Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
5 claim records
NCKU academic-integrity guidance says faculty, students, and researchers should verify generative-AI outputs, and that using generative AI for plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification breaches academic integrity; students should follow course rules and should not submit AI-generated content as their own without permission.
NCKU guidance says faculty, students, and researchers using generative AI in research should work to ensure reproducibility and stability of research results and appropriately disclose the AI tool name, version, date, and method of use.
NCKU guidance tells faculty, students, and researchers not to provide unpublished research or sensitive content to generative AI, notes that shared data may be retained as training data, and says generative AI should be avoided in confidential research activities such as peer review or research-proposal review.
NCKU guidance says generative AI can assist with brainstorming, literature review, and manuscript polishing, but cannot replace critical thinking, decision-making, or interpretation; generative AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, and the author/user remains fully responsible for the work.
NCKU guidance says generative-AI acceptance, use, and ethical considerations differ by discipline; faculty, students, and researchers should respect disciplinary differences and confirm a target journal's generative-AI policy before submission.
2 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 12:29 PM
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 12:30 PM