Busan, South Korea

Pusan National University

Pusan National University is listed as QS 2026 rank =473. Pusan National University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Pusan National University is listed as QS 2026 rank =473. Pusan National University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Pusan National University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/pusan-national-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage6 reviewedSource languagekoPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/pusan-national-university.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

Pusan National University's AI ethics charter/guidelines state that students may use AI as a supplemental learning or research aid, but should not undermine academic integrity and should disclose the source and scope when using generative AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: Students may use AI as a support tool, with disclosure and academic-integrity limits.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
학생 AI를 학습·연구에 보조적으로 활용하되, 학업 성실성을 훼손하지 않는다. 생성형 AI 사용 시 출처, 활용 범위를 명시한다.

Localized display only

Students should use AI as a learning/research aid without harming academic integrity, and state source and scope when using generative AI.

Teaching

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline tells instructors to clearly announce in the syllabus or early in the course whether AI tools may be used, the permitted scope, and evaluation criteria.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Instructors are directed to specify AI-use permission, scope, and evaluation criteria at course start or in the syllabus.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
학습 목표와 수업 운영 방침에 기반하여 AI 활용 허용범위 및 허용 사항을 결정하고, 교수계획표에 명시함 수업에서 AI 도구 활용 여부, 허용 범위, 평가 기준을 학기 초에 명확히 공지한다.

Localized display only

Instructors decide the permitted scope of AI use based on course goals and policy, list it in the syllabus, and announce AI tool use, allowed scope, and evaluation criteria early in the term.

Academic Integrity

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline says instructors should communicate permitted or prohibited AI use for assessments, and it warns against deciding a student's grade solely from an AI plagiarism or AI-detection tool result.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: Assessment guidance requires AI-use criteria and rejects AI-detection results as a sole grading basis.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
평가 시 AI 사용에 대한 구체적인 허용범위(출처 표기, 부정행위 기준 등)을 안내함 금지 사항 평가에서 AI 사용에 대한 허용/금지 기준을 공지하지 않음 AI 탐지 도구의 결과만으로 학생의 성적을 결정함

Localized display only

The guideline says to explain permitted AI use in assessment, including citation and misconduct standards, and lists deciding a student's grade only from an AI detection tool as prohibited.

Academic Integrity

Pusan National University's student AI utilization guideline tells students to first check and follow the instructor's AI-use instructions for exams and assignments, and to identify the tool, purpose, and scope when AI use is allowed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: Students must follow instructor AI-use rules for exams and assignments and disclose tool, purpose, and scope when allowed.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
시험이나 과제물에 대해 교수자의 AI 관련 지침을 우선 확인하고, 교수자의 사용인정 범위를 따른 AI 활용이 허용되어 있는 경우, 활용한 AI 도구명, 사용 목적, 활용 범위를 밝힘

Localized display only

For exams and assignments, students should first check the instructor's AI instructions, follow the permitted scope, and disclose the AI tool, purpose, and scope when AI use is allowed.

Ai Tool Treatment

Pusan National University's AX and Information Innovation headquarters provides Sanjini AI, a free PNU-customized AI agent service integrating generative AI agents and campus information agents, for faculty, staff, students, and general users.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: PNU provides Sanjini AI as a free AI agent service; generative AI agent access is listed for faculty/staff and students.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AX·정보화혁신본부에서는 교내 구성원이 교육·행정·연구 업무를 보다 효율적으로 수행할 수 있도록 다양한 생성형 AI에이전트와 교내 주요 정보 안내 AI 에이전트를 하나로 통합한 부산대학교 특화 AI 에이전트 서비스 「산지니 AI」(무료 생성형 AI)를 제공하고 있습니다. 이용대상: 교직원(재직·휴직), 학생(재학·휴학), 일반사용자

Localized display only

PNU provides Sanjini AI, a free PNU-customized AI agent service integrating generative AI and campus information agents, with eligible users including faculty/staff, students, and general users.

Research

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline says AI-generated text or materials used in research plans or reports should be disclosed in footnotes or references, and states that AI is recognized only as a tool rather than as a coauthor.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: Research reporting should disclose AI tool use; AI may be acknowledged as a tool but not listed as an author.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
연구개발계획서 및 중간(단계) · 최종(결과)보고서 작성 시 AI 도구로 생성한 문장 및 자료 등을 사용할 경우, 각주 또는 참고문헌(References) 파트에 AI 도구 활용 내역 표기 AI는 '도구'로만 인정되며, Acknowledgements나 Methods 섹션에서만 언급 가능

Localized display only

When AI-generated text or materials are used in research plans or reports, the AI tool use should be noted in footnotes or references; AI is recognized only as a tool and may be mentioned only in acknowledgements or methods.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

부산대학교 AI 윤리헌장 및 윤리 가이드라인 / 부산대학교 AI 활용 가이드라인

ctl.pusan.ac.kr

Snapshot hash
99a230ee2ad4661316fc75cff21005f324f60f6283af49366153aced186844ba

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities