Shanghai, China (Mainland) Last checked

Fudan University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Course rules first

No blanket ban on AI in ordinary courses was found. According to Fudan's official announcement, the January 2026 teaching guide allows AI for supporting steps such as language polishing and structural suggestions but not for core academic work, and expects course syllabi to set AI conditions. The stricter undergraduate-thesis rule applies to course, term and exam papers only where no specific rule exists ('may refer to').

Official source ↗

Exams

Check course and exam rules

No general exam AI rule was found; exam papers may refer to the undergraduate-thesis rule where no specific rule exists. Follow each course and exam's instructions.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required for thesis use

For undergraduate theses, any AI use must be disclosed in the thesis commitment form: tool name and version, time and purpose, what the AI produced, where it was used, plus keeping pre-AI materials for inspection. The 2026 teaching guide, as reported, judges integrity mainly on honest disclosure and process records.

Official source ↗

Privacy & sensitive data

No AI for confidential theses

Undergraduate theses involving confidential content may not use any AI tool or upload any data or images to AI platforms. No broader university AI data rule was found in the reviewed sources; the AI Service Hall states it uses a locally deployed model to protect data (not independently verified).

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Administrative tools only

Fudan's AI Service Hall (eHall, March 2025) provides administrative services through modules 复小搜 (search) and 复小填 (form filling, three initial service items); 复小信 is an earlier Q&A assistant from 2021. The AI3A platform (January 2026) gathers teaching cases and course-level tools. These are not a list of tools approved for coursework.

Official source ↗

Research & publication

Thesis rule is undergraduate-only

The AI thesis rule covers undergraduate theses only and expressly excludes published papers and research activities, which are governed by other rules. Fudan's 2026 graduate thesis format norms contain no AI provision; graduate students should check their school, supervisor and the Graduate School for applicable rules.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity & procedures

Graded handling and appeal

In undergraduate theses AI may only assist (with supervisor consent) with literature search, chart suggestions, non-innovative code and reference formatting, and is banned for research design, data, key figures, writing text, language polishing and translation. Breaches are handled by seriousness, from the thesis grade or barring the defence to discipline and degree consequences only where misconduct is found. Disciplinary decisions can be appealed to the University Student Appeals Committee within 10 days, then to the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission within 15 days.

Official source ↗

Teaching & course guidance

Recommended

According to Fudan's official announcement (the full guide on the AI3A platform was not independently reviewed), the Generative AI Education and Teaching Application Guide 1.0 allows AI for auxiliary steps such as language polishing and structural suggestions, but prohibits replacing core academic work (research conception, theory building, and data analysis). Academic integrity evaluation focuses on truthful disclosure and traceable process records. This teaching guidance does not override stricter undergraduate thesis prohibitions against AI text writing, polishing, and translation.

Official source ↗

Security & procurement

Unclear

Central IT security review protocols, enterprise vendor data protection assessments, and university-wide procurement guidelines for AI platforms remain unverified in reviewed records.

Before you submit

Do

  • Undergraduate thesis: get your supervisor's consent before any AI use, and only for literature search, chart-type suggestions, non-innovative code or reference formatting.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Disclose AI tool, version, time, purpose, outputs and where it was used in the thesis commitment form, and keep pre-AI materials.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Per official announcement (full guide on AI3A was not independently reviewed), use AI only for auxiliary steps like language polishing or structural suggestions, not core academic work (research conception, theory building, data analysis); disclose truthfully with traceable process records, noting this does not override stricter undergraduate-thesis prohibitions (which forbid writing, polishing and translation).
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Do not use AI to write, polish or translate undergraduate thesis text, or to design research or analyse data.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not generate or alter original data or key result figures with AI.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not use any AI tool, or upload data or images, for a thesis involving confidential content.
    Requirement in this scope

AI use questioned?

Fudan University

Fudan rule on AI tools in undergraduate theses (24 Sep 2024, trial; reproduced in a college's 2024 thesis rules); Fudan official news on the Generative AI Teaching Application Guide 1.0 (Jan 2026; guide text itself not reviewed); Student Disciplinary and Student Appeals Regulations; Information Office AI Service Hall notice. Institution audit remains PARTIAL.

Investigation & response

Under Fudan's Student Disciplinary Regulations (2017, amended 2019), students must be informed of their right to state their case and defend themselves before a sanction. A student who disagrees with a disciplinary decision may appeal to the University Student Appeals Committee within ten days (not working days) of service of the decision; the committee normally concludes within fifteen days (extendable by fifteen), and a student who disagrees with the review decision may appeal to the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission within fifteen days of its service (Student Appeals Regulations, effective 1 September 2017). A teacher's request to redo or supplement an assessment is not automatically a disciplinary decision.

Original evidence and scope

Under Fudan's Student Disciplinary Regulations (2017, amended 2019), students must be informed of their right to state their case and defend themselves before a sanction. A student who disagrees with a disciplinary decision may appeal to the University Student Appeals Committee within ten days (not working days) of service of the decision; the committee normally concludes within fifteen days (extendable by fifteen), and a student who disagrees with the review decision may appeal to the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission within fifteen days of its service (Student Appeals Regulations, effective 1 September 2017). A teacher's request to redo or supplement an assessment is not automatically a disciplinary decision.

draft-claim-fudan-discipline-appeal
第十六条 学生本人不服处分决定的,可以在处分决定书送达之日起十日内向学校学生申诉处理委员会提出申诉。

学生纪律处分条例 第十六条; physical PDF page 5; lines 200-202 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
学生提出申诉,应当在处理决定书送达之日起十日内,向学生申诉处理委员会递交申诉申请书,并提供处理决定书的副本。

学生申诉处理条例 第十四条; lines 175-175 of captured page text

Official university source ↗
学生申诉处理委员会对申诉案件,应当在收到申诉申请书之日起十五日内作出复查结论并告知申诉人。有特殊情况需要延长的,由学生申诉处理委员会主任批准,可以延长十五日。

第二十九条; lines 253-253 of captured page text

Official university source ↗
申诉人对复查决定有异议的,在复查决定书送达之日起十五日内,可以向上海市教育委员会提出申诉。

第三十三条; lines 261-261 of captured page text

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

Under the Fudan undergraduate-thesis AI rule, breaches are handled according to their seriousness: they may be reflected in the thesis assessment grade, lead to refusal of the defence or cancellation of a passing grade, and only where they constitute academic misconduct lead to disciplinary sanctions, loss of degree eligibility or degree revocation. Course papers, term papers and exam papers may refer to this rule where no specific rule exists, while published academic papers and research activities are governed by other rules and are outside its scope. Supervisors and reviewers may add supplementary assessment to check the student's mastery.

Original evidence and scope

Under the Fudan undergraduate-thesis AI rule, breaches are handled according to their seriousness: they may be reflected in the thesis assessment grade, lead to refusal of the defence or cancellation of a passing grade, and only where they constitute academic misconduct lead to disciplinary sanctions, loss of degree eligibility or degree revocation. Course papers, term papers and exam papers may refer to this rule where no specific rule exists, while published academic papers and research activities are governed by other rules and are outside its scope. Supervisors and reviewers may add supplementary assessment to check the student's mastery.

draft-claim-fudan-thesis-ai-consequences-scope
学生违反相关规定使用 AI 工具的,视情节给予纳入本科毕业论文(设计)考核成绩、不准答辩、取消合格成绩等处理;构成学术不端(不当)的,按照相关校纪校规给予纪律处分、取消学位申请资格、撤销学位等处理。

第七条第4项; physical PDF page 6; lines 241-245 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
考试论文、学年论文、课程论文等考核性论文(设计)若无具体的针对性规定,亦可参照此规定执行。

第八条第2项; physical PDF page 7; lines 253-255 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
在发表的学术论文(交流性论文)或学术研究活动中使用 AI 工具另有规定,不适用此规定。

第八条第3项; physical PDF page 7; lines 257-259 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
11月28日,复旦发布《复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用AI工具的规定(试行)》(以下简称《规定》),对AI工具的使用进行详细规范。

校报报道(2024-12-20); lines 168-168 of captured page text

Official university source ↗

Review & appeal

Under Fudan's Student Disciplinary Regulations (2017, amended 2019), students must be informed of their right to state their case and defend themselves before a sanction. A student who disagrees with a disciplinary decision may appeal to the University Student Appeals Committee within ten days (not working days) of service of the decision; the committee normally concludes within fifteen days (extendable by fifteen), and a student who disagrees with the review decision may appeal to the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission within fifteen days of its service (Student Appeals Regulations, effective 1 September 2017). A teacher's request to redo or supplement an assessment is not automatically a disciplinary decision.

Original evidence and scope

Under Fudan's Student Disciplinary Regulations (2017, amended 2019), students must be informed of their right to state their case and defend themselves before a sanction. A student who disagrees with a disciplinary decision may appeal to the University Student Appeals Committee within ten days (not working days) of service of the decision; the committee normally concludes within fifteen days (extendable by fifteen), and a student who disagrees with the review decision may appeal to the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission within fifteen days of its service (Student Appeals Regulations, effective 1 September 2017). A teacher's request to redo or supplement an assessment is not automatically a disciplinary decision.

draft-claim-fudan-discipline-appeal
第十六条 学生本人不服处分决定的,可以在处分决定书送达之日起十日内向学校学生申诉处理委员会提出申诉。

学生纪律处分条例 第十六条; physical PDF page 5; lines 200-202 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
学生提出申诉,应当在处理决定书送达之日起十日内,向学生申诉处理委员会递交申诉申请书,并提供处理决定书的副本。

学生申诉处理条例 第十四条; lines 175-175 of captured page text

Official university source ↗
学生申诉处理委员会对申诉案件,应当在收到申诉申请书之日起十五日内作出复查结论并告知申诉人。有特殊情况需要延长的,由学生申诉处理委员会主任批准,可以延长十五日。

第二十九条; lines 253-253 of captured page text

Official university source ↗
申诉人对复查决定有异议的,在复查决定书送达之日起十五日内,可以向上海市教育委员会提出申诉。

第三十三条; lines 261-261 of captured page text

Official university source ↗

AI tools & access

  • 复旦大学AI办事大厅University-hosted serviceConditions apply

    Fudan eHall with unified identity authentication (current access not independently tested).

  • 复小填University-hosted serviceConditions apply

    Within Fudan eHall AI Service Hall.

  • 复小搜University-hosted serviceConditions apply

    Within Fudan eHall AI Service Hall.

  • 复小信University-hosted serviceAvailability not established

    Not stated in the reviewed source.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Exams · 6 more topics · Records involved: 11 (5 corrected / adjusted · 6 added)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

11

Official sources

6 official URLs; 6 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用AI工具的规定(试行)(2024年9月24日教务处处务会通过;国际文化交流学院本科毕业论文工作管理办法附件1)

ices.fudan.edu.cn

University official source

复旦大学教务处 / 国际文化交流学院

Hash and captured version

复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用AI工具的规定(试行)(2024年9月24日教务处处务会通过;国际文化交流学院本科毕业论文工作管理办法附件1) · 2026-10-20T06:18:58Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

f870863b2c670a906f70c985812e9914c82a190c6f5801c12d054ff7740756ef

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

发布国内高校首个AI新规(《复旦》校报,2024-12-20)

news.fudan.edu.cn

University official source

复旦大学

Hash and captured version

发布国内高校首个AI新规(《复旦》校报,2024-12-20) · 2026-10-20T06:24:22Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

63c88f9848bfb85a5493de843e6bfa9c9939127dc607011ce235e8de7a01ed10

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

复旦大学发布人工智能共创平台及应用指引(2026-01-13)

www.fudan.edu.cn

University official source

复旦大学

Hash and captured version

复旦大学发布人工智能共创平台及应用指引(2026-01-13) · 2026-10-20T06:19:03Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

ac76acffd0007e6540ef3787c4a40e58e7b3320bc61360c492053ca4a9f19378

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

复旦大学学生纪律处分条例(2017年施行,2019年7月16日修正)

mse.fudan.edu.cn

University official source

复旦大学

Hash and captured version

复旦大学学生纪律处分条例(2017年施行,2019年7月16日修正) · 2026-10-20T06:19:18Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

e89a3c7d3fa184edc13f54d817bbeef5e192fe52caa1ea23cb8d86ab072e5638

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

复旦大学学生申诉处理条例(2017年9月1日施行)

www.cce.fudan.edu.cn

University official source

复旦大学

Hash and captured version

复旦大学学生申诉处理条例(2017年9月1日施行) · 2026-10-20T06:19:10Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

0b95d56de4dd9ebb5507778fee0ad21c064b9dcf6205b407877ab390aa5d95c4

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

复旦eHall再升级!AI办事大厅上线(信息化办公室,2025-04-11)

xxb.fudan.edu.cn

University official source

复旦大学信息化办公室

Hash and captured version

复旦eHall再升级!AI办事大厅上线(信息化办公室,2025-04-11) · 2026-10-20T05:35:55Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

bb0ed5c205b72363e8d12f21bff66662b43beee16c15c59271be1c192b85b38f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs25-31-v6-r1-20261020
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

          Current reviewed JSON
          Questions students ask

          Questions students ask

          Can I use AI for my coursework?

          No blanket ban on AI in ordinary courses was found. According to Fudan's official announcement, the January 2026 teaching guide allows AI for supporting steps such as language polishing and structural suggestions but not for core academic work, and expects course syllabi to set AI conditions. The stricter undergraduate-thesis rule applies to course, term and exam papers only where no specific rule exists ('may refer to').

          View evidence →
          Do I need to disclose AI use?

          For undergraduate theses, any AI use must be disclosed in the thesis commitment form: tool name and version, time and purpose, what the AI produced, where it was used, plus keeping pre-AI materials for inspection. The 2026 teaching guide, as reported, judges integrity mainly on honest disclosure and process records.

          View evidence →
          Can I upload sensitive data?

          Undergraduate theses involving confidential content may not use any AI tool or upload any data or images to AI platforms. No broader university AI data rule was found in the reviewed sources; the AI Service Hall states it uses a locally deployed model to protect data (not independently verified).

          View evidence →
          Which tools can I access?

          Fudan's AI Service Hall (eHall, March 2025) provides administrative services through modules 复小搜 (search) and 复小填 (form filling, three initial service items); 复小信 is an earlier Q&A assistant from 2021. The AI3A platform (January 2026) gathers teaching cases and course-level tools. These are not a list of tools approved for coursework.

          View evidence →
          What are the examination rules?

          No general exam AI rule was found; exam papers may refer to the undergraduate-thesis rule where no specific rule exists. Follow each course and exam's instructions.

          View evidence →
          What rules apply to research and publication?

          The AI thesis rule covers undergraduate theses only and expressly excludes published papers and research activities, which are governed by other rules. Fudan's 2026 graduate thesis format norms contain no AI provision; graduate students should check their school, supervisor and the Graduate School for applicable rules.

          View evidence →
          What counts as academic misconduct?

          In undergraduate theses AI may only assist (with supervisor consent) with literature search, chart suggestions, non-innovative code and reference formatting, and is banned for research design, data, key figures, writing text, language polishing and translation. Breaches are handled by seriousness, from the thesis grade or barring the defence to discipline and degree consequences only where misconduct is found. Disciplinary decisions can be appealed to the University Student Appeals Committee within 10 days, then to the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission within 15 days.

          View evidence →
          What guidance applies to teaching?

          According to Fudan's official announcement (the full guide on the AI3A platform was not independently reviewed), the Generative AI Education and Teaching Application Guide 1.0 allows AI for auxiliary steps such as language polishing and structural suggestions, but prohibits replacing core academic work (research conception, theory building, and data analysis). Academic integrity evaluation focuses on truthful disclosure and traceable process records. This teaching guidance does not override stricter undergraduate thesis prohibitions against AI text writing, polishing, and translation.

          View evidence →
          What security and procurement requirements apply?

          Central IT security review protocols, enterprise vendor data protection assessments, and university-wide procurement guidelines for AI platforms remain unverified in reviewed records.

          View evidence →
          When was this record checked?

          Record checked:

          Record version →
          Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
          Where can I read the full evidence?

          11 · Full policy evidence

          Full policy evidence →
          Fudan University AI Policy