Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Lausanne, Switzerland
University of Lausanne
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of Lausanne has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Lausanne has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Lausanne has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Lausanne has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Lausanne has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of Lausanne has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Lausanne has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Lausanne has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Lausanne has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UNIL's AI FAQ says sensitive data under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot and requires specifically approved systems, such as local models, for such processing.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: sensitive_data_not_in_copilot
Original evidence
Evidence 1By decision of the Rectorate, sensitive data as defined under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot.
Ai Tool Treatment
UNIL's AI FAQ says AI can be used at UNIL if data protection, individual responsibility, and academic integrity are upheld.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: permitted_with_conditions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Can AI be used at UNIL? Yes, provided that data protection, individual responsibility and academic integrity are upheld at all times.
Ai Tool Treatment
UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat and to AI features in Wooclap and Wooflash, while warning that permitted teaching and research uses are governed by each faculty or school's guidelines.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: microsoft_365_copilot_chat_wooclap_wooflash
Original evidence
Evidence 1UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (copilot.cloud.microsoft) as well as to the AI features available in Wooclap and Wooflash.
Academic Integrity
UNIL's education FAQ says current AI-detection quality is not sufficiently reliable to serve as the basis for restrictive policies or sanctions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: detectors_not_reliable_for_sanctions
Original evidence
Evidence 1The fact that they are not sufficiently reliable means that they cannot be used as a basis for restrictive policies or the application of sanctions.
Research
UNIL's research FAQ says authors should disclose generative-AI use in a statement near the end of a manuscript and should not list AI systems as authors.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: disclose_ai_use_no_ai_authorship
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools must not be listed as authors; their use should be disclosed in an appropriate statement but not credited as human co-authors.
Teaching
UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_use_subject_to_teacher_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students can, for example, use generative AI to: Initiate academic work ... within the limits of what their teacher prescribes in terms of the use or citation of generative AIs.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
FAQ: AI in Education
unil.ch
FAQ: AI in Research
unil.ch
FAQ: Using AI at UNIL
unil.ch