Fribourg, Switzerland

Université de Fribourg

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3Source languagefrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universite-de-fribourg.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Privacy and data entry

Université de Fribourg has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

Université de Fribourg has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Université de Fribourg has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

Université de Fribourg has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Université de Fribourg has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence70%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records3

Adobe Firefly

Université de Fribourg

Tool
Adobe Firefly
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed

Github Copilot

Université de Fribourg

Tool
Github Copilot
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed

Microsoft Copilot Chat

Université de Fribourg

Tool
Microsoft Copilot Chat
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

UniFR's Data Protection Officers recommend not uploading sensitive data, named personal documents or data, confidential or secret materials, or documents whose exclusivity should be preserved into generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: do-not-upload-sensitive-personal-confidential-or-exclusive-data

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Recommandations de prudence de la part des Data Protection Officers (DPO) : Ne pas télécharger des données sensibles ... Ne pas donner des documents ou données contenant des noms de personnes ... Ne pas télécharger des documents ou données confidentiels ... ou couverts par un secret ... Ne pas télécharger des documents ou données dont on veut garder l'exclusivité.

Localized display only

DPO caution recommendations say not to upload sensitive data, named personal data, confidential/secret materials, or documents whose exclusivity should be kept.

Academic Integrity

When generative AI use is authorized in academic work, UniFR expects full transparency through a specific declaration and field-appropriate citation norms; undeclared use is treated as a violation of scientific integrity rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: authorized-use-requires-transparency-undeclared-use-integrity-violation

Original evidence

Evidence 1
En cas d'autorisation de l'IA générative ... Les étudiant-e-s doivent faire preuve d'une transparence totale quant à son utilisation, notamment via une déclaration spécifique en suivant les normes de citation de leur domaine ... L'utilisation non déclarée des IA génératives est une violation des règles de l’intégrité scientifique.

Localized display only

If generative AI is authorized, students must be fully transparent via a specific declaration and field citation norms; undeclared use violates scientific integrity rules.

Ai Tool Treatment

Université de Fribourg IT presents several AI services for its community, including Microsoft Copilot Chat, Adobe Firefly/Express, a local LLM implementation, Apertus, and GitHub Copilot Pro; Adobe Firefly is reserved for UniFR employees while Adobe Express is available to staff and students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: approved-or-presented-ai-services

Original evidence

Evidence 1
La DIT-ER vous propose : Microsoft Copilot Chat ... Génération d’images : Adobe Firefly / Adobe Express ... Implémentation locale d'un LLM ... Apertus ... Github Copilot Pro ... Adobe Firefly est réservé aux employé·es de l'UniFR.

Localized display only

UniFR IT lists Microsoft Copilot Chat, Adobe Firefly/Express, a local LLM, Apertus, and GitHub Copilot Pro; Adobe Firefly is reserved for employees.

Teaching

For generative AI in teaching, the Rectorate sets a common framework, while faculties, departments, centres and institutes define more precise conditions of use; rules for academic work and assessment are to be communicated to students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: central-framework-local-conditions-communicated-to-students

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Le Rectorat pose un cadre afin d’assurer des bases communes, mais il est du ressort des facultés, départements, centres et instituts, de définir de manière plus précise les conditions d’utilisation de l’IA générative. Des règles précises doivent réglementer l’emploi des IA génératives ... Elles sont communiquées aux étudiant-e-s.

Localized display only

The Rectorate sets common bases, while faculties and departments define precise conditions; rules must regulate use and be communicated to students.

Research

UniFR's research guidance states that researchers should approach generative AI use cautiously, verify AI-generated outputs, and adhere to relevant ethical considerations, regulations, and guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: researchers-responsible-for-cautious-verification-and-guideline-adherence

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Les chercheurs doivent s'assurer de l'exactitude et de la fiabilité du contenu généré par l'IA et rester conscients des considérations éthiques, des réglementations et des lignes directrices ... La responsabilité de vérifier les résultats de l'IA et d'adhérer aux normes pertinentes incombe en fin de compte aux chercheurs.

Localized display only

Researchers must ensure AI-generated content is accurate and reliable, stay aware of ethical/regulatory guidance, and are responsible for verifying AI outputs.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities