Chicago, United States

Illinois Institute of Technology

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

5 reviewed claims

Source Status

Illinois Tech publishes official Academic Affairs guidance on academic honesty and generative AI, and related Center for Learning Innovation resources for teaching and learning with AI.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: official_ai_guidance_found

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
This guideline on academic honesty and generative AI is intended to provide guidance for both students and faculty on engaging with generative AI productively, while still maintaining a rigorous and honest academic environment.

Academic Integrity

Illinois Tech's Academic Affairs guidance ties permitted use of generative AI or other outside resources to each course's learning objectives and syllabus expectations.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność92%

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_use_course_objective_dependent

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
This means that each syllabus needs to clearly define what the learning objectives are and be clear as to what is and is not allowed in terms of "outside" resources to demonstrate proficiency with that learning objective.

Academic Integrity

Illinois Tech guidance says misrepresenting proficiency by submitting someone else's product, directly or indirectly, is academic dishonesty.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność91%

Wartość znormalizowana: misrepresentation_dishonesty

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Therefore, misrepresentation of proficiency by (getting either directly or indirectly someone else’s) product is dishonesty. It cheats the student of their needed personal development, and it is academic dishonesty, which results in disciplinary action.

Nauczanie

Illinois Tech's Center for Learning Innovation asks faculty to provide clear syllabus expectations for AI use and provides suggested syllabus language for no, some, and significant AI use.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność91%

Wartość znormalizowana: syllabus_ai_expectations_guidance

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
In the interest of transparency and academic integrity, faculty are asked to ensure their syllabus provides students with clear expectations regarding the use of AI in their courses. Below are recommended statements dependent on instructor expectations.

Nauczanie

Illinois Tech's suggested AI and assessment syllabus language says AI-assisted grading support should be explicitly stated in assignment instructions when such tools are used, with final grading oversight retained by the instructor.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność88%

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_assisted_grading_disclosure_sample_language

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
"While I may use AI-assisted tools to support the grading process and provide formative feedback, this will be explicitly stated in the assignment instructions whenever such tools are used. Regardless of the tools involved, please be assured that I maintain final oversight, review, and ultimate responsibility for all assigned grades."

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność93%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Illinois Institute of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 17, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/illinois-institute-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian