Policy presence
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Lausanne, Switzerland
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Never input confidential, private or personal information about yourself or others into these tools. Always reflect first on the nature of the information you are using, because once you enter it into one of these tools, it’s no longer confidential.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1EPFL rules (Lex 1.3.3, Article 4) require that all assessment material that is not the student’s personal and original contribution must be recognizable as such. Therefore, the use of AI tools should be disclosed in a statement.
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Since there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ rule regarding the use of AI in assessment, it is recommended that teachers make explicit to students what kind of use is not legitimate in their course, and what rules accompany the use of AI tools.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of AI-generated content in assignments without proper attribution is considered AI plagiarism. Tools that specifically aim to detect whether content was AI-generated (e.g., turnitin ) are not admissible as stand-alone evidence of AI plagiarism due to their high risk of false positives
Privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1However, enterprise licenses such as Microsoft 365 Copilot via your EPFL account are currently not a secure solution for processing regulated data, because no data processing agreement has been signed by EPFL that would guarantee that data protection measures align with institutional needs or with Swiss legislation on personal data protection.
0 machine or needs-review claim
6 source attribution
epfl.ch
epfl.ch
epfl.ch
epfl.ch
epfl.ch
epfl.ch