University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Chicago, United States

Illinois Institute of Technology

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =591UpdatedMay 17, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed claims

Source Status

Illinois Tech publishes official Academic Affairs guidance on academic honesty and generative AI, and related Center for Learning Innovation resources for teaching and learning with AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: official_ai_guidance_found

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This guideline on academic honesty and generative AI is intended to provide guidance for both students and faculty on engaging with generative AI productively, while still maintaining a rigorous and honest academic environment.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
418b8f20…
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Guideline on Academic Honesty and Generative AI

Academic Integrity

Illinois Tech's Academic Affairs guidance ties permitted use of generative AI or other outside resources to each course's learning objectives and syllabus expectations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: ai_use_course_objective_dependent

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This means that each syllabus needs to clearly define what the learning objectives are and be clear as to what is and is not allowed in terms of "outside" resources to demonstrate proficiency with that learning objective.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
418b8f20…
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
General Policy: Academic Honesty and Learning Objectives are Directly Related

Academic Integrity

Illinois Tech guidance says misrepresenting proficiency by submitting someone else's product, directly or indirectly, is academic dishonesty.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: misrepresentation_dishonesty

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Therefore, misrepresentation of proficiency by (getting either directly or indirectly someone else’s) product is dishonesty. It cheats the student of their needed personal development, and it is academic dishonesty, which results in disciplinary action.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
418b8f20…
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
General Policy: Academic Honesty and Learning Objectives are Directly Related

Teaching

Illinois Tech's Center for Learning Innovation asks faculty to provide clear syllabus expectations for AI use and provides suggested syllabus language for no, some, and significant AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: syllabus_ai_expectations_guidance

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
In the interest of transparency and academic integrity, faculty are asked to ensure their syllabus provides students with clear expectations regarding the use of AI in their courses. Below are recommended statements dependent on instructor expectations.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7c0f2c12…
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Suggested Syllabus Language

Teaching

Illinois Tech's suggested AI and assessment syllabus language says AI-assisted grading support should be explicitly stated in assignment instructions when such tools are used, with final grading oversight retained by the instructor.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: ai_assisted_grading_disclosure_sample_language

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
"While I may use AI-assisted tools to support the grading process and provide formative feedback, this will be explicitly stated in the assignment instructions whenever such tools are used. Regardless of the tools involved, please be assured that I maintain final oversight, review, and ultimate responsibility for all assigned grades."
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7c0f2c12…
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Suggested Syllabus Language: AI and Assessment

Source record

Official sources

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence93%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Illinois Institute of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 17, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/illinois-institute-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log