Change log

National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)

Tracker history: 0 release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

5 current claims; 2 official sources.

This page combines all public release diffs for National Cheng Kung University (NCKU). Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Tracker claim text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Recorded text comparisons

Only recorded comparisons with an exact Claim ID match are shown.

No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.

Release history

Tracker history: 0 release records.

Current claim records

Current claim records: 5.

academic_integrity

NCKU academic-integrity guidance says faculty, students, and researchers should verify generative-AI outputs, and that using generative AI for plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification breaches academic integrity; students should follow course rules and should not submit AI-generated content as their own without permission.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

research

NCKU guidance says faculty, students, and researchers using generative AI in research should work to ensure reproducibility and stability of research results and appropriately disclose the AI tool name, version, date, and method of use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

privacy

NCKU guidance tells faculty, students, and researchers not to provide unpublished research or sensitive content to generative AI, notes that shared data may be retained as training data, and says generative AI should be avoided in confidential research activities such as peer review or research-proposal review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

research

NCKU guidance says generative AI can assist with brainstorming, literature review, and manuscript polishing, but cannot replace critical thinking, decision-making, or interpretation; generative AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, and the author/user remains fully responsible for the work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

research

NCKU guidance says generative-AI acceptance, use, and ethical considerations differ by discipline; faculty, students, and researchers should respect disciplinary differences and confirm a target journal's generative-AI policy before submission.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

Source snapshots

Official source records: 2.

國立成功大學生成式 AI 於教學研究的學術誠信指引

official_pdf Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 12:30 PM

Snapshot hash
d1f3c57b629d01e2293810bacee5717ff52b82d614e71d26f2c55fc4ddfe119f