课程作业与考核使用
遵守教师和课程的要求
人工智能的使用取决于授课教师和学术单位。法学院默认即使注明引用也禁止提交由人工智能撰写的文章;生物科学部(BSD)要求计分作业必须事先获得批准;哈里斯公共政策学院仅在其列出的条件下允许提供协助。
课程作业与考核使用University of Chicago
遵守教师和课程的要求
状态与适用范围
状态适用于下列来源列明的范围及条件;完整英文说明与原文保留如下。
人工智能的使用取决于授课教师和学术单位。法学院默认即使注明引用也禁止提交由人工智能撰写的文章;生物科学部(BSD)要求计分作业必须事先获得批准;哈里斯公共政策学院仅在其列出的条件下允许提供协助。
官方原文证据
6 个来源 · 跳转至某一来源
Academic Honesty & Plagiarism | Student Manual | The University of Chicago
来源版本
b6c268e47db0d8514d0270d43ca94c462910d654c1479edf20ff44948806ea68
The use of artificial intelligence (AI; including Large Language Models and related technologies) writing and research tools may or may not constitute academic dishonesty, depending on the rules for AI use established by the instructor of record. Any doubts about what constitutes appropriate use should be addressed to the instructor.
主张与定位详情
人工智能写作和研究工具是否构成学术不端,取决于课程正式登记的授课教师的规定。学生对适当使用存有疑问的,应向该授课教师咨询。
clm-uchicago-central-instructor-assessment-rules
Academic Honesty & Plagiarism; normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 1069:1404
b6c268e47db0d8514d0270d43ca94c462910d654c1479edf20ff44948806ea68
Using Generative AI to Support Your Learning as a Student | University of Chicago
来源版本
691ba892fa7187d9900c13e211900d59d91d3b576989c961b55b667d8993f7fd
Always refer to the instructors’ guidance on when and how generative artificial intelligence may be used in course work. Instructors may opt to limit or otherwise specify when AI tools are and are not permitted. AI usage policies may vary from course to course. Always follow the instructors’ guidance and if you are unclear about what is allowed, please ask your instructor for clarification.
主张与定位详情
芝加哥大学学生指南要求学生遵守任课教师关于何时以及如何在作业与考核中使用 AI 的规定。课程政策可能有所不同;学生在不明确时应主动询问。
clm-uchicago-student-coursework-guidance
When Can I Use Generative AI to Support My Learning?; normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 1772:2165
691ba892fa7187d9900c13e211900d59d91d3b576989c961b55b667d8993f7fd
4.9 Law School Policy on Generative AI | University of Chicago Law School
来源版本
fb400eb25c004fc4e0a5df0521fe1e46d320641d29ee391714d87f6c92e002bb
b) For all work that a student submits for any form of academic credit, AI may not be used, whether with or without attribution, in a way that would constitute academic plagiarism if the AI were a human author whose work was used without attribution . Commentary: The crux of this policy, which applies in any context in which a student submits work for evaluation, is the application of existing academic integrity policies. Thus, some but not all uses of AI in preparing work to submit for a class would violate this default policy. Using AI to brainstorm ideas for a paper—akin to asking a search engine (like Google), professors, or professional contacts for
主张与定位详情
根据法学院的默认规定,提交作业中的AI使用被视同于未注明出处地使用他人作品。头脑风暴或校对等某些用途可以符合规定;即使注明出处,由AI撰写论文的全部或部分内容也违反该默认规定。
clm-uchicago-law-submitted-work-default
Law §4.9(1)(b); normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 7818:8480
fb400eb25c004fc4e0a5df0521fe1e46d320641d29ee391714d87f6c92e002bb
suggestions—would not violate this default policy. Nor would using AI for proofreading. The principle here is that if AI is performing a task that other technologies (or people) currently perform, and such uses are not a violation of academic integrity, then those uses of AI do not violate the default policy. In contrast, using AI to compose part or all of a paper, or copying or paraphrasing output from AI and passing it off as one’s own writing, would violate this default policy. The same principle applies here: if AI is performing a task that other technologies (or people) currently perform, and such uses are a violation of academic integrity, then those uses of AI do
主张与定位详情
根据法学院的默认规定,提交作业中的AI使用被视同于未注明出处地使用他人作品。头脑风暴或校对等某些用途可以符合规定;即使注明出处,由AI撰写论文的全部或部分内容也违反该默认规定。
clm-uchicago-law-submitted-work-default
Law §4.9(1)(b); normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 8481:9159
fb400eb25c004fc4e0a5df0521fe1e46d320641d29ee391714d87f6c92e002bb
violate the default policy. The default policy sweeps more broadly than a prohibition against academic plagiarism, however. A student cannot avoid limits on the use of AI that would otherwise apply by attributing their work to AI. It is not plagiarism to copy or paraphrase another’s work, so long as one properly cites that source. But under the default policy, the use of AI with or without attribution is compared to the use of a human-created source without attribution . Thus, using AI to compose all or part of a paper, even if the use of generative AI is fully documented in properly placed footnotes , is a violation of the default policy.
主张与定位详情
根据法学院的默认规定,提交作业中的AI使用被视同于未注明出处地使用他人作品。头脑风暴或校对等某些用途可以符合规定;即使注明出处,由AI撰写论文的全部或部分内容也违反该默认规定。
clm-uchicago-law-submitted-work-default
Law §4.9(1)(b); normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 9160:9807
fb400eb25c004fc4e0a5df0521fe1e46d320641d29ee391714d87f6c92e002bb
Instructors have flexibility to set policy for the use of AI in their classes. The Law School sets a default for use of AI, but each instructor can set their own policies. 3. Deviations from the default policy shall be stated in writing in the syllabus posted on Canvas for the class. The goal of this aspect of the policy is to ensure that all parties have advance notice of the policies that apply to them, and that those policies are as clear as practicable.
主张与定位详情
法学院教师可制定不同的 AI 政策。对默认规则的偏离必须在发布于 Canvas 的教学大纲中以书面形式予以说明。
clm-uchicago-law-written-course-exceptions
Law §4.9(2)-(3); normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 9811:10272
fb400eb25c004fc4e0a5df0521fe1e46d320641d29ee391714d87f6c92e002bb
Guidance on Generative AI Use | UChicago Biosciences | The University of Chicago
来源版本
81cec0c732341af92fbbdc092a06514489f63d5f1b2e93ef2af649c67a1c0417
As a general rule, students should not rely on generative AI for graded coursework or examinations, unless their instructor, program, or committee has approved that use in advance.
主张与定位详情
在生物科学部(BSD)博士和硕士项目中,除非教师、项目或委员会已预先批准使用,否则学生在计分作业或考试中不应依赖生成式 AI。
clm-uchicago-bsd-assessment-prior-approval
BSD Academic Integrity and Assessment; normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 3797:3977
81cec0c732341af92fbbdc092a06514489f63d5f1b2e93ef2af649c67a1c0417
Student Handbook & Policies | Harris School of Public Policy | The University of Chicago
来源版本
180d7b8c06a978ce317ba5baf4ba50b8c43edf50529493408293be990b060f34
Students are allowed to utilize AI tools for their coursework if all of the following conditions are met The course/instructor does not have a policy against use of AI tools for that class or on that assignment The AI tool is used as an aid, not as a substitute for the learning outcomes the assignment is intended to reach. When utilizing AI content generation software or other AI tools, students are required to appropriately acknowledge the use of these tools by citing the specific AI program(s) employed in their work in the bibliography or elsewhere on the assignment. Students should provide detail about how the AI was utilized – prompts used etc. Students should save
主张与定位详情
哈里斯学院仅在课程/教师未予禁止、AI 支持而非替代学习、引用了具体程序且学生核实了准确性的情况下,才允许在课程作业中借助 AI 辅助。学生应在被要求时说明使用情况并保存原始输出。
clm-uchicago-harris-coursework-conditions
Harris Courses: Artificial Intelligence Use in Academic Work; normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 16835:17512
180d7b8c06a978ce317ba5baf4ba50b8c43edf50529493408293be990b060f34
the full original AI generated text as a separate file in case the instructor requests to see it. Failing to cite use of AI constitutes academic dishonesty. The student takes full responsibility for checking AI generated content for accuracy.
主张与定位详情
哈里斯学院仅在课程/教师未予禁止、AI 支持而非替代学习、引用了具体程序且学生核实了准确性的情况下,才允许在课程作业中借助 AI 辅助。学生应在被要求时说明使用情况并保存原始输出。
clm-uchicago-harris-coursework-conditions
Harris Courses: Artificial Intelligence Use in Academic Work; normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 17513:17755
180d7b8c06a978ce317ba5baf4ba50b8c43edf50529493408293be990b060f34
Departmental Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy | The University of Chicago Division of the Social Sciences
来源版本
a059fcd047b8e27d1fa03b4bc32c6726f2b03e873494cb73f266837e32f112aa
Faculty and instructors will specify their policies and expectations regarding the use of AI through a syllabus statement. In the absence of such a statement, the assumption will be that any use of generative AI in the class is prohibited.
主张与定位详情
历史系教师在课程大纲中规定课堂 AI 政策。若课程大纲未作说明,系里默认课堂上禁止使用生成式 AI。
clm-uchicago-history-default-ai-prohibition
History Departmental AI Policy, default; normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 2731:2970
a059fcd047b8e27d1fa03b4bc32c6726f2b03e873494cb73f266837e32f112aa





