University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Wageningen University & Research

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims7Sources6Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Wageningen University & Research currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Wageningen University & Research. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Wageningen University & Research combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+14-0
11 # Wageningen University & Research AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: The Wageningen University Examining Board rules treat AI-created ready-made assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud unless AI use is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and adequately documented.
3+Evidence (en, 98810d0e1bee): Any use of artificial intelligence (AI) to create ready-made content of an assignment is considered an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud, unless the use of AI is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and the use of AI has been documented adequately.
4+privacy: WUR's student GenAI rules warn that content fed into external GenAI tools may be stored indefinitely and tell students never to put others' personal data, intellectual-property-infringing information, or sensitive or confidential research data into a public GenAI tool.
5+Evidence (en, 3d7718ac8c6d): Anything that you feed into external GenAI tools like ChatGPT may be stored by the company indefinitely and might be used in unspecified ways. Never put (personal) data of others, information that infringes on intellectual property rights or sensitive or confidential (research) data into a chatbot or any other public GenAI tool.
6+academic_integrity: WUR's student GenAI rules tell students to check the course guide for whether and how GenAI is permitted; if the guide has no information, using GenAI to generate assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud, including for theses.
7+Evidence (en, 3d7718ac8c6d): Always check your course guide in Brightspace to understand whether, and to what extent, GenAI is permitted in your coursework. If there is no information in your course guide, using GenAI to generate the content of your assignments is not allowed and can be considered as an irregularity or even fraud. This also applies for theses; seek guidance from your lecturer or supervisor.
8+academic_integrity: WUR's student GenAI rules say students are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as their own or fabricate research data, and they must be transparent about GenAI's role in submitted work.
9+Evidence (en, 3d7718ac8c6d): You are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as your own or fabricate research data. Doing so constitutes academic fraud. When using GenAI tools, be transparent about their role in your work. You are ultimately responsible for the content you submit and for the accuracy and integrity of your work.
10+research: Wageningen University's MSc Thesis Course Guide says AI is in principle allowed for brainstorming, text feedback, code/script development, literature searching, and transcription, but only under conditions including skill support rather than replacement, student accountability, acknowledgement/documentation, data restrictions, copyright respect, and verification of code.
11+Evidence (en, e2e4ef08b119): In principle, the use of AI is allowed as/for: Sparring partner / Brainstorming; Feedback tool for textual improvement; Data processing script development; Literature searching; Transcription. Under the conditions that the use of AI may only be in support of the development of these skills and not a replacement of these skills; students remain accountable; and use must be acknowledged or documented.
12+source_status: Wageningen University's 2025-2026 Student Charter page lists Rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI as a code-of-conduct resource and says the charter comprises student rights and obligations.
13+Evidence (en, 99d8db2cb9a1): The Student Charter 2025-2026 comprises the rights and obligations of Wageningen University students. The codes of conduct table lists Rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI and describes it as a description of the rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI in education.
14+research: WUR Library guidance says AI use should be documented, AI should not be cited as a source or author, publisher policies should be checked for writing and publishing, and peer reviewers should not upload non-published manuscripts into externally hosted tools.
15+Evidence (en, 733aa4a45ba5): It is important to always document your use of AI. In addition, do not cite AI as if it were a source or an author. WUR Library urges you to be transparent in your use of AI tools and to always check a publisher's policy before including AI-generated content in your publication. For confidentiality and proprietary reasons, WUR Library advises reviewers never to upload a non-published manuscript into any externally hosted tool.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

7 claim records

research

WUR Library guidance says AI use should be documented, AI should not be cited as a source or author, publisher policies should be checked for writing and publishing, and peer reviewers should not upload non-published manuscripts into externally hosted tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Wageningen University's MSc Thesis Course Guide says AI is in principle allowed for brainstorming, text feedback, code/script development, literature searching, and transcription, but only under conditions including skill support rather than replacement, student accountability, acknowledgement/documentation, data restrictions, copyright respect, and verification of code.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

The Wageningen University Examining Board rules treat AI-created ready-made assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud unless AI use is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and adequately documented.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

WUR's student GenAI rules warn that content fed into external GenAI tools may be stored indefinitely and tell students never to put others' personal data, intellectual-property-infringing information, or sensitive or confidential research data into a public GenAI tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

WUR's student GenAI rules say students are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as their own or fabricate research data, and they must be transparent about GenAI's role in submitted work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

WUR's student GenAI rules tell students to check the course guide for whether and how GenAI is permitted; if the guide has no information, using GenAI to generate assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud, including for theses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Wageningen University's 2025-2026 Student Charter page lists Rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI as a code-of-conduct resource and says the charter comprises student rights and obligations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

6 source attributions