University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Lausanne, Switzerland

University of Lausanne

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =212UpdatedJul 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

7 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat Protégé is listed for University of Lausanne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat Protégé","description":"UNIL provides an institutional protected Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat version to its community under the CASA-EES contract.","howToObtain":"Go to Copilot Chat and sign in with UNIL credentials.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Le Centre informatique met à disposition de la communauté UNIL une version institutionnelle de Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat Protégé, activée dans le cadre du contrat CASA-EES. Connectez-vous avec vos identifiants UNIL.

Localized display only

Le Centre informatique met à disposition de la communauté UNIL une version institutionnelle de Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat Protégé, activée dans le cadre du contrat CASA-EES. Connectez-vous avec vos identifiants UNIL.

Source language
Français (fr)
Snapshot hash
f527d226…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026

Privacy

UNIL's AI FAQ says sensitive data under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot and requires specifically approved systems, such as local models, for such processing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: sensitive_data_not_in_copilot

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
By decision of the Rectorate, sensitive data as defined under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
f1b68e2b…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Important note under institutional Copilot guidance

Ai Tool Treatment

UNIL's AI FAQ says AI can be used at UNIL if data protection, individual responsibility, and academic integrity are upheld.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: permitted_with_conditions

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Can AI be used at UNIL? Yes, provided that data protection, individual responsibility and academic integrity are upheld at all times.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
f1b68e2b…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
FAQ section: Can AI be used at UNIL?

Ai Tool Treatment

UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat and to AI features in Wooclap and Wooflash, while warning that permitted teaching and research uses are governed by each faculty or school's guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: microsoft_365_copilot_chat_wooclap_wooflash

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (copilot.cloud.microsoft) as well as to the AI features available in Wooclap and Wooflash.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
f1b68e2b…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Data protection and confidentiality section

Academic Integrity

UNIL's education FAQ says current AI-detection quality is not sufficiently reliable to serve as the basis for restrictive policies or sanctions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: detectors_not_reliable_for_sanctions

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The fact that they are not sufficiently reliable means that they cannot be used as a basis for restrictive policies or the application of sanctions.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7f37d8d8…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Question: Is it possible to detect the use of ChatGPT or other text-generating AI tools in academic work?

Research

UNIL's research FAQ says authors should disclose generative-AI use in a statement near the end of a manuscript and should not list AI systems as authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: disclose_ai_use_no_ai_authorship

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI tools must not be listed as authors; their use should be disclosed in an appropriate statement but not credited as human co-authors.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
1228538a…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Question: Should AI-assisted tools be credited as authors on published work?

Teaching

UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: student_use_subject_to_teacher_limits

Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Students can, for example, use generative AI to: Initiate academic work ... within the limits of what their teacher prescribes in terms of the use or citation of generative AIs.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
7f37d8d8…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
For students section

Source record

Official sources

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Lausanne AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-lausanne

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log