Bern, Switzerland

University of Bern

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources3Source languagede, enPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-bern.json

Policy profile

Coverage score90/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Coursework

No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Exams

University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

University of Bern IT Services says organization units may procure AI services themselves, but for AI systems not listed on the Generative KIs page, personal data, official or professional-secret data, and especially sensitive personal or research data must not be entered; only information intended for the public or otherwise without legal protection requirements is allowed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: unlisted_ai_systems_no_personal_official_secret_sensitive_data

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Organisationseinheiten (OE) koennen KI Dienstleistungen eigenstaendig beschaffen. Fuer, auf dieser Seite nicht aufgefuehrte Systeme, gelten aber folgende Vorgaben: Es duerfen keine personenbezogenen Daten eingegeben werden. Es duerfen keine Amts- und/oder durch das Berufsgeheimnis geschuetzten Daten eingegeben werden. Es duerfen keine besonders schuetzenswerten Personen- und/oder Forschungsdaten eingegeben werden.

Localized display only

For AI systems not listed on the page, organization units may procure AI services themselves, but personal, official/professional-secret, and especially sensitive personal or research data may not be entered.

Academic Integrity

The University of Bern Institute of Art History AI teaching guidelines say student work and exams at the institute must remain students' own work and may not be replaced by AI-tool work; AI tools may support independent work, use must be marked with the tool, prompt, scope, and purpose, and incorrect logging, citation, and referencing of AI-tool use in written work is regarded as plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: ikg_student_ai_use_independent_work_disclosure_plagiarism

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Studentische Arbeiten und Pruefungen muessen eigenstaendige Leistungen der Studierenden sein. Diese duerfen nicht durch Arbeiten von KI-Tools ersetzt werden. ... Die Nutzung von KI-Tools muss gekennzeichnet werden. Hierbei muss ... angegeben werden, welches Tool, mit welchem Prompt, in welchem Umfang und zu welchem Zweck eingesetzt wurde.

Localized display only

Student work and exams must remain students' own work and may not be replaced by AI-tool work; AI-tool use must be marked with tool, prompt, scope, and purpose.

Security Review

University of Bern IT Services says that if an organization unit needs to enter and process covered data in AI systems, it must prepare an ISDS concept in advance and have it reviewed by the University of Bern CISO, legal service, and the Canton of Bern data protection supervisory authority; this also applies before processing official/professional-secret data or especially sensitive personal or research data in listed systems.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_system_sensitive_data_requires_isds_ciso_legal_data_protection_review

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Sollte ein Bedarf zur Eingabe und Verarbeitung einer Teilmenge der oben genannten Daten bestehen, so ist durch die beschaffende Organisationseinheit vorgaengig ein ISDS Konzept zu erstellen und dieses durch den CISO und Rechtsdienst der Universitaet Bern, sowie die Datenschutzaufsichtsstelle des Kantons Bern zu pruefen.

Localized display only

If covered data need to be entered and processed, the procuring organization unit must prepare an ISDS concept in advance and have it reviewed by UniBE CISO, legal service, and the Canton of Bern data-protection authority.

Research

The University Library Bern GenAI step-by-step guide frames responsible GenAI use as a 14-question decision process that includes checking whether GenAI use is allowed for the task, whether confidential data are protected, whether use is documented for transparent disclosure, whether UniBE procurement and data-protection guidance has been read, and whether the user remains responsible for research output.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: library_genai_decision_guide_allowed_use_confidentiality_documentation_responsibility

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The 14 guiding questions below will help you decide whether using GenAI is appropriate in a given instance. ... Are you allowed to use GenAI for the task? ... If data are confidential, will the GenAI tool keep it protected and secure? ... Are you documenting your GenAI use in sufficient enough detail so you can write honest and transparent disclosure statements?

Localized display only

The guide asks users to decide whether GenAI is appropriate by checking allowed use, confidential data protection, documentation for disclosure, procurement/data-protection guidance, and responsibility for outputs.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities