University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API indexGitHub repo

London, United Kingdom

UCL

UCL is listed as QS 2026 rank 9. UCL has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Last checkedMay 5, 2026Last changedMay 5, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Public JSONCitation rulesDataset access

Citation-ready overview

v1 public contract

UCL is listed as QS 2026 rank 9. UCL has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Reviewed claims5Candidate claims0Official sources2

Candidate claims are source-backed records pending review. They are not final policy conclusions and are not legal or academic integrity advice.

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed public claim

Academic Integrity

UCL uses a 3-category assessment framework for GenAI: Category 1 requires own work only; Category 2 permits GenAI with acknowledgement; Category 3 includes essential GenAI use as part of the assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last changed
May 5, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
For Category 1, you might use GenAI tools to help you revise and prepare, but the work you complete for the assessment should be your own. In Category 2, you could use GenAI to get ideas, help draft your work, or even proofread... Category 3 is a lot like category 2, but there will also be some essential use of GenAI.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c30c4bfc90ed4cc7d54295e9225da1f4733f69c3706007c7b3fda5b06ec1cc67

Ai Tool Treatment

UCL designates Microsoft Copilot as its approved GenAI tool due to its enhanced data protection, positioning it as a more secure alternative to other GenAI services.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last changed
May 5, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Microsoft Copilot is our approved GenAI tool because of its enhanced data protection. This tool is a more secure and safer alternative to other GenAI services.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
18a8d649f6ef529ede562cfe8f034500720b556a31107d5b5d82b5fd45ecb7d9

Academic Integrity

UCL defines academic misconduct in the context of GenAI as gaining an unfair advantage over other students; there is no single list of fair and unfair uses as it depends on the assessment category.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last changed
May 5, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Academic integrity is about fairness. If somebody gets an unfair advantage over other students, we consider this academic misconduct. This means that there's no single list of fair and unfair uses of GenAI.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c30c4bfc90ed4cc7d54295e9225da1f4733f69c3706007c7b3fda5b06ec1cc67

Teaching

UCL provides Studiosity, a GenAI-powered service available 24/7 to all current students at all levels of study, to support academic writing and referencing skills.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last changed
May 5, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
UCL offers a service called Studiosity to support students with their academic writing and referencing skills. The platform uses GenAI and is available 24/7 to all current students, at all levels of study.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
18a8d649f6ef529ede562cfe8f034500720b556a31107d5b5d82b5fd45ecb7d9

Academic Integrity

UCL permits using GenAI to help with spelling, grammar, and language tone in assessments, but it must not change the content and meaning of what the student has written.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%
Last changed
May 5, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
It's okay to use GenAI to help with spelling and grammar, and even with the tone of your language. However, make sure it isn't changing the content and meaning of what you've written. You should always understand the work you submit.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c30c4bfc90ed4cc7d54295e9225da1f4733f69c3706007c7b3fda5b06ec1cc67

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Back to universities