Zürich, Switzerland Last checked

ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich)

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Subject to the applicable conditions

ETH Zurich advocates a proactive and responsible approach to generative AI in coursework. Students remain fully responsible for the content of any work they submit. Generative AI may serve a supplementary role (such as brainstorming, structuring, or coding assistance), but must never replace personal effort. Lecturers hold authority to determine whether and how generative AI may be used in their courses.

Official source ↗

Exams

Scope-specific restrictions

Performance assessments must be conducted independently and personally by the student. The use of unauthorized aids, including generative AI tools not permitted by the examiner, constitutes academic misconduct subject to disciplinary action under the ETH Zurich Ordinance on Disciplinary Measures.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Disclosure requirements and exceptions

ETH Zurich's declaration of originality provides two options: confirming that no generative AI was used, or confirming that authorised generative AI was used and its disclosure agreed with the supervisor. Bachelor's and Master's theses require a signed declaration of originality, while requirements for other written assessments depend on the applicable academic instructions. Doctoral candidates declare independent authorship through the doctoral examination registration process. The permitted use, disclosure format and any exceptions must follow the relevant supervisor and unit requirements. ETH Zurich's teaching guidelines instruct students to be transparent about their use of generative AI and to identify which tools contributed to which parts of their work, in accordance with applicable lecturer instructions and citation conventions. For scientific writing and theses, students should agree in advance with their supervisors on authorised AI use and disclosure requirements. ETH Library guidance recognises an exception where a supervisor has expressly agreed that particular AI use need not be separately declared. In the absence of such an agreement, undeclared use may constitute a breach of academic integrity.

Official source ↗

Privacy & sensitive data

Scope-specific restrictions

Uploading strictly confidential information to external cloud AI services is prohibited. Confidential information may only be processed in specifically evaluated configurations (such as M365 Copilot Work mode without web search). M365 Copilot Chat is approved for internal data. Google AI tools have not yet been assessed by the CISO (assessment OPEN) and are not released for ETH confidential, strictly confidential, or protected personal data. Copyright and privacy must be respected at all times.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Subject to the applicable conditions

ETH Zurich recommends Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM for teaching purposes. Base chat versions are included in institutional Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace subscriptions free of charge for students and employees, offering enterprise data protection where user data is not used for model training. Google tools have not yet completed CISO assessment (OPEN), so product availability does not constitute data classification approval. Tool availability does not equal assessment permission; instructors decide assessment permissions.

Official source ↗

Research & publication

Subject to the applicable conditions

Researchers and students are fully responsible for the integrity of their scientific work and must verify AI-generated output, references, and facts. Generative AI tools cannot be listed as authors or cited as authoritative sources. Theses require signed originality declarations; doctoral candidates declare independent authorship upon registration for the doctoral examination. Researchers must comply with applicable funder (e.g. SNSF) and publisher guidelines.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Scope-specific restrictions

ETH Library provides Turnitin Originality to eligible professors and lecturers for text-similarity checking, subject to data classification and responsible selective-use guidance. Only public or internal documents may be uploaded. Similarity screening is distinct from AI-authorship detection; ETH Zurich warns that technical detection of AI-generated output is unreliable and should not be treated as conclusive evidence. Violations of GenAI guidelines such as use of unauthorised aids or non-disclosure of their use are subject to disciplinary action under existing performance assessment rules and the declaration of originality.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Guidance, with task-specific requirements

Lecturers are encouraged to adapt teaching and assessment strategies to GenAI, discuss acceptable use with students, clearly communicate course permissions, and act as role models by making GenAI use visible in teaching materials and assessment workflows, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Scope-specific restrictions

ID CCR Cloud Service Center manages institutional cloud AI tools. Tools lacking cloud assessments (including third-party tools such as commercial ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Grok) are used on the user's own responsibility and must never process confidential, strictly confidential, or protected personal data. Institutional add-on software (such as Google AI Pro or M365 Copilot) requires employee license acquisition via the IT-Shop; specific fee and funding arrangements depend on applicable organizational procedures.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Agree the permitted use with the lecturer or supervisor.
    Site advice
  • Check the applicable originality declaration and disclosure agreement.
    Site advice
  • Verify AI-generated information, references and quotations.
    Requirement in this scope

Don’t

  • Do not let AI replace your own assessment work.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not put strictly confidential information in external cloud AI.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not treat similarity screening as reliable AI-authorship proof.
    Site advice

AI use questioned?

ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich)

Read each cited rule for its course, academic unit, activity and exceptions. Site advice does not create a university obligation.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

  • Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (Enterprise Data Protection)Institutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Sign in with ETH account (username@ethz.ch) via M365 subscription

  • Google Gemini Chat (Base Offering)Institutional access / licenceConditions apply

    ETH Google account via Google Workspace Cloud Subscription

  • Google NotebookLM (Workspace Subscription)Institutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Sign in with ETH Google account via Google Workspace Cloud Subscription

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record addition · Site correction

    Academic integrity · Teaching · 4 more topics · Records involved: 15 (11 corrected / adjusted · 4 added)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

15

Official sources

10 official URLs; 10 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

AI Tools & Licenses | ETH Zurich

ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

AI Tools & Licenses | ETH Zurich · 2026-10-12T06:11:27.987897Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

0a7517b303b91ff263accfe492e8941ddfda122b172c5f465392b2bebb5afb1d

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

ETH IT Services: Google Gemini & Google AI Pro for Education

unlimited.ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

ETH IT Services: Google Gemini & Google AI Pro for Education · 2026-10-12T06:11:38.470205Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

ecd7b331c95826fa240b55867a20b122de6b2b43bcbb61bbe9152a1e9e2422d9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

ETH IT Services: AI Tools at ETH Zurich & Security/Data Classification

unlimited.ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

ETH IT Services: AI Tools at ETH Zurich & Security/Data Classification · 2026-10-12T06:11:37.020618Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

36be2d664bee7d73dc98b2a88fe13b98ea4a029c161a67569491550deb6e402d

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

AI in Teaching and Learning — ETH Zurich

ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

AI in Teaching and Learning — ETH Zurich · 2026-10-12T06:11:25.974620Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

05e768573acf7a8f060bb9736d5648b54b290410bc6dcf16621d24d2959c970b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI in Teaching and Learning - Guidelines (December 2024)

ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

Generative AI in Teaching and Learning - Guidelines (December 2024) · 2026-10-12T06:11:24.710720Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

b883ba3727ad5e0f8af3d12a1846e3a6ecdab325e9ab95b75f80422463cc66ca

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

ETH Library: Plagiarism and Generative Artificial Intelligence

library.ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

ETH Library: Plagiarism and Generative Artificial Intelligence · 2026-10-12T06:11:33.023336Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

79bad72c13cb4c2710053173b3ed9ce7ca1211954827ca5aa11aed36446c3c02

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Academic Integrity — AI in Education

ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

Academic Integrity — AI in Education · 2026-10-12T06:11:26.636240Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

7cea3253df7b975f75dc10a21d31010df7046af69f82016d9ebd58656a8eeebc

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

ETH Zurich Declaration of Originality (Bachelor & Master)

ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

ETH Zurich Declaration of Originality (Bachelor & Master) · 2026-10-12T06:11:28.941491Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d3a3ed4457d6c6f5a7dea2d2e084ff201b1f63d8d56af61927e536cb5897f23a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

ETH Zurich Doctoral Examination Registration & Authorship Declaration

ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

ETH Zurich Doctoral Examination Registration & Authorship Declaration · 2026-10-12T06:11:31.841193Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

2fc181ae19d4630b43464d380b8aa66da7baf4df996ef3b20b3e2ee8db373937

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

ETH Library: Plagiarism Check & Turnitin Originality

library.ethz.ch

University official source

Hash and captured version

ETH Library: Plagiarism Check & Turnitin Originality · 2026-10-12T06:11:34.938479Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

fe42a443c6f65d498f8cd583c4947e8ca5354d1cf5a292e6fd721c9ecd20a0e3

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-audit-fix-20261014
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published scoped record correction; current JSON and MCP use the same reviewed record, while the previous baseline is retained in history. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Public student snapshot endpoint returns HTTP 404 (Not Found). Local 6-dimension candidate draft prepared in outputs/student-topics.json but not a published strong student snapshot.
  • Google AI tools (Gemini Chat, NotebookLM, Google AI Pro) have not completed CISO cloud assessment (status OPEN). Unassessed tools are not released for ETH confidential, strictly confidential, or protected personal data.
  • Turnitin Originality access is restricted to professors and lecturers, but fee structure (free/central vs departmental) is not stated on official page.
  • Disciplinary appeal stages, legal deadlines, and administrative court review procedures are governed by general Swiss administrative law and ETH regulations, but full statute texts were not crawled.
  • Explicit disability adjustment or assistive technology exceptions for generative AI are not detailed in current teaching guidelines.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        ETH Zurich advocates a proactive and responsible approach to generative AI in coursework. Students remain fully responsible for the content of any work they submit. Generative AI may serve a supplementary role (such as brainstorming, structuring, or coding assistance), but must never replace personal effort. Lecturers hold authority to determine whether and how generative AI may be used in their courses.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        ETH Zurich's declaration of originality provides two options: confirming that no generative AI was used, or confirming that authorised generative AI was used and its disclosure agreed with the supervisor. Bachelor's and Master's theses require a signed declaration of originality, while requirements for other written assessments depend on the applicable academic instructions. Doctoral candidates declare independent authorship through the doctoral examination registration process. The permitted use, disclosure format and any exceptions must follow the relevant supervisor and unit requirements. ETH Zurich's teaching guidelines instruct students to be transparent about their use of generative AI and to identify which tools contributed to which parts of their work, in accordance with applicable lecturer instructions and citation conventions. For scientific writing and theses, students should agree in advance with their supervisors on authorised AI use and disclosure requirements. ETH Library guidance recognises an exception where a supervisor has expressly agreed that particular AI use need not be separately declared. In the absence of such an agreement, undeclared use may constitute a breach of academic integrity.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Uploading strictly confidential information to external cloud AI services is prohibited. Confidential information may only be processed in specifically evaluated configurations (such as M365 Copilot Work mode without web search). M365 Copilot Chat is approved for internal data. Google AI tools have not yet been assessed by the CISO (assessment OPEN) and are not released for ETH confidential, strictly confidential, or protected personal data. Copyright and privacy must be respected at all times.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        ETH Zurich recommends Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM for teaching purposes. Base chat versions are included in institutional Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace subscriptions free of charge for students and employees, offering enterprise data protection where user data is not used for model training. Google tools have not yet completed CISO assessment (OPEN), so product availability does not constitute data classification approval. Tool availability does not equal assessment permission; instructors decide assessment permissions.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        Performance assessments must be conducted independently and personally by the student. The use of unauthorized aids, including generative AI tools not permitted by the examiner, constitutes academic misconduct subject to disciplinary action under the ETH Zurich Ordinance on Disciplinary Measures.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Researchers and students are fully responsible for the integrity of their scientific work and must verify AI-generated output, references, and facts. Generative AI tools cannot be listed as authors or cited as authoritative sources. Theses require signed originality declarations; doctoral candidates declare independent authorship upon registration for the doctoral examination. Researchers must comply with applicable funder (e.g. SNSF) and publisher guidelines.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        ETH Library provides Turnitin Originality to eligible professors and lecturers for text-similarity checking, subject to data classification and responsible selective-use guidance. Only public or internal documents may be uploaded. Similarity screening is distinct from AI-authorship detection; ETH Zurich warns that technical detection of AI-generated output is unreliable and should not be treated as conclusive evidence. Violations of GenAI guidelines such as use of unauthorised aids or non-disclosure of their use are subject to disciplinary action under existing performance assessment rules and the declaration of originality.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Lecturers are encouraged to adapt teaching and assessment strategies to GenAI, discuss acceptable use with students, clearly communicate course permissions, and act as role models by making GenAI use visible in teaching materials and assessment workflows, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        ID CCR Cloud Service Center manages institutional cloud AI tools. Tools lacking cloud assessments (including third-party tools such as commercial ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Grok) are used on the user's own responsibility and must never process confidential, strictly confidential, or protected personal data. Institutional add-on software (such as Google AI Pro or M365 Copilot) requires employee license acquisition via the IT-Shop; specific fee and funding arrangements depend on applicable organizational procedures.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        15 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →