Beijing, China (Mainland)

China Agricultural University

China Agricultural University is listed as QS 2026 rank =504. China Agricultural University has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

China Agricultural University is listed as QS 2026 rank =504. China Agricultural University has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists China Agricultural University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/china-agricultural-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage5 reviewedSource languagezh-CNPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/china-agricultural-university.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score90/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

For undergraduate graduation theses/designs, China Agricultural University's Undergraduate School notice says the university encourages reasonable AI use for efficiency and idea expansion but prohibits direct writing of core thesis content, falsifying research data or processes with AIGC tools, whole-paper ghostwriting, and uploading confidential theses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: undergraduate_thesis_genai_prohibited_uses

Original evidence

Evidence 1
学校倡导合理使用人工智能提高效率与拓展思路,辅助完善毕业论文(设计)的文献检索、资料整理、数据分析等内容,但禁止以下行为:禁止直接撰写论文核心内容

Localized display only

The notice encourages reasonable AI use for efficiency and idea expansion in undergraduate thesis/design work, while prohibiting direct writing of core thesis content.

Academic Integrity

For China Agricultural University graduate degree theses or degree-application practice成果, the Graduate School says the work should be independently completed under supervisor guidance and that generative AI must not directly write core content such as research methods, conclusions, or innovative viewpoints.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: graduate_thesis_core_content_ai_direct_writing_prohibited

Original evidence

Evidence 1
研究生学位论文或申请学位实践成果应在导师指导下由本人独立完成,不得使用生成式人工智能直接撰写核心内容,包括但不限于研究方法、研究结论、创新性观点等

Localized display only

Graduate theses or degree-application practice成果 should be independently completed under supervisor guidance; generative AI may not directly write core content.

Ai Tool Treatment

For graduate theses or degree-application practice成果, China Agricultural University's Graduate School says generative AI used for literature retrieval or language normalization should be a nationally filed service tool, checked for truthfulness, accuracy, and reliability, and disclosed with tool name, version, date, and use process in notes, acknowledgements, references, or appendices.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: graduate_thesis_genai_assistance_disclosure_and_registered_tool_condition

Original evidence

Evidence 1
使用生成式人工智能辅助文献检索、语言规范时,应使用经国家备案登记的服务工具,且对生成内容的真实性、准确性、可靠性进行自查,并在注释、致谢、参考文献或附录等部分声明工具的名称、版本、日期及使用过程

Localized display only

When using generative AI for literature retrieval or language normalization, the source calls for nationally filed service tools, self-checking output, and disclosure of tool details and use process.

Academic Integrity

For undergraduate graduation theses/designs, China Agricultural University's Undergraduate School notice says verified prohibited AI-use behavior is treated as thesis fraud under the university's thesis-fraud handling rules, with consequences including cancellation of degree-application eligibility before degree award or revocation and certificate cancellation after degree award.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: undergraduate_thesis_genai_prohibited_behavior_thesis_fraud_consequence

Original evidence

Evidence 1
一经发现并核实存在以上行为的,则认定为论文作假行为。按照《中国农业大学学位论文作假行为处理办法实施细则》(中农大研生字【2015】1号)规定,未获得学位的,取消其学位申请资格,已获得学位的,撤销其学位,并注销学位证书。

Localized display only

Verified prohibited behavior is treated as thesis fraud, with cancellation of degree-application eligibility before degree award or revocation and certificate cancellation after award.

Privacy

For confidential, delayed-publication, or unpublished graduate thesis/practice成果 content, China Agricultural University's Graduate School warns students to protect content and prohibits uploading confidential content or misusing generative AI in ways that endanger data security, infringe intellectual property, or leak personal privacy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: graduate_thesis_genai_confidential_content_upload_prohibited

Original evidence

Evidence 1
对于涉密、延迟公开或尚未公开发表的内容,务必注意内容保护,禁止上传涉密内容,且不得滥用生成式人工智能危害数据安全,侵犯知识产权,泄露个人隐私等

Localized display only

For confidential, delayed-publication, or unpublished content, the source prohibits uploading confidential content and warns against AI misuse affecting data security, IP, or personal privacy.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities