Policy presence
University of Bern has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Bern, Switzerland
University of Bern
University of Bern is listed as QS 2026 rank =184. University of Bern has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Bern is listed as QS 2026 rank =184. University of Bern has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Bern as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-bern.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Bern has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.
Exams
University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
University of Bern has 4 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
University of Bern has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Bern has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
University of Bern has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
University of Bern IT Services says organization units may procure AI services themselves, but for AI systems not listed on the Generative KIs page, personal data, official or professional-secret data, and especially sensitive personal or research data must not be entered; only information intended for the public or otherwise without legal protection requirements is allowed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unlisted_ai_systems_no_personal_official_secret_sensitive_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1Organisationseinheiten (OE) koennen KI Dienstleistungen eigenstaendig beschaffen. Fuer, auf dieser Seite nicht aufgefuehrte Systeme, gelten aber folgende Vorgaben: Es duerfen keine personenbezogenen Daten eingegeben werden. Es duerfen keine Amts- und/oder durch das Berufsgeheimnis geschuetzten Daten eingegeben werden. Es duerfen keine besonders schuetzenswerten Personen- und/oder Forschungsdaten eingegeben werden.
Localized display only
For AI systems not listed on the page, organization units may procure AI services themselves, but personal, official/professional-secret, and especially sensitive personal or research data may not be entered.
Academic Integrity
The University of Bern Institute of Art History AI teaching guidelines say student work and exams at the institute must remain students' own work and may not be replaced by AI-tool work; AI tools may support independent work, use must be marked with the tool, prompt, scope, and purpose, and incorrect logging, citation, and referencing of AI-tool use in written work is regarded as plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ikg_student_ai_use_independent_work_disclosure_plagiarism
Original evidence
Evidence 1Studentische Arbeiten und Pruefungen muessen eigenstaendige Leistungen der Studierenden sein. Diese duerfen nicht durch Arbeiten von KI-Tools ersetzt werden. ... Die Nutzung von KI-Tools muss gekennzeichnet werden. Hierbei muss ... angegeben werden, welches Tool, mit welchem Prompt, in welchem Umfang und zu welchem Zweck eingesetzt wurde.
Localized display only
Student work and exams must remain students' own work and may not be replaced by AI-tool work; AI-tool use must be marked with tool, prompt, scope, and purpose.
Security Review
University of Bern IT Services says that if an organization unit needs to enter and process covered data in AI systems, it must prepare an ISDS concept in advance and have it reviewed by the University of Bern CISO, legal service, and the Canton of Bern data protection supervisory authority; this also applies before processing official/professional-secret data or especially sensitive personal or research data in listed systems.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_system_sensitive_data_requires_isds_ciso_legal_data_protection_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1Sollte ein Bedarf zur Eingabe und Verarbeitung einer Teilmenge der oben genannten Daten bestehen, so ist durch die beschaffende Organisationseinheit vorgaengig ein ISDS Konzept zu erstellen und dieses durch den CISO und Rechtsdienst der Universitaet Bern, sowie die Datenschutzaufsichtsstelle des Kantons Bern zu pruefen.
Localized display only
If covered data need to be entered and processed, the procuring organization unit must prepare an ISDS concept in advance and have it reviewed by UniBE CISO, legal service, and the Canton of Bern data-protection authority.
Research
The University Library Bern GenAI step-by-step guide frames responsible GenAI use as a 14-question decision process that includes checking whether GenAI use is allowed for the task, whether confidential data are protected, whether use is documented for transparent disclosure, whether UniBE procurement and data-protection guidance has been read, and whether the user remains responsible for research output.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: library_genai_decision_guide_allowed_use_confidentiality_documentation_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 1The 14 guiding questions below will help you decide whether using GenAI is appropriate in a given instance. ... Are you allowed to use GenAI for the task? ... If data are confidential, will the GenAI tool keep it protected and secure? ... Are you documenting your GenAI use in sufficient enough detail so you can write honest and transparent disclosure statements?
Localized display only
The guide asks users to decide whether GenAI is appropriate by checking allowed use, confidential data protection, documentation for disclosure, procurement/data-protection guidance, and responsibility for outputs.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Generative KIs
unibe.ch
Leitlinien fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz in der Lehre
ikg.unibe.ch
Responsible use of GenAI: A Step-by-Step Guide
ub.unibe.ch
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.