New Haven, United States 上次查核時間

Yale University

獨立 · 開放存取 · 非官方大學頁面

您想檢查什麼?

搜尋大學

依主題探索目前紀錄

課程作業

有條件允許

授課教師會在課程大綱中明確說明允許的 AI 使用方式。除非獲得明確授權,否則學生不得在作業評量或考核評量中使用 AI 工具。

官方來源 ↗

考試

有條件允許

考試期間是否可使用生成式 AI,由各授課教師在課程政策與教學大綱中決定;除非獲得授課教師授權,否則不得使用 AI。全校並無通用的概括許可,除非課程大綱另有規定,也不要求強制性的書面格式。

官方來源 ↗

披露

必填

耶魯大學文理研究生院(GSAS)的學生必須妥善註明提交作品中所用的AI生成文字,並遵守各學院就其他AI協助所訂的特定規定。他們必須能夠解釋其研究及寫作過程,包括應要求時提供草稿紀錄。這是 GSAS 的規定,並非適用於耶魯所有學生的統一披露規則。

官方來源 ↗

隱私與敏感資料

受限

耶魯大學 2023 年九月教務長指引表示,不得將機密、受法律限制、中度風險或高度風險的耶魯資料輸入 AI 工具。現行機構目錄另外列出各服務的資料分類,包括 Clarity 適用於具特殊 ePHI 與 DUA 條件的高度風險資料,而 Radiate 網路搜尋僅限低度風險資料。請遵守各服務的存取限制及適用的資料協議;這些分類並不能確定每個資料集的授權。

官方來源 ↗

機構工具

有條件允許

耶魯大學提供包括 Microsoft Copilot、Clarity 和 Claude Enterprise 在內的機構工具,並在帳戶控制下允許使用 Zoom AI Companion。工具的可用性並不賦予學術評量許可。

官方來源 ↗

研究與發表

受限

耶魯大學圖書館指引要求,在使用授權電子資源時若使用生成式 AI,必須遵守廠商授權協議;這些協議通常禁止商業性文字與資料探勘,或將內容輸入外部 AI 模型。

官方來源 ↗
更多已審閱的紀錄主題

學術誠信與程序

受限

未經適當註明而將AI生成內容插入提交的作業,構成學術誠信違規。根據GSAS 2026–2027標準,研究生在課程作業或研究中使用AI之前,必須諮詢相關教師,並須準備好在被要求時說明及展示其撰寫過程;但並無普遍規定要求所有學生都須記錄每一則提示詞(prompt)。紀律處分事宜由規章與紀律委員會處理;學生的書面陳述通常須於兩週內提交。

官方來源 ↗

教學指引

建議

耶魯 Poorvu 中心的指引及教務長指令確認,教師在各自課程內擁有完全權限,可決定學生在完成作業時是否可以及如何使用 AI。預期教員會就允許的 AI 使用及註明出處的要求提供清楚指示,並鼓勵教師按其特定課程與學習目標,調整耶魯範本政策。

官方來源 ↗

安全與採購

需要審閱

耶魯大學教務長指引請有意採購 AI 產品的人員,先行審查該工具,以確保其符合校方資訊安全要求。Poorvu 中心指引明定,課堂上使用 AI 必須遵守 FERPA,且授課教師不得要求學生為耶魯未直接授權的工具建立外部帳號。

官方來源 ↗

提交前

應做事項

  • 繳交前,請審閱各課程的課程大綱,並就允許的 AI 寫作輔助方式諮詢授課教師。
    本範圍要求
  • 就 GSAS 學術工作而言,應依適用的 GSAS 標準與課程規則所要求,標示並註明所允許的生成式 AI 協助。
    本範圍要求
  • GSAS 標準期望學生能夠展示並清晰說明其作品背後的過程,包括研究、起草和寫作歷程;這並非保留每一份 AI 對話紀錄的要求。
    來源指引

請勿

  • 除非授課教師明確授權,否則不得在課程作業或考試中使用生成式 AI 工具。
    本範圍要求
  • 請閱讀耶魯大學2023年九月教務長(Provost)的警示:不得將受保護的耶魯資料輸入任何 AI 工具,並應同時遵守現行機構目錄中各服務的特定限制;不得將目錄存取權限視為對所有資料集的授權。
    來源指引
  • 請勿將 Clarity Radiate 用於中度或高風險資料,因為搜尋查詢會傳送至外部模型。
    來源指引

AI 使用受到質疑?

Yale University

教務長生成式 AI 指引;GSAS 個人行為及學術誠信標準;GSAS 紀律委員會程序;耶魯圖書館電子資源授權建議。機構審核仍為 PARTIAL。

調查與回應

依 GSAS 規章與紀律委員會程序,學生通常被要求於兩週內以書面回應指控。聽證由至少四名成員組成的小組進行(包括通常無表決權的書記;其中含至少一名學生的三名有表決權成員即構成法定人數)。決定以不記名投票方式、依優勢證據標準作出;委員會向院長建議處分,由院長決定懲處。紀律決定立即生效。學生可於委員會作出決定後最遲五個工作日內,向覆審委員會提出書面申訴。覆審委員會(三名成員)可決定不予處理,或要求重新審議;重新審議時,若學生先前已獲免責,委員會不得認定其有過錯,亦不得加重處分。適用範圍僅限研究生院(GSAS);研究不端行為依研究不端程序移送處理;大學部案件則依耶魯學院執行委員會另行訂定的程序處理。

原始證據與範圍

依 GSAS 規章與紀律委員會程序,學生通常被要求於兩週內以書面回應指控。聽證由至少四名成員組成的小組進行(包括通常無表決權的書記;其中含至少一名學生的三名有表決權成員即構成法定人數)。決定以不記名投票方式、依優勢證據標準作出;委員會向院長建議處分,由院長決定懲處。紀律決定立即生效。學生可於委員會作出決定後最遲五個工作日內,向覆審委員會提出書面申訴。覆審委員會(三名成員)可決定不予處理,或要求重新審議;重新審議時,若學生先前已獲免責,委員會不得認定其有過錯,亦不得加重處分。適用範圍僅限研究生院(GSAS);研究不端行為依研究不端程序移送處理;大學部案件則依耶魯學院執行委員會另行訂定的程序處理。

draft-claim-yale-gsas-discipline-committee-procedure
Student statement. Students will be asked to respond in writing to the allegation. Providing a written statement allows the student to present their perspective on events and any broader context or other information that will help the Coordinating Group and committee to better understand the situation. Written statements will ordinarily be due to the secretary two weeks after the student receives notification of the charge. In their statement, students should admit or deny allegations against them. In some cases, the student may admit responsibility for some portion of the allegations and deny others.

Procedures: Student statement response deadline

大學官方來源 ↗
A hearing panel will have a minimum of four members, including the secretary (or dean’s designate) who does not typically vote. Voting members of the panel must include the chair or vice chair, one faculty member and/or dean of the graduate school, and one student member. The presence of three voting members will constitute a quorum, provided that at least one student member is present. A majority vote will decide questions before the hearing panel. In the event of a tie vote, the secretary or other committee designee will cast a deciding vote.

Procedures: Section A.2.c Hearing panel & quorum

大學官方來源 ↗
Determination. At the conclusion of the hearing, the committee will meet in an executive session to decide whether the conduct reported in fact occurred and whether it contravened the standards cited in the charge. The committee’s decision will be made by a simple majority of voting members present. The secretary will vote only in the event of a tie. This decision will be made by a preponderance of the evidence, voted on by secret ballot, and will be final.

Procedures: Section C.8 Determination & quorum voting

大學官方來源 ↗
If the committee decides that the conduct reported occurred and that it contravened the standards cited in the charge, based on the seriousness of the contravention, the committee will also recommend a sanction, if any, to the dean. The dean may either impose the recommended sanction or a lesser or greater one at their discretion.

Procedures: Section C.8 Sanction recommendation to dean

大學官方來源 ↗
The Committee of Review will receive written appeals from a student or students who have been assigned a penalty. An appeal must be received by the Committee of Review no later than five business days after the decision of the committee and may be sent to the secretary. To review such appeals, the Committee of Review will have access to all the written records of the committee.

Procedures: Section C.10.2 Appeal deadline to Committee of Review

大學官方來源 ↗

可能的結果

依 GSAS 規章與紀律委員會程序,學生通常被要求於兩週內以書面回應指控。聽證由至少四名成員組成的小組進行(包括通常無表決權的書記;其中含至少一名學生的三名有表決權成員即構成法定人數)。決定以不記名投票方式、依優勢證據標準作出;委員會向院長建議處分,由院長決定懲處。紀律決定立即生效。學生可於委員會作出決定後最遲五個工作日內,向覆審委員會提出書面申訴。覆審委員會(三名成員)可決定不予處理,或要求重新審議;重新審議時,若學生先前已獲免責,委員會不得認定其有過錯,亦不得加重處分。適用範圍僅限研究生院(GSAS);研究不端行為依研究不端程序移送處理;大學部案件則依耶魯學院執行委員會另行訂定的程序處理。

原始證據與範圍

依 GSAS 規章與紀律委員會程序,學生通常被要求於兩週內以書面回應指控。聽證由至少四名成員組成的小組進行(包括通常無表決權的書記;其中含至少一名學生的三名有表決權成員即構成法定人數)。決定以不記名投票方式、依優勢證據標準作出;委員會向院長建議處分,由院長決定懲處。紀律決定立即生效。學生可於委員會作出決定後最遲五個工作日內,向覆審委員會提出書面申訴。覆審委員會(三名成員)可決定不予處理,或要求重新審議;重新審議時,若學生先前已獲免責,委員會不得認定其有過錯,亦不得加重處分。適用範圍僅限研究生院(GSAS);研究不端行為依研究不端程序移送處理;大學部案件則依耶魯學院執行委員會另行訂定的程序處理。

draft-claim-yale-gsas-discipline-committee-procedure
Student statement. Students will be asked to respond in writing to the allegation. Providing a written statement allows the student to present their perspective on events and any broader context or other information that will help the Coordinating Group and committee to better understand the situation. Written statements will ordinarily be due to the secretary two weeks after the student receives notification of the charge. In their statement, students should admit or deny allegations against them. In some cases, the student may admit responsibility for some portion of the allegations and deny others.

Procedures: Student statement response deadline

大學官方來源 ↗
A hearing panel will have a minimum of four members, including the secretary (or dean’s designate) who does not typically vote. Voting members of the panel must include the chair or vice chair, one faculty member and/or dean of the graduate school, and one student member. The presence of three voting members will constitute a quorum, provided that at least one student member is present. A majority vote will decide questions before the hearing panel. In the event of a tie vote, the secretary or other committee designee will cast a deciding vote.

Procedures: Section A.2.c Hearing panel & quorum

大學官方來源 ↗
Determination. At the conclusion of the hearing, the committee will meet in an executive session to decide whether the conduct reported in fact occurred and whether it contravened the standards cited in the charge. The committee’s decision will be made by a simple majority of voting members present. The secretary will vote only in the event of a tie. This decision will be made by a preponderance of the evidence, voted on by secret ballot, and will be final.

Procedures: Section C.8 Determination & quorum voting

大學官方來源 ↗
If the committee decides that the conduct reported occurred and that it contravened the standards cited in the charge, based on the seriousness of the contravention, the committee will also recommend a sanction, if any, to the dean. The dean may either impose the recommended sanction or a lesser or greater one at their discretion.

Procedures: Section C.8 Sanction recommendation to dean

大學官方來源 ↗
The Committee of Review will receive written appeals from a student or students who have been assigned a penalty. An appeal must be received by the Committee of Review no later than five business days after the decision of the committee and may be sent to the secretary. To review such appeals, the Committee of Review will have access to all the written records of the committee.

Procedures: Section C.10.2 Appeal deadline to Committee of Review

大學官方來源 ↗

審核與申訴

依 GSAS 規章與紀律委員會程序,學生通常被要求於兩週內以書面回應指控。聽證由至少四名成員組成的小組進行(包括通常無表決權的書記;其中含至少一名學生的三名有表決權成員即構成法定人數)。決定以不記名投票方式、依優勢證據標準作出;委員會向院長建議處分,由院長決定懲處。紀律決定立即生效。學生可於委員會作出決定後最遲五個工作日內,向覆審委員會提出書面申訴。覆審委員會(三名成員)可決定不予處理,或要求重新審議;重新審議時,若學生先前已獲免責,委員會不得認定其有過錯,亦不得加重處分。適用範圍僅限研究生院(GSAS);研究不端行為依研究不端程序移送處理;大學部案件則依耶魯學院執行委員會另行訂定的程序處理。

原始證據與範圍

依 GSAS 規章與紀律委員會程序,學生通常被要求於兩週內以書面回應指控。聽證由至少四名成員組成的小組進行(包括通常無表決權的書記;其中含至少一名學生的三名有表決權成員即構成法定人數)。決定以不記名投票方式、依優勢證據標準作出;委員會向院長建議處分,由院長決定懲處。紀律決定立即生效。學生可於委員會作出決定後最遲五個工作日內,向覆審委員會提出書面申訴。覆審委員會(三名成員)可決定不予處理,或要求重新審議;重新審議時,若學生先前已獲免責,委員會不得認定其有過錯,亦不得加重處分。適用範圍僅限研究生院(GSAS);研究不端行為依研究不端程序移送處理;大學部案件則依耶魯學院執行委員會另行訂定的程序處理。

draft-claim-yale-gsas-discipline-committee-procedure
Student statement. Students will be asked to respond in writing to the allegation. Providing a written statement allows the student to present their perspective on events and any broader context or other information that will help the Coordinating Group and committee to better understand the situation. Written statements will ordinarily be due to the secretary two weeks after the student receives notification of the charge. In their statement, students should admit or deny allegations against them. In some cases, the student may admit responsibility for some portion of the allegations and deny others.

Procedures: Student statement response deadline

大學官方來源 ↗
A hearing panel will have a minimum of four members, including the secretary (or dean’s designate) who does not typically vote. Voting members of the panel must include the chair or vice chair, one faculty member and/or dean of the graduate school, and one student member. The presence of three voting members will constitute a quorum, provided that at least one student member is present. A majority vote will decide questions before the hearing panel. In the event of a tie vote, the secretary or other committee designee will cast a deciding vote.

Procedures: Section A.2.c Hearing panel & quorum

大學官方來源 ↗
Determination. At the conclusion of the hearing, the committee will meet in an executive session to decide whether the conduct reported in fact occurred and whether it contravened the standards cited in the charge. The committee’s decision will be made by a simple majority of voting members present. The secretary will vote only in the event of a tie. This decision will be made by a preponderance of the evidence, voted on by secret ballot, and will be final.

Procedures: Section C.8 Determination & quorum voting

大學官方來源 ↗
If the committee decides that the conduct reported occurred and that it contravened the standards cited in the charge, based on the seriousness of the contravention, the committee will also recommend a sanction, if any, to the dean. The dean may either impose the recommended sanction or a lesser or greater one at their discretion.

Procedures: Section C.8 Sanction recommendation to dean

大學官方來源 ↗
The Committee of Review will receive written appeals from a student or students who have been assigned a penalty. An appeal must be received by the Committee of Review no later than five business days after the decision of the committee and may be sent to the secretary. To review such appeals, the Committee of Review will have access to all the written records of the committee.

Procedures: Section C.10.2 Appeal deadline to Committee of Review

大學官方來源 ↗

AI工具與存取

  • Claude Enterprise官方建議適用條件

    教職員透過 Software at Yale 提交申請並填寫扣款 COA。學生無法直接申請;必須由學院或系所贊助授權。

  • Copilot Chat官方建議在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    以耶魯電子郵件地址登入;學生請使用學生專屬 Copilot 入口點。

  • GitHub Copilot官方建議適用條件

    請透過 Yale ServiceNow 申請存取權限。

  • Microsoft 365 Copilot官方建議適用條件

    請透過 Yale ServiceNow 申請存取權限。

  • Microsoft 365 Copilot Studio官方建議適用條件

    需要為 Microsoft 365 Copilot 提交 Yale ServiceNow 存取申請。

  • Power BI Copilot官方建議在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    請遵循 Yale 的 Power BI Copilot 存取路徑。

  • Google Gemini for Education官方建議在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    使用耶魯大學 Google Workspace (EliApps) 帳戶登入。

  • NotebookLM官方建議在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    使用耶魯大學 Google Workspace (EliApps) 帳戶登入。

  • Azure AI官方建議適用條件

    請透過 Yale Data 提交 AI 申請審查。

  • BeaconAI官方建議適用條件

    YaleSites 使用者可為其符合資格的網站申請 BeaconAI。

  • Clarity Platform官方建議在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    使用 Clarity Platform Chat 服務。

  • Consensus官方建議在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    使用符合資格的耶魯電子郵件或耶魯 Google Workspace 帳戶建立帳戶。

  • Portkey官方建議在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    請使用耶魯大學的 Portkey 概覽及存取路徑。

  • Teams Premium官方建議適用條件

    請透過 Yale ServiceNow 申請存取權限。

  • Zoom AI Companion官方建議在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    對具有 Zoom 帳號的使用者預設為啟用。

  • AWS Bedrock官方建議適用條件

    請透過 Yale Data 提交 AI 申請審查。

  • ChatGPT已提及該工具;所審查的材料未確立機構存取權限可用性尚未確立
  • Microsoft Copilot Chat已提及該工具;所審查的材料未確立機構存取權限可用性尚未確立
紀錄更新最近90天 · 已記錄的更新:6

此為本網站已審查紀錄的更新,並不代表大學已變更其政策。

部分紀錄未經核實日期。請參閱完整歷史。

  1. 頁面更新

    其他紀錄 · 頁面更新

    檢視修訂版本

    正在載入修訂版本…

  2. 紀錄維護

    其他紀錄 · 紀錄維護

    檢視修訂版本

    正在載入修訂版本…

  3. 網站更正

    學術誠信 · Records involved: 1 (1 corrected / adjusted)

    檢視修訂版本

    正在載入修訂版本…

已審查的聲明

31

官方來源

11 個官方網址;12 項來源出處及其擷取版本已保留。

Academic Dishonesty - Handbook for Instructors

catalog.yale.edu

大學官方來源

catalog.yale.edu

雜湊值與擷取版本

Academic Dishonesty - Handbook for Instructors · 2026-05-10T12:22:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

6c6927aa24affa230b5ceb4af47b3a08a59066c510d1513e0dce0673d3266c71

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Academic Integrity and Detection

poorvucenter.yale.edu

大學官方來源

poorvucenter.yale.edu

雜湊值與擷取版本

Academic Integrity and Detection · 2026-05-10T12:20:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

bbac849b9594a8b457ebd0c8224ec47bebaf0c91521ec2c599bf202c7faeff14

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

AI Guidance for Students

poorvucenter.yale.edu

大學官方來源

poorvucenter.yale.edu

雜湊值與擷取版本

AI Guidance for Students · 2026-05-10T12:18:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d1e2823bce0f284b85c61bdc815a4681c5a623d73b9a0e856aac9941b498942f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

AI Guidance for Teachers

poorvucenter.yale.edu

大學官方來源

poorvucenter.yale.edu

雜湊值與擷取版本

AI Guidance for Teachers · 2026-05-10T12:17:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

a3ce5f7b43936c954d51d5f07634d49a5e05b4eff8d060d9d98b82dd99ccc91c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI Tools

provost.yale.edu

大學官方來源

provost.yale.edu

雜湊值與擷取版本

Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI Tools · 2026-05-10T12:15:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

cf53048e544a5a3db3804780e6f5dee6ac15d4c8dc4fadf2ade6fbb0d858019c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Guiding Principles for Teaching and Learning with AI

poorvucenter.yale.edu

大學官方來源

poorvucenter.yale.edu

雜湊值與擷取版本

Guiding Principles for Teaching and Learning with AI · 2026-05-10T12:16:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

2cd0d46503913e910859a794afe1c351afa0cde76be5e070238fab0f331128a7

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Protecting Student Privacy and Your Data

poorvucenter.yale.edu

大學官方來源

poorvucenter.yale.edu

雜湊值與擷取版本

Protecting Student Privacy and Your Data · 2026-05-10T12:21:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

43854432f3c071ffabf46609ad4e79ebe87c3e9a6cd35e1ec63d8872fe38900c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Yale's AI Tools and Resources

ai.yale.edu

大學官方來源

ai.yale.edu

雜湊值與擷取版本

Yale's AI Tools and Resources · 2026-05-10T12:19:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

688e40fe08017e2e91008e9857dbd02a5828c7093f086e0d9eb4a1e517de516d

Yale’s AI Tools and Resources | AI at Yale · 2026-07-15T20:04:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

529ab9fe322c198cc342617552a496d0a19b6c299f365139c6556e93d7a0f3e5

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Now Available: Claude Enterprise Licenses at Yale | AI at Yale

ai.yale.edu

大學官方來源

AI at Yale / Yale Information Technology Services (ITS)

雜湊值與擷取版本

Now Available: Claude Enterprise Licenses at Yale | AI at Yale · 2026-10-18T22:44:09Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

cf97813121b444bfef3b9930bacab4de3df8f5c86ca60a8da14b16d122a2c045

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Personal Conduct and Academic Integrity Standards < Yale University

catalog.yale.edu

大學官方來源

Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS), Yale University

雜湊值與擷取版本

Personal Conduct and Academic Integrity Standards < Yale University · 2026-10-18T22:44:09Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

60a34db804984939b942a115805a86e92e807df6117fff835519f322dff20acd

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Introduction - AI Guidance for Library Resources - Research Guides at Yale Library

guides.library.yale.edu

大學官方來源

Yale University Library

雜湊值與擷取版本

Introduction - AI Guidance for Library Resources - Research Guides at Yale Library · 2026-10-18T22:44:09Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

e82ee378da39deef132e51ff4bad7dfb04160da5fc4953c173494e2862293588

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗
紀錄資訊、JSON 與引用格式

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs20-24-v6-r7-20261020
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

          Current reviewed JSON
          學生提出的問題

          學生提出的問題

          我可以在課程作業中使用 AI 嗎?

          授課教師會在課程大綱中明確說明允許的 AI 使用方式。除非獲得明確授權,否則學生不得在作業評量或考核評量中使用 AI 工具。

          檢視證據 →
          我需要揭露 AI 的使用嗎?

          耶魯大學文理研究生院(GSAS)的學生必須妥善註明提交作品中所用的AI生成文字,並遵守各學院就其他AI協助所訂的特定規定。他們必須能夠解釋其研究及寫作過程,包括應要求時提供草稿紀錄。這是 GSAS 的規定,並非適用於耶魯所有學生的統一披露規則。

          檢視證據 →
          我可以上傳敏感資料嗎?

          耶魯大學 2023 年九月教務長指引表示,不得將機密、受法律限制、中度風險或高度風險的耶魯資料輸入 AI 工具。現行機構目錄另外列出各服務的資料分類,包括 Clarity 適用於具特殊 ePHI 與 DUA 條件的高度風險資料,而 Radiate 網路搜尋僅限低度風險資料。請遵守各服務的存取限制及適用的資料協議;這些分類並不能確定每個資料集的授權。

          檢視證據 →
          我可以存取哪些工具?

          耶魯大學提供包括 Microsoft Copilot、Clarity 和 Claude Enterprise 在內的機構工具,並在帳戶控制下允許使用 Zoom AI Companion。工具的可用性並不賦予學術評量許可。

          檢視證據 →
          考試規則是什麼?

          考試期間是否可使用生成式 AI,由各授課教師在課程政策與教學大綱中決定;除非獲得授課教師授權,否則不得使用 AI。全校並無通用的概括許可,除非課程大綱另有規定,也不要求強制性的書面格式。

          檢視證據 →
          研究與出版適用哪些規定?

          耶魯大學圖書館指引要求,在使用授權電子資源時若使用生成式 AI,必須遵守廠商授權協議;這些協議通常禁止商業性文字與資料探勘,或將內容輸入外部 AI 模型。

          檢視證據 →
          什麼行為算是學術不端?

          未經適當註明而將AI生成內容插入提交的作業,構成學術誠信違規。根據GSAS 2026–2027標準,研究生在課程作業或研究中使用AI之前,必須諮詢相關教師,並須準備好在被要求時說明及展示其撰寫過程;但並無普遍規定要求所有學生都須記錄每一則提示詞(prompt)。紀律處分事宜由規章與紀律委員會處理;學生的書面陳述通常須於兩週內提交。

          檢視證據 →
          哪些指引適用於教學?

          耶魯 Poorvu 中心的指引及教務長指令確認,教師在各自課程內擁有完全權限,可決定學生在完成作業時是否可以及如何使用 AI。預期教員會就允許的 AI 使用及註明出處的要求提供清楚指示,並鼓勵教師按其特定課程與學習目標,調整耶魯範本政策。

          檢視證據 →
          適用哪些安全與採購要求?

          耶魯大學教務長指引請有意採購 AI 產品的人員,先行審查該工具,以確保其符合校方資訊安全要求。Poorvu 中心指引明定,課堂上使用 AI 必須遵守 FERPA,且授課教師不得要求學生為耶魯未直接授權的工具建立外部帳號。

          檢視證據 →
          此紀錄何時經過核查?

          已核查紀錄:

          紀錄版本 →
          哪些官方來源支援這些規則?官方來源 →
          在哪裡可以閱讀完整證據?

          31 · 完整政策證據

          完整政策證據 →