Policy presence
The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Gyeonggi, South Korea
The Catholic University of Korea (CUK)
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Exams
The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Unverified, undisclosed, or unattributed generative AI use can be research misconduct in thesis review
Original evidence
Evidence 1다음과 같은 경우 표절, 위조, 변조 등의 연구부정행위로 간주되어 학위논문 심사 불합격 등의 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다: 생성형 AI가 제공한 정보를 출처 확인 없이 그대로 사용하는 경우; AI 도구를 사용했으나 활용 사실을 은폐하거나, 논문에 명시하지 않은 경우; AI가 생성한 텍스트나 자료를 본인 창작물인 것처럼 명시 없이 사용하는 경우
Localized display only
The FAQ warns that using AI-provided information without source checking, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own may be treated as research misconduct with thesis-review consequences.
Academic Integrity
For General Graduate School thesis work, CUK says generative AI use should occur after prior consultation with and under guidance from the student's advisor.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Prior advisor consultation and guidance expected for generative AI in thesis work
Original evidence
Evidence 1반드시 본인의 지도교수님과의 사전 상의 및 지도하에 생성형 AI를 활용하시기 바랍니다.
Localized display only
The FAQ says students should use generative AI only after prior consultation with and under guidance from their advisor.
Research
CUK's General Graduate School says its AI use guideline applies as the basic standard for AI use during degree-thesis writing.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: General Graduate School degree-thesis AI use guideline applies as basic standard
Original evidence
Evidence 1본 가이드라인은 일반대학원 학위논문 작성 과정에서의 AI 활용에 대한 기본 기준으로 적용됩니다.
Localized display only
This guideline applies as the basic standard for AI use in the General Graduate School degree-thesis writing process.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
「가톨릭대학교 일반대학원생을 위한 AI 활용 가이드라인」 안내 | 가톨릭대학교 일반대학원
gs.catholic.ac.kr
FAQ 게시판목록 - 가톨릭대학교 일반대학원
gs.catholic.ac.kr