Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Shanghai, China (Mainland)
Fudan University
Fudan University is listed as QS 2026 rank 30. Fudan University has 1 source-backed AI policy claim record from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Fudan University is listed as QS 2026 rank 30. Fudan University has 1 source-backed AI policy claim record from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
1 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
复旦大学学生工作部公开页面援引《复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用 AI 工具的规定(试行)》称，本科毕业论文写作中使用 AI 工具辅助需经老师同意并披露使用情况，数据收集、核心观点提炼等创新工作不可依赖 AI，涉密和隐私内容禁止使用 AI。
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Fudan Student Affairs Office states, by reference to Fudan undergraduate-thesis AI tool rules, that AI assistance in undergraduate thesis writing requires teacher consent and disclosure, core innovative work must not rely on AI, and confidential or private content must not be used with AI.
Original evidence
Evidence 1特别的,对于写作中对 AI 工具的规范与使用,徐老师认为要做到辅助不替代。她援引《复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用 AI 工具的规定(试行)》,说明在学术写作中使用 AI 工具辅助,需经老师同意并披露使用情况(工具版本、范围),且核查 AI 生成内容,防止虚假信息。对于数据收集、核心观点提炼等创新工作不可依赖 AI ,涉密和隐私内容禁止使用 AI 。
Localized display only
The Fudan Student Affairs Office page references Fudan undergraduate-thesis AI tool rules and says AI assistance in academic writing requires teacher consent and disclosure of use, AI-generated content must be checked, core innovative work such as data collection and core argument development may not rely on AI, and confidential or private content must not be used with AI.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
【项目回顾】论文通关！手把手教你搞定学术写作
stuaff.fudan.edu.cn
复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文（设计）中使用 AI 工具的规定（试行）
it.fudan.edu.cn
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.