Change log

University of Lausanne

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Lausanne currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Lausanne. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Lausanne combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # University of Lausanne AI policy record
2+privacy: UNIL's AI FAQ says sensitive data under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot and requires specifically approved systems, such as local models, for such processing.
3+Evidence (en, f1b68e2b293c): By decision of the Rectorate, sensitive data as defined under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot.
4+ai_tool_treatment: UNIL's AI FAQ says AI can be used at UNIL if data protection, individual responsibility, and academic integrity are upheld.
5+Evidence (en, f1b68e2b293c): Can AI be used at UNIL? Yes, provided that data protection, individual responsibility and academic integrity are upheld at all times.
6+ai_tool_treatment: UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat and to AI features in Wooclap and Wooflash, while warning that permitted teaching and research uses are governed by each faculty or school's guidelines.
7+Evidence (en, f1b68e2b293c): UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (copilot.cloud.microsoft) as well as to the AI features available in Wooclap and Wooflash.
8+academic_integrity: UNIL's education FAQ says current AI-detection quality is not sufficiently reliable to serve as the basis for restrictive policies or sanctions.
9+Evidence (en, 7f37d8d893b7): The fact that they are not sufficiently reliable means that they cannot be used as a basis for restrictive policies or the application of sanctions.
10+research: UNIL's research FAQ says authors should disclose generative-AI use in a statement near the end of a manuscript and should not list AI systems as authors.
11+Evidence (en, 1228538a0ed9): AI tools must not be listed as authors; their use should be disclosed in an appropriate statement but not credited as human co-authors.
12+teaching: UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.
13+Evidence (en, 7f37d8d893b7): Students can, for example, use generative AI to: Initiate academic work ... within the limits of what their teacher prescribes in terms of the use or citation of generative AIs.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

privacy

UNIL's AI FAQ says sensitive data under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot and requires specifically approved systems, such as local models, for such processing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UNIL's AI FAQ says AI can be used at UNIL if data protection, individual responsibility, and academic integrity are upheld.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat and to AI features in Wooclap and Wooflash, while warning that permitted teaching and research uses are governed by each faculty or school's guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UNIL's education FAQ says current AI-detection quality is not sufficiently reliable to serve as the basis for restrictive policies or sanctions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UNIL's research FAQ says authors should disclose generative-AI use in a statement near the end of a manuscript and should not list AI systems as authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions