University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

The Catholic University of Korea (CUK)

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Claims3Sources2
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+6-0
11 # The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.
3+Evidence (ko, 75a101aeabde): 다음과 같은 경우 표절, 위조, 변조 등의 연구부정행위로 간주되어 학위논문 심사 불합격 등의 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다: 생성형 AI가 제공한 정보를 출처 확인 없이 그대로 사용하는 경우; AI 도구를 사용했으나 활용 사실을 은폐하거나, 논문에 명시하지 않은 경우; AI가 생성한 텍스트나 자료를 본인 창작물인 것처럼 명시 없이 사용하는 경우
4+academic_integrity: For General Graduate School thesis work, CUK says generative AI use should occur after prior consultation with and under guidance from the student's advisor.
5+Evidence (ko, 75a101aeabde): 반드시 본인의 지도교수님과의 사전 상의 및 지도하에 생성형 AI를 활용하시기 바랍니다.
6+research: CUK's General Graduate School says its AI use guideline applies as the basic standard for AI use during degree-thesis writing.
7+Evidence (ko, bf97fbe02118): 본 가이드라인은 일반대학원 학위논문 작성 과정에서의 AI 활용에 대한 기본 기준으로 적용됩니다.

Claim changes

3 claim records

academic_integrity

CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesko

academic_integrity

For General Graduate School thesis work, CUK says generative AI use should occur after prior consultation with and under guidance from the student's advisor.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesko

research

CUK's General Graduate School says its AI use guideline applies as the basic standard for AI use during degree-thesis writing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesko

Source snapshots

2 source attributions

FAQ 게시판목록 - 가톨릭대학교 일반대학원

official_guidance checked May 18, 2026

Snapshot hash
75a101aeabded79e123d649f04dd89e2749d208c88a2fe6dda451c708661aeee