Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Shanghai, China (Mainland)
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Fudan University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
1 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Fudan Student Affairs Office states, by reference to Fudan undergraduate-thesis AI tool rules, that AI assistance in undergraduate thesis writing requires teacher consent and disclosure, core innovative work must not rely on AI, and confidential or private content must not be used with AI.
Original evidence
Evidence 1特别的,对于写作中对 AI 工具的规范与使用,徐老师认为要做到辅助不替代。她援引《复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用 AI 工具的规定(试行)》,说明在学术写作中使用 AI 工具辅助,需经老师同意并披露使用情况(工具版本、范围),且核查 AI 生成内容,防止虚假信息。对于数据收集、核心观点提炼等创新工作不可依赖 AI ,涉密和隐私内容禁止使用 AI 。
Localized display only
The Fudan Student Affairs Office page references Fudan undergraduate-thesis AI tool rules and says AI assistance in academic writing requires teacher consent and disclosure of use, AI-generated content must be checked, core innovative work such as data collection and core argument development may not rely on AI, and confidential or private content must not be used with AI.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
stuaff.fudan.edu.cn
it.fudan.edu.cn