Chicago, United States

Illinois Institute of Technology

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

5 reviewed claims

Source Status

Illinois Tech publishes official Academic Affairs guidance on academic honesty and generative AI, and related Center for Learning Innovation resources for teaching and learning with AI.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%

Valeur normalisée: official_ai_guidance_found

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
This guideline on academic honesty and generative AI is intended to provide guidance for both students and faculty on engaging with generative AI productively, while still maintaining a rigorous and honest academic environment.

Academic Integrity

Illinois Tech's Academic Affairs guidance ties permitted use of generative AI or other outside resources to each course's learning objectives and syllabus expectations.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%

Valeur normalisée: ai_use_course_objective_dependent

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
This means that each syllabus needs to clearly define what the learning objectives are and be clear as to what is and is not allowed in terms of "outside" resources to demonstrate proficiency with that learning objective.

Academic Integrity

Illinois Tech guidance says misrepresenting proficiency by submitting someone else's product, directly or indirectly, is academic dishonesty.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: misrepresentation_dishonesty

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Therefore, misrepresentation of proficiency by (getting either directly or indirectly someone else’s) product is dishonesty. It cheats the student of their needed personal development, and it is academic dishonesty, which results in disciplinary action.

Enseignement

Illinois Tech's Center for Learning Innovation asks faculty to provide clear syllabus expectations for AI use and provides suggested syllabus language for no, some, and significant AI use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: syllabus_ai_expectations_guidance

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
In the interest of transparency and academic integrity, faculty are asked to ensure their syllabus provides students with clear expectations regarding the use of AI in their courses. Below are recommended statements dependent on instructor expectations.

Enseignement

Illinois Tech's suggested AI and assessment syllabus language says AI-assisted grading support should be explicitly stated in assignment instructions when such tools are used, with final grading oversight retained by the instructor.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%

Valeur normalisée: ai_assisted_grading_disclosure_sample_language

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
"While I may use AI-assisted tools to support the grading process and provide formative feedback, this will be explicitly stated in the assignment instructions whenever such tools are used. Regardless of the tools involved, please be assured that I maintain final oversight, review, and ultimate responsibility for all assigned grades."

Source record

Sources officielles

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance93%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Illinois Institute of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 17, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/illinois-institute-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert