Change log

University of Lausanne

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Lausanne currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

6 claim records

privacy

UNIL's AI FAQ says sensitive data under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot and requires specifically approved systems, such as local models, for such processing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UNIL's AI FAQ says AI can be used at UNIL if data protection, individual responsibility, and academic integrity are upheld.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat and to AI features in Wooclap and Wooflash, while warning that permitted teaching and research uses are governed by each faculty or school's guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UNIL's education FAQ says current AI-detection quality is not sufficiently reliable to serve as the basis for restrictive policies or sanctions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UNIL's research FAQ says authors should disclose generative-AI use in a statement near the end of a manuscript and should not list AI systems as authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions