London, United Kingdom Dernière vérification

University College London (UCL)

Indépendant · Accès ouvert · N'est pas une page officielle de l'université

Que souhaitez-vous vérifier ?

Rechercher des universités

Explorer le dossier actuel par sujet

Travaux de cours et évaluations

Autorisé sous conditions

Suivre le dossier d'évaluation. La catégorie 1 exclut l'IA générative pendant la réalisation ; la catégorie 2 autorise une assistance limitée et critique tandis que l'étudiant reste l'auteur ; la catégorie 3 rend l'IA générative intégrale. Les catégories constituent des orientations. L'aide linguistique fait l'objet d'exceptions relatives aux compétences évaluées et au contenu de fond.

Source officielle ↗

Examens

Spécifique à l'évaluation

Les autorisations d'examen suivent la consigne de l'évaluation. Les examens en présentiel, les tests et les épreuves orales sont des exemples de la catégorie 1, et non une règle générale. Les évaluations orales ou surveillées CLIE relèvent de la catégorie 1, sauf indication contraire. Les dérogations individuelles d'assistance doivent être précisées.

Source officielle ↗

Déclaration

Mention requise

La mention est obligatoire chaque fois que l'IA générative a été utilisée comme outil fonctionnel pour aider à la création de travaux académiques (rédaction, planification, structuration). Une mention minimale doit comporter le nom et la version de l'outil, l'éditeur, l'URL et une phrase de contexte. Lorsque les styles de référencement standard (APA, Chicago) ou les directives départementales l'exigent, l'outil d'IA générative peut être cité comme auteur en plus de la mention fonctionnelle.

Source officielle ↗

Confidentialité et données sensibles

Vérifier les conditions spécifiques à la source

L'annonce de mars 2024 Copilot décrit la protection des données sous connexion UCL et recommande la prudence ; elle ne vérifie pas les paramètres actuels de conservation des comptes. Les étudiants doivent respecter les exigences de protection des données de l'UCL lorsqu'ils utilisent des données sensibles ; des autorisations ou des consentements peuvent être nécessaires.

Source officielle ↗

Outils approuvés

Accès soumis à conditions

UCL approuve Copilot et Studiosity. Studiosity fournit des retours illimités 24/7 sur la rédaction et le référencement via Moodle et affirme que les travaux des étudiants ne sont pas utilisés pour entraîner son IA. Son avis de confidentialité inclut les contenus de service conservés et le traitement à l'étranger. L'accès ne constitue pas une autorisation d'évaluation.

Source officielle ↗

Recherche et publication

Éditeur et spécifique à chaque diplôme

Les doctorants déclarent les contributions fonctionnelles externes, conservent la responsabilité et répondent aux questions de la soutenance sans l'aide de l'IA. UCL Press dispose de règles distinctes pour la paternité des œuvres, la divulgation et les images dans les livres et revues ; les exceptions méthodologiques pour les revues et les obligations des évaluateurs de livres par rapport à ceux de revues diffèrent.

Source officielle ↗
Autres sujets du dossier examiné

Intégrité académique

Suivez la procédure applicable

Critère de l'avantage injuste (Unfair advantage standard) en vertu de l'Academic Manual Section 9 ; épreuve orale d'enquête formelle (Investigatory Viva) en cas de suspicion d'infraction relative à la paternité de l'œuvre.

Source officielle ↗

Directives pédagogiques

Restrictions spécifiques aux tâches

Le personnel ne doit pas téléverser les travaux des étudiants dans des outils de détection d'IA ni dans des services d'IA générative ; la correction avec l'IA générative est déconseillée.

Source officielle ↗

Sécurité et achats

Partiellement documenté

Les identifiants institutionnels de Copilot et les déclarations de protection datées sont documentés ; le contrat d'achat actuel et les paramètres du locataire n'ont pas été vérifiés.

Source officielle ↗

Avant de soumettre

Faire

  • Suivre le dossier d'évaluation et clarifier les exceptions relatives aux technologies d'assistance.
    Conseils du site
  • Signalez l'aide fonctionnelle de l'IA en fournissant les détails requis.
    Exigence dans ce périmètre
  • Les candidats au doctorat devraient vérifier les exigences relatives à la déclaration et à la soutenance orale indépendante.
    Conseils du site

Ne pas faire

  • Ne présumez pas que la révision linguistique soit autorisée dans les travaux linguistiques évalués.
    Conseils du site
  • Le personnel ne doit pas téléverser les travaux des étudiants sur des services d'IA générative ou de détection.
    Exigence dans ce périmètre
  • N'appliquez pas les règles relatives aux images de l'édition de livres sans vérifier les exceptions méthodologiques des revues.
    Conseils du site

Utilisation de l'IA mise en doute ?

UCL

Lisez chaque règle citée au regard de son cours, de son unité académique, de son activité et de ses exceptions. Les conseils publiés sur le site ne créent pas d'obligation pour l'université.

Enquête et réponse

Pour une soutenance d'enquête, le secrétaire doit fournir la convocation, le rapport et les preuves au moins cinq jours ouvrés au préalable. La présence est obligatoire et la soutenance ne peut se tenir en l'absence de l'étudiant. L'organisation devrait avoir lieu dans les 20 jours ouvrés suivant le résultat de l'étape 1, à moins que des circonstances raisonnables ne l'empêchent. Les recours de l'étape 3 doivent être soumis dans les 10 jours ouvrés suivant la réception de la notification formelle. Les décisions sont normalement rendues dans les 20 jours ouvrés suivant la notification d'admissibilité, les recommandations étant soumises à la confirmation du jury d'examen.

Preuves originales et périmètre

Pour une soutenance d'enquête, le secrétaire doit fournir la convocation, le rapport et les preuves au moins cinq jours ouvrés au préalable. La présence est obligatoire et la soutenance ne peut se tenir en l'absence de l'étudiant. L'organisation devrait avoir lieu dans les 20 jours ouvrés suivant le résultat de l'étape 1, à moins que des circonstances raisonnables ne l'empêchent. Les recours de l'étape 3 doivent être soumis dans les 10 jours ouvrés suivant la réception de la notification formelle. Les décisions sont normalement rendues dans les 20 jours ouvrés suivant la notification d'admissibilité, les recommandations étant soumises à la confirmation du jury d'examen.

clm-ucl-genai-investigatory-viva-procedure-2026-27
In cases where authorship is in question (normally allegations of Contract Cheating and Misuse of GenAI), the Department/Faculty will organise an Investigatory Viva and the Secretary will prepare the paperwork and invite the student to attend.

Continuous extracted-text characters 15704–15947; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 135–135; characters 15704–15947; excerpt offset 0–243

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. The purpose of the Investigatory Viva is to establish the student’s authorship of the submitted work and make a decision on the case when it is Minor. For Major cases it is to determine whether there is prima facie evidence to support lack of authorship for further consideration at an Academic Misconduct Panel (via the Casework Team).

Continuous extracted-text characters 15950–16289; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 136–136; characters 15950–16289; excerpt offset 0–339

Source officielle de l'université ↗
4. The Secretary must provide the student with the following at least five working days before the scheduled Investigatory Viva:

Continuous extracted-text characters 16292–16420; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 137–137; characters 16292–16420; excerpt offset 0–128

Source officielle de l'université ↗
1. An invitation to the Investigatory Viva, outlining the date, time, and location.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16425–16508; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 138–138; characters 16425–16508; excerpt offset 0–83

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. A completed Student Academic Misconduct Report Form.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16513–16568; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 139–139; characters 16513–16568; excerpt offset 0–55

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. A copy of all documentary evidence relating to the case (i.e. the student’s submission).

Continuous extracted-text characters 16573–16664; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 140–140; characters 16573–16664; excerpt offset 0–91

Source officielle de l'université ↗
5. A student’s attendance at an Investigatory Viva is mandatory and cannot be conducted in their absence. Failure to attend will result in the actions under section 5 paragraph 16 and 17 being taken.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16667–16866; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 141–141; characters 16667–16866; excerpt offset 0–199

Source officielle de l'université ↗
6. An Investigatory Viva should be organised within 20 working days from the date of the Stage 1 outcome, unless there are reasonable circumstances that prevent this.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16869–17035; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 142–142; characters 16869–17035; excerpt offset 0–166

Source officielle de l'université ↗
7. The Investigatory Viva should be constituted as follows:

Continuous extracted-text characters 17038–17097; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 143–143; characters 17038–17097; excerpt offset 0–59

Source officielle de l'université ↗
1. Chair of the Board of Examiners owning the affected module, or appropriate nominee where there is a conflict of interest (acting as Chair).

Continuous extracted-text characters 17102–17244; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 144–144; characters 17102–17244; excerpt offset 0–142

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. At least two other members of staff from the Department not directly involved in the teaching of the affected module(s).

Continuous extracted-text characters 17249–17372; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 145–145; characters 17249–17372; excerpt offset 0–123

Source officielle de l'université ↗
8. The quorum for the Investigatory Viva must be three including the Chair.

Continuous extracted-text characters 17375–17450; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 146–146; characters 17375–17450; excerpt offset 0–75

Source officielle de l'université ↗
9. Where deemed necessary, a Departmental Representative who is competent to assess the student’s knowledge and understanding of the work or the allegation may be invited to attend in an advisory capacity. The Departmental Representative may, at the discretion of the Chair, ask the student questions, but will not be involved in the panel’s decision making.

Continuous extracted-text characters 17453–17811; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 147–147; characters 17453–17811; excerpt offset 0–358

Source officielle de l'université ↗
10. A decision will be made by the Investigatory Viva after their private deliberations and decide one of the following outcomes:

Continuous extracted-text characters 17814–17943; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 148–148; characters 17814–17943; excerpt offset 0–129

Source officielle de l'université ↗
1. No Further Action

Continuous extracted-text characters 17948–17968; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 149–149; characters 17948–17968; excerpt offset 0–20

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. To apply a penalty in line with Section 6 (where the allegation is Minor)

Continuous extracted-text characters 17973–18049; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 150–150; characters 17973–18049; excerpt offset 0–76

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. To refer to an Academic Misconduct Panel via Casework (where the Investigatory Viva is investigating a Major case)

Continuous extracted-text characters 18054–18171; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 151–151; characters 18054–18171; excerpt offset 0–117

Source officielle de l'université ↗
11. The decision of the Investigatory Viva will be by majority vote, and in the case of a tie, the Chair of the Investigatory Viva will have the casting vote.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18174–18332; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 152–152; characters 18174–18332; excerpt offset 0–158

Source officielle de l'université ↗
12. The Secretary should record the rationale for the decision and for any penalty applied.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18335–18426; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 153–153; characters 18335–18426; excerpt offset 0–91

Source officielle de l'université ↗
13. The Secretary should inform the student of the Investigatory Viva decision within five working days and record this on the module minutes in Portico.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18429–18582; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 154–154; characters 18429–18582; excerpt offset 0–153

Source officielle de l'université ↗
14. Students may appeal an Investigatory Viva penalty under Section 7: Stage 3 (Appeal Review).

Continuous extracted-text characters 18585–18680; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 155–155; characters 18585–18680; excerpt offset 0–95

Source officielle de l'université ↗
15. For Major Cases being investigated at an Investigatory Viva, if prima facie evidence of lack of authorship is found to exist, the findings and all the relevant documentation must be forwarded to the Secretary of the Academic Misconduct Panel via the Casework Team for adjudication.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18683–18968; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 156–156; characters 18683–18968; excerpt offset 0–285

Source officielle de l'université ↗
16. Where a student fails to attend a Viva, they may be referred to the Mandatory Faculty Interview process for a meeting with the Faculty. The purpose of the meeting is to outline the importance of engagement with the Academic Misconduct process. Following this meeting, the student will be sent a new date, time, and location of the rescheduled Viva. Alternatively, where the allegation is Minor and the student accepts the allegation, the Department may apply a penalty in line with Section 6.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18971–19467; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 157–157; characters 18971–19467; excerpt offset 0–496

Source officielle de l'université ↗
17. Continued non-engagement with the Viva process may result in Suspension or Termination of Studies via the Mandatory Faculty Interview process.

Continuous extracted-text characters 19470–19616; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 158–158; characters 19470–19616; excerpt offset 0–146

Source officielle de l'université ↗
5. A student’s attendance at an Investigatory Viva is mandatory and cannot be conducted in their absence. Failure to attend will result in the actions under section 5 paragraph 16 and 17 being taken.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16667–16866; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 141–141; characters 16667–16866; excerpt offset 0–199

Source officielle de l'université ↗
6. An Investigatory Viva should be organised within 20 working days from the date of the Stage 1 outcome, unless there are reasonable circumstances that prevent this.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16869–17035; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 142–142; characters 16869–17035; excerpt offset 0–166

Source officielle de l'université ↗
4. The Secretary must provide the student with the following at least five working days before the scheduled Investigatory Viva:

Continuous extracted-text characters 16292–16420; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 137–137; characters 16292–16420; excerpt offset 0–128

Source officielle de l'université ↗
An Appeal Review is a paper-based review of the decision made at either Stage 1 or Stage 2. An appeal against an Academic Misconduct decision will only be heard if it is based on one or more of the following grounds:

Continuous extracted-text characters 26453–26669; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 210–210; characters 26453–26669; excerpt offset 0–216

Source officielle de l'université ↗
1. The decision or panel process was not conducted in accordance with the procedures.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26674–26759; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 211–211; characters 26674–26759; excerpt offset 0–85

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. Fresh evidence has become available which was not available and could not reasonably be available for consideration during the decision or panel process.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26764–26920; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 212–212; characters 26764–26920; excerpt offset 0–156

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. The judgement of misconduct was not reasonable given the circumstances of the case.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26925–27011; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 213–213; characters 26925–27011; excerpt offset 0–86

Source officielle de l'université ↗
4. The penalty will have a significant impact on the student given their specific circumstances (this applies to decisions that lead to non-progression or suspension/termination of studies).

Continuous extracted-text characters 27016–27206; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 214–214; characters 27016–27206; excerpt offset 0–190

Source officielle de l'université ↗
##### Student Submission and Eligibility

Continuous extracted-text characters 27207–27247; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 215–215; characters 27207–27247; excerpt offset 0–40

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. Students must, within 10 working days of receiving formal notification of the decision, submit an appeal via the ‘UCL Student Academic Misconduct Procedure - Appeal Form†forms.office.com ’.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27250–27442; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 216–216; characters 27250–27442; excerpt offset 0–192

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. The Casework Team will conduct an eligibility review of the request. If it is determined that the request review does not fall within the grounds for review and/or does not meet the on-time criterion of 10 working days, the Casework Team will notify the student that the review request will not be taken forward. This means that a case will not progress to considerations at Stage 3 and a Completion of Procedures Letter will be issued.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27445–27884; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 217–217; characters 27445–27884; excerpt offset 0–439

Source officielle de l'université ↗
##### Consideration of Appeal Review

Continuous extracted-text characters 27885–27921; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 218–218; characters 27885–27921; excerpt offset 0–36

Source officielle de l'université ↗
4. If it is determined that the request review falls within the grounds for review, the case will be allocated to a member of the Casework Team, who is normally a Senior Casework Officer, for consideration.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27925–28131; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 220–220; characters 27925–28131; excerpt offset 0–206

Source officielle de l'université ↗
5. The paper-based review will be considered on the basis of the student’s written statement and supporting evidence.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28134–28251; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 221–221; characters 28134–28251; excerpt offset 0–117

Source officielle de l'université ↗
##### Appeal Review Outcome

Continuous extracted-text characters 28252–28279; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 222–222; characters 28252–28279; excerpt offset 0–27

Source officielle de l'université ↗
6. Following the investigation, the Stage 3 Appeal Review may be upheld, partially upheld or not upheld. This decision will normally be issued within 20 working days of the student having been informed that the case is eligible for review.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28282–28521; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 223–223; characters 28282–28521; excerpt offset 0–239

Source officielle de l'université ↗
7. If any aspect of the Stage 3 Appeal Review has been found upheld in full or in parts, then the outcome letter will make recommendations for what UCL will do to put things right. This decision may not be in line with the desired outcome as requested by the student. Recommendations by the Casework Team are subject to confirmation from the relevant Exam Board or equivalent academic body before implementation.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28524–28936; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 224–224; characters 28524–28936; excerpt offset 0–412

Source officielle de l'université ↗
8. Where a review request is not upheld, then the outcome letter will explain how that decision has been reached.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28939–29052; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 225–225; characters 28939–29052; excerpt offset 0–113

Source officielle de l'université ↗
9. If an appeal outcome leads to a necessary revision in a student’s certificate or transcript, the student must return any originals before updated versions can be issued.

Continuous extracted-text characters 29055–29227; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 226–226; characters 29055–29227; excerpt offset 0–172

Source officielle de l'université ↗
10. The outcome of the Stage 3 Review will conclude UCL’s consideration of the case and will be confirmed in the form of a Completion of Procedures letter.

Continuous extracted-text characters 29230–29385; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 227–227; characters 29230–29385; excerpt offset 0–155

Source officielle de l'université ↗

Résultats possibles

Les éléments actuellement conservés ne comprennent aucune procédure ni échéance précise vérifiée. Consultez le règlement universitaire applicable.

Examen et recours

Pour une soutenance d'enquête, le secrétaire doit fournir la convocation, le rapport et les preuves au moins cinq jours ouvrés au préalable. La présence est obligatoire et la soutenance ne peut se tenir en l'absence de l'étudiant. L'organisation devrait avoir lieu dans les 20 jours ouvrés suivant le résultat de l'étape 1, à moins que des circonstances raisonnables ne l'empêchent. Les recours de l'étape 3 doivent être soumis dans les 10 jours ouvrés suivant la réception de la notification formelle. Les décisions sont normalement rendues dans les 20 jours ouvrés suivant la notification d'admissibilité, les recommandations étant soumises à la confirmation du jury d'examen.

Preuves originales et périmètre

Pour une soutenance d'enquête, le secrétaire doit fournir la convocation, le rapport et les preuves au moins cinq jours ouvrés au préalable. La présence est obligatoire et la soutenance ne peut se tenir en l'absence de l'étudiant. L'organisation devrait avoir lieu dans les 20 jours ouvrés suivant le résultat de l'étape 1, à moins que des circonstances raisonnables ne l'empêchent. Les recours de l'étape 3 doivent être soumis dans les 10 jours ouvrés suivant la réception de la notification formelle. Les décisions sont normalement rendues dans les 20 jours ouvrés suivant la notification d'admissibilité, les recommandations étant soumises à la confirmation du jury d'examen.

clm-ucl-genai-investigatory-viva-procedure-2026-27
In cases where authorship is in question (normally allegations of Contract Cheating and Misuse of GenAI), the Department/Faculty will organise an Investigatory Viva and the Secretary will prepare the paperwork and invite the student to attend.

Continuous extracted-text characters 15704–15947; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 135–135; characters 15704–15947; excerpt offset 0–243

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. The purpose of the Investigatory Viva is to establish the student’s authorship of the submitted work and make a decision on the case when it is Minor. For Major cases it is to determine whether there is prima facie evidence to support lack of authorship for further consideration at an Academic Misconduct Panel (via the Casework Team).

Continuous extracted-text characters 15950–16289; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 136–136; characters 15950–16289; excerpt offset 0–339

Source officielle de l'université ↗
4. The Secretary must provide the student with the following at least five working days before the scheduled Investigatory Viva:

Continuous extracted-text characters 16292–16420; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 137–137; characters 16292–16420; excerpt offset 0–128

Source officielle de l'université ↗
1. An invitation to the Investigatory Viva, outlining the date, time, and location.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16425–16508; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 138–138; characters 16425–16508; excerpt offset 0–83

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. A completed Student Academic Misconduct Report Form.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16513–16568; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 139–139; characters 16513–16568; excerpt offset 0–55

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. A copy of all documentary evidence relating to the case (i.e. the student’s submission).

Continuous extracted-text characters 16573–16664; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 140–140; characters 16573–16664; excerpt offset 0–91

Source officielle de l'université ↗
5. A student’s attendance at an Investigatory Viva is mandatory and cannot be conducted in their absence. Failure to attend will result in the actions under section 5 paragraph 16 and 17 being taken.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16667–16866; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 141–141; characters 16667–16866; excerpt offset 0–199

Source officielle de l'université ↗
6. An Investigatory Viva should be organised within 20 working days from the date of the Stage 1 outcome, unless there are reasonable circumstances that prevent this.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16869–17035; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 142–142; characters 16869–17035; excerpt offset 0–166

Source officielle de l'université ↗
7. The Investigatory Viva should be constituted as follows:

Continuous extracted-text characters 17038–17097; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 143–143; characters 17038–17097; excerpt offset 0–59

Source officielle de l'université ↗
1. Chair of the Board of Examiners owning the affected module, or appropriate nominee where there is a conflict of interest (acting as Chair).

Continuous extracted-text characters 17102–17244; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 144–144; characters 17102–17244; excerpt offset 0–142

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. At least two other members of staff from the Department not directly involved in the teaching of the affected module(s).

Continuous extracted-text characters 17249–17372; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 145–145; characters 17249–17372; excerpt offset 0–123

Source officielle de l'université ↗
8. The quorum for the Investigatory Viva must be three including the Chair.

Continuous extracted-text characters 17375–17450; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 146–146; characters 17375–17450; excerpt offset 0–75

Source officielle de l'université ↗
9. Where deemed necessary, a Departmental Representative who is competent to assess the student’s knowledge and understanding of the work or the allegation may be invited to attend in an advisory capacity. The Departmental Representative may, at the discretion of the Chair, ask the student questions, but will not be involved in the panel’s decision making.

Continuous extracted-text characters 17453–17811; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 147–147; characters 17453–17811; excerpt offset 0–358

Source officielle de l'université ↗
10. A decision will be made by the Investigatory Viva after their private deliberations and decide one of the following outcomes:

Continuous extracted-text characters 17814–17943; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 148–148; characters 17814–17943; excerpt offset 0–129

Source officielle de l'université ↗
1. No Further Action

Continuous extracted-text characters 17948–17968; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 149–149; characters 17948–17968; excerpt offset 0–20

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. To apply a penalty in line with Section 6 (where the allegation is Minor)

Continuous extracted-text characters 17973–18049; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 150–150; characters 17973–18049; excerpt offset 0–76

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. To refer to an Academic Misconduct Panel via Casework (where the Investigatory Viva is investigating a Major case)

Continuous extracted-text characters 18054–18171; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 151–151; characters 18054–18171; excerpt offset 0–117

Source officielle de l'université ↗
11. The decision of the Investigatory Viva will be by majority vote, and in the case of a tie, the Chair of the Investigatory Viva will have the casting vote.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18174–18332; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 152–152; characters 18174–18332; excerpt offset 0–158

Source officielle de l'université ↗
12. The Secretary should record the rationale for the decision and for any penalty applied.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18335–18426; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 153–153; characters 18335–18426; excerpt offset 0–91

Source officielle de l'université ↗
13. The Secretary should inform the student of the Investigatory Viva decision within five working days and record this on the module minutes in Portico.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18429–18582; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 154–154; characters 18429–18582; excerpt offset 0–153

Source officielle de l'université ↗
14. Students may appeal an Investigatory Viva penalty under Section 7: Stage 3 (Appeal Review).

Continuous extracted-text characters 18585–18680; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 155–155; characters 18585–18680; excerpt offset 0–95

Source officielle de l'université ↗
15. For Major Cases being investigated at an Investigatory Viva, if prima facie evidence of lack of authorship is found to exist, the findings and all the relevant documentation must be forwarded to the Secretary of the Academic Misconduct Panel via the Casework Team for adjudication.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18683–18968; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 156–156; characters 18683–18968; excerpt offset 0–285

Source officielle de l'université ↗
16. Where a student fails to attend a Viva, they may be referred to the Mandatory Faculty Interview process for a meeting with the Faculty. The purpose of the meeting is to outline the importance of engagement with the Academic Misconduct process. Following this meeting, the student will be sent a new date, time, and location of the rescheduled Viva. Alternatively, where the allegation is Minor and the student accepts the allegation, the Department may apply a penalty in line with Section 6.

Continuous extracted-text characters 18971–19467; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 157–157; characters 18971–19467; excerpt offset 0–496

Source officielle de l'université ↗
17. Continued non-engagement with the Viva process may result in Suspension or Termination of Studies via the Mandatory Faculty Interview process.

Continuous extracted-text characters 19470–19616; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 158–158; characters 19470–19616; excerpt offset 0–146

Source officielle de l'université ↗
5. A student’s attendance at an Investigatory Viva is mandatory and cannot be conducted in their absence. Failure to attend will result in the actions under section 5 paragraph 16 and 17 being taken.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16667–16866; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 141–141; characters 16667–16866; excerpt offset 0–199

Source officielle de l'université ↗
6. An Investigatory Viva should be organised within 20 working days from the date of the Stage 1 outcome, unless there are reasonable circumstances that prevent this.

Continuous extracted-text characters 16869–17035; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 142–142; characters 16869–17035; excerpt offset 0–166

Source officielle de l'université ↗
4. The Secretary must provide the student with the following at least five working days before the scheduled Investigatory Viva:

Continuous extracted-text characters 16292–16420; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 137–137; characters 16292–16420; excerpt offset 0–128

Source officielle de l'université ↗
An Appeal Review is a paper-based review of the decision made at either Stage 1 or Stage 2. An appeal against an Academic Misconduct decision will only be heard if it is based on one or more of the following grounds:

Continuous extracted-text characters 26453–26669; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 210–210; characters 26453–26669; excerpt offset 0–216

Source officielle de l'université ↗
1. The decision or panel process was not conducted in accordance with the procedures.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26674–26759; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 211–211; characters 26674–26759; excerpt offset 0–85

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. Fresh evidence has become available which was not available and could not reasonably be available for consideration during the decision or panel process.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26764–26920; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 212–212; characters 26764–26920; excerpt offset 0–156

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. The judgement of misconduct was not reasonable given the circumstances of the case.

Continuous extracted-text characters 26925–27011; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 213–213; characters 26925–27011; excerpt offset 0–86

Source officielle de l'université ↗
4. The penalty will have a significant impact on the student given their specific circumstances (this applies to decisions that lead to non-progression or suspension/termination of studies).

Continuous extracted-text characters 27016–27206; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 214–214; characters 27016–27206; excerpt offset 0–190

Source officielle de l'université ↗
##### Student Submission and Eligibility

Continuous extracted-text characters 27207–27247; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 215–215; characters 27207–27247; excerpt offset 0–40

Source officielle de l'université ↗
2. Students must, within 10 working days of receiving formal notification of the decision, submit an appeal via the ‘UCL Student Academic Misconduct Procedure - Appeal Form†forms.office.com ’.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27250–27442; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 216–216; characters 27250–27442; excerpt offset 0–192

Source officielle de l'université ↗
3. The Casework Team will conduct an eligibility review of the request. If it is determined that the request review does not fall within the grounds for review and/or does not meet the on-time criterion of 10 working days, the Casework Team will notify the student that the review request will not be taken forward. This means that a case will not progress to considerations at Stage 3 and a Completion of Procedures Letter will be issued.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27445–27884; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 217–217; characters 27445–27884; excerpt offset 0–439

Source officielle de l'université ↗
##### Consideration of Appeal Review

Continuous extracted-text characters 27885–27921; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 218–218; characters 27885–27921; excerpt offset 0–36

Source officielle de l'université ↗
4. If it is determined that the request review falls within the grounds for review, the case will be allocated to a member of the Casework Team, who is normally a Senior Casework Officer, for consideration.

Continuous extracted-text characters 27925–28131; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 220–220; characters 27925–28131; excerpt offset 0–206

Source officielle de l'université ↗
5. The paper-based review will be considered on the basis of the student’s written statement and supporting evidence.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28134–28251; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 221–221; characters 28134–28251; excerpt offset 0–117

Source officielle de l'université ↗
##### Appeal Review Outcome

Continuous extracted-text characters 28252–28279; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 222–222; characters 28252–28279; excerpt offset 0–27

Source officielle de l'université ↗
6. Following the investigation, the Stage 3 Appeal Review may be upheld, partially upheld or not upheld. This decision will normally be issued within 20 working days of the student having been informed that the case is eligible for review.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28282–28521; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 223–223; characters 28282–28521; excerpt offset 0–239

Source officielle de l'université ↗
7. If any aspect of the Stage 3 Appeal Review has been found upheld in full or in parts, then the outcome letter will make recommendations for what UCL will do to put things right. This decision may not be in line with the desired outcome as requested by the student. Recommendations by the Casework Team are subject to confirmation from the relevant Exam Board or equivalent academic body before implementation.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28524–28936; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 224–224; characters 28524–28936; excerpt offset 0–412

Source officielle de l'université ↗
8. Where a review request is not upheld, then the outcome letter will explain how that decision has been reached.

Continuous extracted-text characters 28939–29052; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 225–225; characters 28939–29052; excerpt offset 0–113

Source officielle de l'université ↗
9. If an appeal outcome leads to a necessary revision in a student’s certificate or transcript, the student must return any originals before updated versions can be issued.

Continuous extracted-text characters 29055–29227; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 226–226; characters 29055–29227; excerpt offset 0–172

Source officielle de l'université ↗
10. The outcome of the Stage 3 Review will conclude UCL’s consideration of the case and will be confirmed in the form of a Completion of Procedures letter.

Continuous extracted-text characters 29230–29385; extracted text SHA256 498f1dd4ee276030c4d1a76c44ace35e5717203371918e639f79719294ab11bd; raw source SHA256 97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24; Lines 227–227; characters 29230–29385; excerpt offset 0–155

Source officielle de l'université ↗

Outils IA et accès

  • Microsoft CopilotRecommandation officielleAutorisé dans le périmètre de la source

    Connectez-vous avec vos identifiants UCL, comme décrit dans l'annonce officielle datée. Les paramètres actuels du locataire et les tarifs des licences n'ont pas été vérifiés.

  • StudiosityRecommandation officielleAutorisé dans le périmètre de la source

    Accès via Moodle UCL. Disponible 24/7 avec un nombre d'utilisations illimité pour les étudiants actuels de l'UCL.

Mises à jour du registre90 derniers jours · Mises à jour enregistrées : 2

Mises à jour de nos données vérifiées ; elles ne confirment pas un changement de politique de l’université.

  1. Mise à jour de page

    Autres enregistrements · Mise à jour de page

    Voir la révision

    Chargement de la révision…

  2. Ajout au registre · Correction du site

    Intégrité académique · Enseignement · 3 autres thèmes · Éléments concernés : 14 (6 corrigés / ajustés · 8 ajoutés)

    Voir la révision

    Chargement de la révision…

Affirmations examinées

14

Sources officielles

11 URL officielles ; 12 attributions de sources et leurs versions capturées conservées.

A more secure generative AI tool is now available for staff and students

www.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

UCL News

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

A more secure generative AI tool is now available for staff and students ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

225db72a7f327fd54b853d3dea0095f3e0655c09f0b40516f8921d5858d8336c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

Generative AI Hub | Teaching & Learning - UCL

www.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

UCL Arena Centre for Research-based Education

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

Generative AI Hub | Teaching & Learning - UCL ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

18a8d649f6ef529ede562cfe8f034500720b556a31107d5b5d82b5fd45ecb7d9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

Generative AI and assessments | Students - UCL

www.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

UCL Student Success Office

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

Generative AI and assessments | Students - UCL ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

aca9199e7db83a8e6bd3ba947c9bf2a1ceb2fbf8d752db06c157b7291173477b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

Three categories of GenAI use in assessment | Teaching & Learning - UCL

www.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

UCL Arena Centre for Research-based Education

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

Three categories of GenAI use in assessment | Teaching & Learning - UCL ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

5c0f82611cc2a15cc6f0666c7890c3fe12d2e8d6822cc772614846b71b82748e

Three categories of GenAI use in assessment · 2026-10-13T03:40:00.629405Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

e21955a74be27d67527c578ccfd0c3586a85fc7732cfd5c5341057bf4d6984e1

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

UCL Studiosity academic writing support

www.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

UCL Studiosity academic writing support · 2026-10-13T03:40:00.484395Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

e74285262ee9af8b8658ebf829be84893f07a04b9d28909ab2b13ecec8f3d9aa

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

UCL Student Academic Misconduct Procedure

www.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

UCL Student Academic Misconduct Procedure · 2026-10-13T03:40:00.535115Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

97114660c0e65fc06ff570e282c03f4527d950b6fa1a21ba4db875a44b777b24

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

CLIE Policy on Student Use of Generative AI 2026–27

www.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

CLIE Policy on Student Use of Generative AI 2026–27 · 2026-10-13T03:40:01.599636Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

6856bec84ba8b0a5a6fb11938c473841c4ef20c7d81e390fa185ef65f5f3072b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

Acknowledging and referencing GenAI - References, citations and avoiding plagiarism - Library Skills

library-guides.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

UCL Library Services

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

Acknowledging and referencing GenAI - References, citations and avoiding plagiarism - Library Skills ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

466868b9d731487b01a3aee5b446db1bb2b1650867cfdda876d12c8c2bfa9b93

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

UCL Press AI policy for book authors

uclpress.co.uk

Source officielle de l’université

UCL Press

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

UCL Press AI policy for book authors ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

f712b332b51fc52f19199d1b5a7ad87fb07e15a60ac9fade66be53b9a8b36c3e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

UCL Press Journals Editorial Policies

uclpress.co.uk

Source officielle de l’université

UCL Press

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

UCL Press Journals Editorial Policies ·

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3512c3c6e2292ab0d9df628f6ae43bc9b6516a8c6c75e0baad43cbc778280fdb

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗

Transparency, authorship and generative AI in doctoral research

www.ucl.ac.uk

Source officielle de l’université

Empreinte (hash) et version capturée

Transparency, authorship and generative AI in doctoral research · 2026-10-13T03:40:00.410033Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

bb3df48b37cb0d363ce2f26f4798b3b71f44c27bd2aa885f6b02438f40232914

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Source officielle ↗
Informations sur la notice, JSON et citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Révision du dossier
v6-audit-fix-20261014
Version du jeu de données
public-release-20260924-002
Correction publiée
Résumé étudiant
Non publié
JSON actuel examiné · Base historique

Published scoped record correction; current JSON and MCP use the same reviewed record, while the previous baseline is retained in history. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • La conservation actuelle des données locataires dans Copilot, l'entraînement, la tarification des licences et les détails contractuels n'ont pas été vérifiés ; les déclarations datées conservent un caractère explicitement historique.
  • Deux allégations disciplinaires générales initiales restent maintenues séparément de la politique relative aux évaluations sommatives.
  • enforcement:ucl:ucl-disciplinary-investigation-notice-deadline
  • enforcement:ucl:ucl-disciplinary-appeal-committee-format
      Current reviewed JSON
      Questions fréquentes

      Questions fréquentes

      Puis-je utiliser l’IA pour mes travaux ?

      Suivre le dossier d'évaluation. La catégorie 1 exclut l'IA générative pendant la réalisation ; la catégorie 2 autorise une assistance limitée et critique tandis que l'étudiant reste l'auteur ; la catégorie 3 rend l'IA générative intégrale. Les catégories constituent des orientations. L'aide linguistique fait l'objet d'exceptions relatives aux compétences évaluées et au contenu de fond.

      Voir les preuves →
      Faut-il déclarer l’utilisation de l’IA ?

      La mention est obligatoire chaque fois que l'IA générative a été utilisée comme outil fonctionnel pour aider à la création de travaux académiques (rédaction, planification, structuration). Une mention minimale doit comporter le nom et la version de l'outil, l'éditeur, l'URL et une phrase de contexte. Lorsque les styles de référencement standard (APA, Chicago) ou les directives départementales l'exigent, l'outil d'IA générative peut être cité comme auteur en plus de la mention fonctionnelle.

      Voir les preuves →
      Puis-je envoyer des données sensibles ?

      L'annonce de mars 2024 Copilot décrit la protection des données sous connexion UCL et recommande la prudence ; elle ne vérifie pas les paramètres actuels de conservation des comptes. Les étudiants doivent respecter les exigences de protection des données de l'UCL lorsqu'ils utilisent des données sensibles ; des autorisations ou des consentements peuvent être nécessaires.

      Voir les preuves →
      Quels outils sont accessibles ?

      UCL approuve Copilot et Studiosity. Studiosity fournit des retours illimités 24/7 sur la rédaction et le référencement via Moodle et affirme que les travaux des étudiants ne sont pas utilisés pour entraîner son IA. Son avis de confidentialité inclut les contenus de service conservés et le traitement à l'étranger. L'accès ne constitue pas une autorisation d'évaluation.

      Voir les preuves →
      Quelles règles s’appliquent aux examens ?

      Les autorisations d'examen suivent la consigne de l'évaluation. Les examens en présentiel, les tests et les épreuves orales sont des exemples de la catégorie 1, et non une règle générale. Les évaluations orales ou surveillées CLIE relèvent de la catégorie 1, sauf indication contraire. Les dérogations individuelles d'assistance doivent être précisées.

      Voir les preuves →
      Quelles règles pour la recherche et la publication ?

      Les doctorants déclarent les contributions fonctionnelles externes, conservent la responsabilité et répondent aux questions de la soutenance sans l'aide de l'IA. UCL Press dispose de règles distinctes pour la paternité des œuvres, la divulgation et les images dans les livres et revues ; les exceptions méthodologiques pour les revues et les obligations des évaluateurs de livres par rapport à ceux de revues diffèrent.

      Voir les preuves →
      Quels usages relèvent de la fraude académique ?

      Critère de l'avantage injuste (Unfair advantage standard) en vertu de l'Academic Manual Section 9 ; épreuve orale d'enquête formelle (Investigatory Viva) en cas de suspicion d'infraction relative à la paternité de l'œuvre.

      Voir les preuves →
      Quelles recommandations pour l’enseignement ?

      Le personnel ne doit pas téléverser les travaux des étudiants dans des outils de détection d'IA ni dans des services d'IA générative ; la correction avec l'IA générative est déconseillée.

      Voir les preuves →
      Quelles exigences de sécurité et d’achat ?

      Les identifiants institutionnels de Copilot et les déclarations de protection datées sont documentés ; le contrat d'achat actuel et les paramètres du locataire n'ont pas été vérifiés.

      Voir les preuves →
      Quand ce dossier a-t-il été vérifié ?

      Vérification:

      Version →
      Quelles sources officielles étayent ces règles ?Source officielle →
      Où lire toutes les preuves ?

      14 · Preuves complètes

      Preuves complètes →