Policy presence
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Gwangju, South Korea
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) has 4 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
GIST's research misconduct reporting page lists reportable targets including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, improper authorship, duplicate publication, investigation obstruction, serious departures from accepted academic norms, and coercing or proposing misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_misconduct_reporting_categories
Original evidence
Evidence 1연구부정행위 신고대상 ‘위조’, ‘변조’, ‘표절’, ‘부당한 논문저자 표시’, ‘부당한 중복게재’, ‘연구부정 행위에 대한 조사 방해 행위’, 각 학문 분야에서 통상적으로 용인되는 범위를 심각하게 벗어난 행위, 타인에게 부정행위를 행할 것을 제안·강요·협박하는 행위
Localized display only
The page lists research misconduct reporting targets including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, improper authorship, duplicate publication, investigation obstruction, serious departures from accepted norms, and proposing or coercing misconduct.
Privacy
For the NRF-scoped guidance relayed by GIST, the listed recommendations include not uploading evaluation materials to AI tools, indicating AI tool use, verifying reliability and validity, and caution about research-data leakage.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: nrf_genai_confidentiality_disclosure_validation_security_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1○ 권고 내용 - (비밀유지) AI 도구에 평가자료 업로드 금지 - (정보공개) AI 도구 사용 내역 표기 권장 ※ 사용 시 표기 방식(예시) 마련 - (검증책임) AI 도구 사용 시 자료의 신뢰성, 타당성 확보를 위한 검증 책임 명시 - (보안책임) AI 도구에 연구자료 업로드 시 정보 유출 주의, 유출 시 연구자 책임 명시
Localized display only
The listed recommendations cover confidentiality, AI-use disclosure, validation responsibility, and security responsibility for research-data leakage.
Research
GIST's Research Office notice relays NRF guidance for NRF project applicants, performers, and evaluators to use generative AI tools ethically and responsibly in related work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: nrf_project_participants_responsible_genai_use_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1한국연구재단에서 재단 과제의 신청·수행 및 평가 업무에 참여하는 연구자가 생성형 인공지능(AI) 도구를 "윤리적이고 책임있게" 사용하도록 『생성형 인공지능(AI) 도구의 책임 있는 사용을 위한 권고사항』 (개정판)을 마련하여 붙임과 같이 배포하오니 관련 업무시 활용하여 주시기 바랍니다.
Localized display only
The notice says NRF prepared revised recommendations so researchers participating in NRF application, performance, and evaluation work use generative AI tools ethically and responsibly, and asks users to apply them to related work.
Academic Integrity
GIST's undergraduate academic handbook lists academic and research-related disciplinary categories including exam-score manipulation or question leakage, cheating during exams, class disruption, academic warning, and research ethics violations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: undergraduate_handbook_academic_research_discipline_categories
Original evidence
Evidence 12. 학업/연구 관련 가. 시험성적 조작 및 문제 유출 나. 시험 중 부정행위 다. 수업방해 라. 학사경고 마. 연구윤리 위반
Localized display only
The handbook's academic/research discipline section lists score manipulation or exam-question leakage, cheating during exams, class disruption, academic warning, and research ethics violations.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
[한국연구재단] 생성형 인공지능(AI) 도구의 책임 있는 사용을 위한 권고사항 안내
ipa.gist.ac.kr
GIST 대학 학사편람
ewww.gist.ac.kr
연구부정행위 신고
gist.ac.kr