Shanghai, China (Mainland) Last checked

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional

SJTU’s2025 trial framework classifies uses as prohibited, limited, encouraged or open; students must follow each course’s AI rules. Teachers publish scope and citation formats through syllabus/class/grading rules. Categories are not permission for every assignment or exam.

Official source ↗

Exams

Unclear

SJTU’s2025 trial framework classifies uses as prohibited, limited, encouraged or open; students must follow each course’s AI rules. Teachers publish scope and citation formats through syllabus/class/grading rules. Categories are not permission for every assignment or exam.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required

Students should mark and cite necessary information about AI tools; the instructor explains applicable citation templates and permitted uses. Citation does not authorize prohibited use.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Restricted

The trial framework forbids privacy violations and information theft in AI development/use contexts and requires school approval or filing when using school public data. It does not establish a full vendor-training or retention matrix.

Official source ↗

Tools and access

Unclear

SJTU Xflops documents a locally deployed DeepSeek service supported by Xflops/Network Information Center, with named models. Eligibility, price, vendor/log retention and task authorization are not established by the listing.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Unclear

The2025 graduate academic standards have a separate research/degree misconduct and review framework for current postgraduates and prior SJTU postgraduate degree holders. They do not grant blanket AI thesis/publication permission.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Restricted

The2024 academic-integrity code supersedes2021. Dishonesty in an assignment/lab assessment results in zero for that component; repeated dishonesty in one course gives a course zero. The retake maximum60 applies when dishonesty led to disciplinary punishment, not every AI use. Joint programmes may have separately filed rules. The2025 disciplinary process gives students an opportunity to respond; a hearing may be requested within three working days from receipt of the proposed disciplinary decision. This is a proposed-decision hearing clock, not the final-decision appeal deadline. The2024 integrity code states five-working-day objections after notification and refers disciplinary appeals to the student appeal rules. Separately,2025 discipline and2017 appeal texts use different deadlines. Their cross-document priority remains unresolved here; preserve the decision and seek the applicable route rather than merging clocks.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Required

Teachers carry primary responsibility for AI-supported design, explain use scope and risks, and provide testing/filing where necessary. This does not approve every external product.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Restricted

The trial framework forbids privacy violations and information theft in AI development/use contexts and requires school approval or filing when using school public data. It does not establish a full vendor-training or retention matrix. Teachers carry primary responsibility for AI-supported design, explain use scope and risks, and provide testing/filing where necessary. This does not approve every external product.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check the exact course and assessment instructions before use.
    Site advice
  • Follow the applicable disclosure and attribution rules.
    Site advice
  • Preserve the actual notice and identify the correct review procedure.
    Site advice

Don’t

  • Do not treat tool access or examples as assessment permission.
    Site advice
  • Do not assume a service has unrestricted data approval or no retention.
    Site advice
  • Do not transfer another programme’s sanction or deadline to your case.
    Site advice

AI use questioned?

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Rules depend on the course, unit, research role and source version. This institution audit remains partial.

Investigation & response

The2025 disciplinary process gives students an opportunity to respond; a hearing may be requested within three working days from receipt of the proposed disciplinary decision. This is a proposed-decision hearing clock, not the final-decision appeal deadline.

Original evidence and scope

The2025 disciplinary process gives students an opportunity to respond; a hearing may be requested within three working days from receipt of the proposed disciplinary decision. This is a proposed-decision hearing clock, not the final-decision appeal deadline.

shanghai-jiao-tong-university-local-20261023-response

2025 disciplinary procedure; academic-integrity committee hearing route separately specified.

相关学院(系)自收到证据之日起7个工作日内向当事学生了解情况,听取当事学生的陈述,形成双方签字确认的书面谈话记录,并作出书面处分建议。 当事学生或者其代理人无正当理由,超过期限不提出陈述和申辩的,视为放弃权利。 学院(系)召开党政联席会议,作出书面处分建议并加盖学院(系)行政公章后,连同证据、学生书面陈述、学生的书面谈话记录或者学生弃权说明等一并报送学生处。

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 ff4f07612b85a6e8fb9addb38801bd190d222a80d3cf7f6fae2b4e8563f5e785; original binding lines 821–823; characters 44089–44269; excerpt offset 0–180

Official university source ↗
收到拟处分决定书的当事学生自收到拟处分决定书之日起3个工作日内有权向所在学院(系)申请听证;涉及学业诚信的,可向学校学生诚信工作委员会书面申请听证。申请应当具体载明当事学生请求会议讨论的具体事项并附具申辩理由,并可以附具证据材料。 学生处应当自收到听证申请后组织召开学校学生诚信工作委员会会议,听取咨询意见,并形成会议记录。需要变更拟处分决定的,变更后连同校级诚信工作委员会会议记录一并提交法律事务室审核。 第四十七条 处分决定

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 ff4f07612b85a6e8fb9addb38801bd190d222a80d3cf7f6fae2b4e8563f5e785; original binding lines 827–829; characters 44442–44656; excerpt offset 0–214

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

The2024 academic-integrity code supersedes2021. Dishonesty in an assignment/lab assessment results in zero for that component; repeated dishonesty in one course gives a course zero. The retake maximum60 applies when dishonesty led to disciplinary punishment, not every AI use. Joint programmes may have separately filed rules.

Original evidence and scope

The2024 academic-integrity code supersedes2021. Dishonesty in an assignment/lab assessment results in zero for that component; repeated dishonesty in one course gives a course zero. The retake maximum60 applies when dishonesty led to disciplinary punishment, not every AI use. Joint programmes may have separately filed rules.

shanghai-jiao-tong-university-local-20261023-integrity

2024 integrity code, all enrolled students with authorised joint-programme exception.

本守则自发布之日起施行,原《上海交通大学学生学业诚信守则》(沪交教〔2021〕32号)同时废止。

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 e88505b630b2caa2463d30c7689cd962e69b5c02e98ba5db60706232ef3ecbf8; original binding lines 1035–1036; characters 24361–24411; excerpt offset 0–50

Official university source ↗
对于学生在作业、实验等课堂教学环节中出现不诚信行为的,对该考核环节的成绩作零分处理;对在同一门课程教学过程中出现两次及以上不诚信行为的,对该课程成绩作零分处理;上述不诚信行为的认定及处理由任课(指导)教师负责执行,并将具体情况上报至学生所在学院(系)学生诚信工作分委员会备案。

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 e88505b630b2caa2463d30c7689cd962e69b5c02e98ba5db60706232ef3ecbf8; original binding lines 957–957; characters 23036–23174; excerpt offset 0–138

Official university source ↗
(一)学生在修读某课程过程中,若有违反学业诚信行为且受到纪律处分的,该课程重修后成绩最高为60分;

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 e88505b630b2caa2463d30c7689cd962e69b5c02e98ba5db60706232ef3ecbf8; original binding lines 987–988; characters 23709–23760; excerpt offset 0–51

Official university source ↗
本守则适用对象为上海交通大学全体在读学生。根据学校授权,中外合作办学学院可根据本学院的特殊情况,参照本守则制定本学院的诚信管理规定,并报上海交通大学学生诚信工作委员会审核备案。

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 e88505b630b2caa2463d30c7689cd962e69b5c02e98ba5db60706232ef3ecbf8; original binding lines 837–838; characters 21536–21626; excerpt offset 0–90

Official university source ↗

Review & appeal

The2024 integrity code states five-working-day objections after notification and refers disciplinary appeals to the student appeal rules. Separately,2025 discipline and2017 appeal texts use different deadlines. Their cross-document priority remains unresolved here; preserve the decision and seek the applicable route rather than merging clocks.

Original evidence and scope

The2024 integrity code states five-working-day objections after notification and refers disciplinary appeals to the student appeal rules. Separately,2025 discipline and2017 appeal texts use different deadlines. Their cross-document priority remains unresolved here; preserve the decision and seek the applicable route rather than merging clocks.

shanghai-jiao-tong-university-local-20261023-appeal-conflict

Unresolved2024/2025/2017 cross-document timing; no numerical final-appeal recommendation.

学生在收到对不诚信行为处理结果的通知后,如存在异议,可在收到通知之日起的5个工作日内提出申诉。

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 e88505b630b2caa2463d30c7689cd962e69b5c02e98ba5db60706232ef3ecbf8; original binding lines 1005–1006; characters 23923–23972; excerpt offset 0–49

Official university source ↗
学生因考试作弊等学业不诚信行为受到纪律处分的,可在接到处分决定书之日起的5个工作日内,向校学生申诉处理委员会提出书面申诉,具体程序按照《上海交通大学学生申诉管理规定》进行。

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 e88505b630b2caa2463d30c7689cd962e69b5c02e98ba5db60706232ef3ecbf8; original binding lines 1026–1027; characters 24252–24340; excerpt offset 0–88

Official university source ↗

AI tools & access

These tools have audience, account, mode or purpose limits; access is not established for all students and does not grant assessment permission. Check each access condition.

  • SJTU Xflops local DeepSeekUniversity-hosted serviceAvailability not established

    Consult Xflops/Network Information Center service instructions; account access not tested.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Exams · 10 more topics · Records involved: 14 (5 corrected / adjusted · 9 added)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

14

Official sources

9 official URLs; 9 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

《上海交通大学关于在教育教学中使用AI的规范》(试行版)

plan.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

《上海交通大学关于在教育教学中使用AI的规范》(试行版) · 2026-10-23T19:46:41.188475Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

ff78ac6da074170fd4c7998f9935688bcee5928c5f92e3f5fa7bc8319787b52e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

上海交通大学关于在教育教学中使用AI的规范(试行版)

www.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

上海交通大学关于在教育教学中使用AI的规范(试行版) · 2026-10-23T19:46:41.326903Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

8772c9bf7045cea1e0ca048d6cc8840a77d7edd151ed83fb970d549dcc178eb4

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

上海交通大学学生学业诚信守则 沪交教〔2024〕13号

gk.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

上海交通大学学生学业诚信守则 沪交教〔2024〕13号 · 2026-10-23T19:46:41.837229Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

c43fab73ba4a2cfeb6028dcb4f11d1968865b56a424d4dca00d6ef964433fa1f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

上海交通大学学生学业诚信守则 沪交教〔2024〕13号

soe.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

上海交通大学学生学业诚信守则 沪交教〔2024〕13号 · 2026-10-23T19:46:42.043724Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

41c06567c253780e5f0a121924804294d4204737a860909f922411d58b1f0c3c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

上海交通大学学生违纪处分规定 沪交学〔2025〕55号

gs.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

上海交通大学学生违纪处分规定 沪交学〔2025〕55号 · 2026-10-23T19:46:43.518808Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

772c3043ed3243f36f445a73e369cd2d714be0efcfa15bf2d4078361f25377d8

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

上海交通大学学生申诉管理规定 沪交办〔2017〕31号

gk.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

上海交通大学学生申诉管理规定 沪交办〔2017〕31号 · 2026-10-23T19:46:44.164659Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

5bad5cce08a01e10f646d0de76e9eb692fa447758b9d649ecb22fcdaa5800fa0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

如何高效获取信息 - HPC入门指南

xflops.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

如何高效获取信息 - HPC入门指南 · 2026-10-23T19:46:44.472771Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

7721b6d5fd8a084ee9ca9a964fb27ba1b44cd98671f6928cce8879e4907eb3b6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

上海交通大学发布“规范学生使用人工智能工具的教师指南”

ctldnew.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

上海交通大学发布“规范学生使用人工智能工具的教师指南” · 2026-10-23T19:46:44.964276Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

9e9d87feeb0f0161f580c46c43c1860075e6923502d721c5f0e9e12e5e6c87db

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

上海交通大学研究生学术规范 沪交研〔2025〕60号

www.gs.sjtu.edu.cn

University official source

Hash and captured version

上海交通大学研究生学术规范 沪交研〔2025〕60号 · 2026-10-23T19:46:45.505069Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

315e80b4a080e2192e5184eb6d3fd411a081956b4b04039c46a130111a0f303c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs46-50-v6-r1-20261023
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • All original objects, public Claim IDs, independent tool objects, held inputs and historical student snapshots are separately reconciled and retained. Research findings are not publication approval.
  • Original research captures remain excerpts/transcriptions. New original raw response hashes are separately bound; historical snapshot hashes not overwritten.
  • Only selected official URLs acquired; whole-institution currentness and all-course coverage not established. Source/year/unit/must-may and unresolved procedure conflicts retained.
  • Original remaining keys and33 requirement gaps persist unless an explicit scoped local evidence receipt addresses them.
  • No commit/push/productionbuild/SSHmutation/deploy/restart/cutover/snapshotrepin/IndexNow. Public/API/MCP/history not changed.
  • ENZH local presentation is a private candidate, not approved strong student snapshot.
  • 2024 integrity five-working-day text conflicts with2025 discipline ten-day and2017 appeal wording; no priority decided. Reuploaded2021 not treated as current.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        SJTU’s2025 trial framework classifies uses as prohibited, limited, encouraged or open; students must follow each course’s AI rules. Teachers publish scope and citation formats through syllabus/class/grading rules. Categories are not permission for every assignment or exam.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Students should mark and cite necessary information about AI tools; the instructor explains applicable citation templates and permitted uses. Citation does not authorize prohibited use.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        The trial framework forbids privacy violations and information theft in AI development/use contexts and requires school approval or filing when using school public data. It does not establish a full vendor-training or retention matrix.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        SJTU Xflops documents a locally deployed DeepSeek service supported by Xflops/Network Information Center, with named models. Eligibility, price, vendor/log retention and task authorization are not established by the listing.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        SJTU’s2025 trial framework classifies uses as prohibited, limited, encouraged or open; students must follow each course’s AI rules. Teachers publish scope and citation formats through syllabus/class/grading rules. Categories are not permission for every assignment or exam.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        The2025 graduate academic standards have a separate research/degree misconduct and review framework for current postgraduates and prior SJTU postgraduate degree holders. They do not grant blanket AI thesis/publication permission.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        The2024 academic-integrity code supersedes2021. Dishonesty in an assignment/lab assessment results in zero for that component; repeated dishonesty in one course gives a course zero. The retake maximum60 applies when dishonesty led to disciplinary punishment, not every AI use. Joint programmes may have separately filed rules. The2025 disciplinary process gives students an opportunity to respond; a hearing may be requested within three working days from receipt of the proposed disciplinary decision. This is a proposed-decision hearing clock, not the final-decision appeal deadline. The2024 integrity code states five-working-day objections after notification and refers disciplinary appeals to the student appeal rules. Separately,2025 discipline and2017 appeal texts use different deadlines. Their cross-document priority remains unresolved here; preserve the decision and seek the applicable route rather than merging clocks.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Teachers carry primary responsibility for AI-supported design, explain use scope and risks, and provide testing/filing where necessary. This does not approve every external product.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        The trial framework forbids privacy violations and information theft in AI development/use contexts and requires school approval or filing when using school public data. It does not establish a full vendor-training or retention matrix. Teachers carry primary responsibility for AI-supported design, explain use scope and risks, and provide testing/filing where necessary. This does not approve every external product.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        14 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        Shanghai Jiao Tong University AI Policy