Change log

University of Lausanne

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Lausanne currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Lausanne current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # University of Lausanne AI policy record
2+privacy: UNIL's AI FAQ says sensitive data under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot and requires specifically approved systems, such as local models, for such processing.
3+Evidence (en, f1b68e2b293c): By decision of the Rectorate, sensitive data as defined under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot.
4+ai_tool_treatment: UNIL's AI FAQ says AI can be used at UNIL if data protection, individual responsibility, and academic integrity are upheld.
5+Evidence (en, f1b68e2b293c): Can AI be used at UNIL? Yes, provided that data protection, individual responsibility and academic integrity are upheld at all times.
6+ai_tool_treatment: UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat and to AI features in Wooclap and Wooflash, while warning that permitted teaching and research uses are governed by each faculty or school's guidelines.
7+Evidence (en, f1b68e2b293c): UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (copilot.cloud.microsoft) as well as to the AI features available in Wooclap and Wooflash.
8+academic_integrity: UNIL's education FAQ says current AI-detection quality is not sufficiently reliable to serve as the basis for restrictive policies or sanctions.
9+Evidence (en, 7f37d8d893b7): The fact that they are not sufficiently reliable means that they cannot be used as a basis for restrictive policies or the application of sanctions.
10+research: UNIL's research FAQ says authors should disclose generative-AI use in a statement near the end of a manuscript and should not list AI systems as authors.
11+Evidence (en, 1228538a0ed9): AI tools must not be listed as authors; their use should be disclosed in an appropriate statement but not credited as human co-authors.
12+teaching: UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.
13+Evidence (en, 7f37d8d893b7): Students can, for example, use generative AI to: Initiate academic work ... within the limits of what their teacher prescribes in terms of the use or citation of generative AIs.

Claim changes

6 claim records

privacy

UNIL's AI FAQ says sensitive data under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot and requires specifically approved systems, such as local models, for such processing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UNIL's AI FAQ says AI can be used at UNIL if data protection, individual responsibility, and academic integrity are upheld.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat and to AI features in Wooclap and Wooflash, while warning that permitted teaching and research uses are governed by each faculty or school's guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UNIL's education FAQ says current AI-detection quality is not sufficiently reliable to serve as the basis for restrictive policies or sanctions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UNIL's research FAQ says authors should disclose generative-AI use in a statement near the end of a manuscript and should not list AI systems as authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions