Louisville, United States

University of Louisville

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

7 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for University of Louisville in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%

Valeur normalisée: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot_for_m365","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot","description":"University of Louisville provides or institutionally supports Microsoft 365 Copilot.","howToObtain":"Use UofL credentials and obtain the required paid licence.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Some tools require specific permissions or paid licenses (e.g., Microsoft 365 Copilot)

Affichage localisé only

Some tools require specific permissions or paid licenses (e.g., Microsoft 365 Copilot)

Preuve originale

Preuve 2
You need an active UofL login credentials

Affichage localisé only

You need an active UofL login credentials

Academic Integrity

The University of Louisville Delphi Center says current AI detection tools are unreliable, raise data privacy, FERPA, and student-consent risks, and should never be the sole basis for an academic integrity decision.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: ai_detection_not_sole_basis

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Current AI detection tools are unreliable and frequently produce false positives that disproportionately affect multilingual writers and students who use writing tools such as grammar checkers or the word prediction feature in Microsoft Word.

Affichage localisé only

The page says AI detection tools are unreliable and can produce false positives, especially affecting multilingual writers and users of writing tools.

Confidentialité

UofL ITS AI guidance states that federal privacy regulations and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework should be followed, and that users are individually responsible for misuse of systems and data mishandling involving student data, intellectual property, and protected personal information.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%

Valeur normalisée: ai_privacy_nist_user_responsibility

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
A fundamental mandate (and a legal requirement) is that federal privacy regulations and NIST AI risk management framework be followed.

Affichage localisé only

ITS says AI use should follow federal privacy regulations and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.

Enseignement

The University of Louisville Delphi Center frames generative and agentic AI as a teaching and assessment-design issue, advising instructors to design assessments so authentic engagement is more valuable than AI substitution rather than focusing on policing student behavior.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%

Valeur normalisée: teaching_guidance_assessment_design

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Rather than asking whether a student used AI, it asks whether the assessment is designed in a way that makes authentic engagement more valuable than AI substitution(Su et al., 2024).

Affichage localisé only

The guidance frames assessment design around making authentic engagement more valuable than AI substitution.

Enseignement

The University of Louisville Delphi Center provides sample syllabus statements for three generative AI approaches: not permitted, permitted with prior instructor permission and appropriate attribution and citation, or allowed without restrictions.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance87%

Valeur normalisée: sample_syllabus_ai_options

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Sample Statement 2: The use of Generative AI may be used with prior instructor permission and appropriate attribution and citation.

Affichage localisé only

One sample statement allows generative AI with prior instructor permission plus attribution and citation; the same page also lists no-use and unrestricted-use samples.

Source Status

UofL's Brand Identity site publishes an Artificial Intelligence Content Policy page for university brand communications, but the page explicitly states that it is a draft policy awaiting approval by the University of Louisville administration.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%

Valeur normalisée: draft_brand_ai_content_policy

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
This is a draft policy awaiting approval by the University of Louisville administration.

Affichage localisé only

The Brand AI Content Policy page is explicitly labeled as a draft awaiting approval.

Source Status

The UofL service catalog describes an AI / GenAI Tools access request service, but marks it as coming soon and not currently available; the described process would limit access to approved university platforms and use cases and require intended use, data sensitivity, and compliance considerations.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance84%

Valeur normalisée: coming_soon_ai_tools_access_service

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Coming Soon - Not Currently Available. The purpose of AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Generative AI Tool access request services is to provide the UofL community with a secure, compliant and supported process for requesting access to generative AI platforms and university-approved tools.

Affichage localisé only

The service page marks the AI / GenAI Tools access request service as coming soon and not currently available.

Source record

Sources officielles

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance97%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Louisville AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-louisville

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert