Gwangju, South Korea

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

4 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

GIST's research misconduct reporting page lists reportable targets including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, improper authorship, duplicate publication, investigation obstruction, serious departures from accepted academic norms, and coercing or proposing misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: research_misconduct_reporting_categories

Original evidence

Evidence 1
연구부정행위 신고대상 ‘위조’, ‘변조’, ‘표절’, ‘부당한 논문저자 표시’, ‘부당한 중복게재’, ‘연구부정 행위에 대한 조사 방해 행위’, 각 학문 분야에서 통상적으로 용인되는 범위를 심각하게 벗어난 행위, 타인에게 부정행위를 행할 것을 제안·강요·협박하는 행위

Localized display only

The page lists research misconduct reporting targets including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, improper authorship, duplicate publication, investigation obstruction, serious departures from accepted norms, and proposing or coercing misconduct.

Privacy

For the NRF-scoped guidance relayed by GIST, the listed recommendations include not uploading evaluation materials to AI tools, indicating AI tool use, verifying reliability and validity, and caution about research-data leakage.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: nrf_genai_confidentiality_disclosure_validation_security_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
○ 권고 내용 - (비밀유지) AI 도구에 평가자료 업로드 금지 - (정보공개) AI 도구 사용 내역 표기 권장 ※ 사용 시 표기 방식(예시) 마련 - (검증책임) AI 도구 사용 시 자료의 신뢰성, 타당성 확보를 위한 검증 책임 명시 - (보안책임) AI 도구에 연구자료 업로드 시 정보 유출 주의, 유출 시 연구자 책임 명시

Localized display only

The listed recommendations cover confidentiality, AI-use disclosure, validation responsibility, and security responsibility for research-data leakage.

Research

GIST's Research Office notice relays NRF guidance for NRF project applicants, performers, and evaluators to use generative AI tools ethically and responsibly in related work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: nrf_project_participants_responsible_genai_use_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
한국연구재단에서 재단 과제의 신청·수행 및 평가 업무에 참여하는 연구자가 생성형 인공지능(AI) 도구를 "윤리적이고 책임있게" 사용하도록 『생성형 인공지능(AI) 도구의 책임 있는 사용을 위한 권고사항』 (개정판)을 마련하여 붙임과 같이 배포하오니 관련 업무시 활용하여 주시기 바랍니다.

Localized display only

The notice says NRF prepared revised recommendations so researchers participating in NRF application, performance, and evaluation work use generative AI tools ethically and responsibly, and asks users to apply them to related work.

Academic Integrity

GIST's undergraduate academic handbook lists academic and research-related disciplinary categories including exam-score manipulation or question leakage, cheating during exams, class disruption, academic warning, and research ethics violations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%

Normalized value: undergraduate_handbook_academic_research_discipline_categories

Original evidence

Evidence 1
2. 학업/연구 관련 가. 시험성적 조작 및 문제 유출 나. 시험 중 부정행위 다. 수업방해 라. 학사경고 마. 연구윤리 위반

Localized display only

The handbook's academic/research discipline section lists score manipulation or exam-question leakage, cheating during exams, class disruption, academic warning, and research ethics violations.

Source record

Official sources

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence86%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/gwangju-institute-of-science-and-technology-gist

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log