handling Measures

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Student Appeal Handling Measures · 2026-10-17T05:13:33.825263Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

d1c2c1667b24fc3385c2e6bfc98ac687607943c095ae6e725e37abf5b8f4900e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

SIGS Academic Misconduct Investigation and Determination Measures (effective 2026-06-01)

gzzdjs.sigs.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School

Hash and captured version

SIGS Academic Misconduct Investigation and Determination Measures (effective 2026-06-01) · 2026-10-17T05:13:52.568643Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

20d10c816e86ccc87e3f133e21a5cda81e32c5757c96773f89b06fc83f3448a0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Officially hosted interview: Behind the AI education guidelines (2025-12-24)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Officially hosted interview: Behind the AI education guidelines (2025-12-24) · 2026-10-17T05:13:53.813527Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

51d78c735fa8c5af3e73c8cd6243b0b807ceeec82df63110fafb3efd2542b94e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Officially hosted interpretation: Guiding principles and management rules (2025-12-04)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Officially hosted interpretation: Guiding principles and management rules (2025-12-04) · 2026-10-17T05:13:55.006883Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

cf67d6cba7a6124b1fcb4cd03ccfc06e527f3cee78e26a4e7c9ef35f0c28a092

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Officially hosted report: Digital and AI support for student development (2026-09-29)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Officially hosted report: Digital and AI support for student development (2026-09-29) · 2026-10-17T05:13:56.242622Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

5d577a268960fadf8349ad18b0012b842460da096b2199fcbc175b3c8f72e047

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Undergraduate Student Status Management Regulations (effective 2020-09-01; posted 2021-03-18)

www.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Undergraduate Student Status Management Regulations (effective 2020-09-01; posted 2021-03-18) · 2026-10-17T05:17:36.034729Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

119b10d9b980efb13d585d393bc9eec909b2aa88da821a86c7fc4e4d7363991c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Student Learning and Development Center: Xiaoda (undated pilot wording)

learning.tsinghua.edu.cn

University official source

Tsinghua University

Hash and captured version

Student Learning and Development Center: Xiaoda (undated pilot wording) · 2026-10-17T05:13:57.620982Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

b5ff02a5e2b17c935d47d35ecdc593a91d3c5d531cdd89d874a986c6acd928d7

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
tsinghua-v6-r2-20261017
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Pending independent agent review; not an approved snapshot
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

          Current reviewed JSON
          Questions students ask

          Questions students ask

          Can I use AI for my coursework?

          Explore AI-assisted learning only within the course rules. The public news account forbids submitting copied or simply paraphrased AI output as academic work. Instructors set the permitted methods and extent; disciplinary findings and consequences remain case-specific.

          View evidence →
          Do I need to disclose AI use?

          The reported compliance-and-integrity principle calls for disclosure under applicable rules. The follow-up interview identifies substantive AI contribution to an academic outcome as a trigger for clear, prominent marking or declaration in the form required by the university, unit or instructor.

          View evidence →
          Can I upload sensitive data?

          The public guiding-principles account prohibits using sensitive, classified or unauthorized data to train or drive AI models. A campus tool listing does not authorize sensitive-data entry; current retention and tenant settings were not verified.

          View evidence →
          Which tools can I access?

          Xiaoda is an institutional student assistant. A dated September 2026 report states it opened to all undergraduate and graduate students in June 2025; an undated center page retains older pilot wording. Account entitlements and price were not tested. Access is separate from assessment or sensitive-data permission.

          View evidence →
          What are the examination rules?

          The reviewed public sources do not establish AI permission for a particular exam. General rules address unauthorized electronic-device retrieval and cheating; Xiaoda access grants no exam permission. Obtain the applicable exam instructions before using AI.

          View evidence →
          What rules apply to research and publication?

          For graduate theses and practical achievements, the public account prohibits replacing independent academic training and AI ghostwriting, plagiarism or fabrication; supervisors provide guidance and oversight. Research-misconduct investigation and degree non-conferral/revocation have distinct authorities, response rights and review routes. SIGS rules are unit-specific.

          View evidence →
          What counts as academic misconduct?

          Separate research investigation (15 working days for acceptance, five working days to form the group; normally three-month investigation/six-month overall handling, with suspension/extension rules), student discipline (five-working-day defense and ten-day expulsion-hearing request), student appeals (ten-day filing, normally fifteen-day review with possible fifteen-day extension), and degree review (thirty days after acceptance). These clocks and scopes are not interchangeable.

          View evidence →
          What guidance applies to teaching?

          The public news account recommends that instructors determine AI methods and extent from teaching objectives, explain usage rules at the start of a course and remain responsible for AI-generated teaching materials. The full guiding-principles document and specific AI-grading/upload-consent rules were not obtained.

          View evidence →
          What security and procurement requirements apply?

          The guiding-principles account supplies a sensitive-data restriction; it does not establish a complete public procurement or security-approval workflow. No verified universal approval route was found in this bounded review.

          View evidence →
          When was this record checked?

          Record checked:

          Record version →
          Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
          Where can I read the full evidence?

          48 · Full policy evidence

          Full policy evidence →
          Tsinghua University AI Policy