Evanston, United States Last checked

Northwestern University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional

Follow the actual course and assignment instructions. Open, Conditional and Closed are instructor examples, not blanket student permission. Feinberg MD assignments require direct authorship unless specifically permitted; the Kellogg 2025–26 rule is historical.

Official source ↗

Exams

Unclear

Unauthorized examination aids are prohibited. The reviewed current university guidance does not establish one AI default for every exam; follow the instructor and school rules. The Kellogg 2025–26 manual must not be assumed current.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required

Work submitted under your name needs proper attribution and authorization. Follow the task’s disclosure format; detailed prompt/verification lists in teaching examples are not a universal checklist, and citation does not authorize prohibited use.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Restricted

Use only the validated tool, intended use and applicable data-provider permission. Feinberg clinical PHI guidance, its MD policy, McCormick Level 3 ban and Pritzker’s some-Level-3 allowance have distinct scopes. No-training assurances do not remove sensitive-data or retention limits.

Official source ↗

Tools and access

Conditional

Copilot Chat is available through Northwestern accounts; paid M365 Copilot and school-funded ChatGPT/Claude seats have different eligibility. The SSO tool catalog remains unverified, and access never grants assessment permission.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Restricted

Panopto should not be used for non-public research data in the interview-transcription guidance. Other research recording, IRB and sponsor conditions require separate checks; Feinberg MD publication/presentation disclosure follows journal or organization requirements.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Restricted

Unauthorized AI authorship may be cheating or plagiarism. Part C response, possible sanctions and appeals apply only to listed schools; professional schools differ. TGS’s written-decision appeal period and initial-notification finality wording must remain separate.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Recommended

Instructors can choose and communicate AI course policies; the Open/Conditional/Closed examples and Fall 2026 smart-glasses wording are recommendations. AI grading involving protected student information needs the stated agreements and security review.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Restricted

Institutional data use requires the intended-use validation and data-provider permission in IT guidance. Protected grading data and school workspaces have additional agreements/restrictions; a catalog listing or no-training statement does not itself approve a use case.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check each course syllabus and assignment guidelines for generative AI rules, and ask instructors when permissions are unclear.
    Source guidance
  • Provide proper attribution and follow instructor disclosure rules whenever AI assistance is permitted in your academic work.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Log in with your Northwestern account to access approved general tools like Copilot Chat, and verify institutional data protections before use.
    Site advice

Don’t

  • Do not submit AI-generated work as your own without authorization or proper attribution, and do not use unauthorized aids during examinations.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Northwestern IT advises not entering institutional data into AI tools unless validated for that intended use and data-provider permission is granted; separately, Kellogg’s advice that confidential student info or regulated research data should not be entered remains and is not overridden by protected workspaces or no-training assurances.
    Source guidance
  • Do not assume that university access to an AI tool grants permission to use it for coursework, assignments, or exams.
    Site advice

AI use questioned?

Northwestern University

University academic integrity standards and IT data guidelines apply campus-wide; course, school, and clinical environments maintain specific policies.

Investigation & response

In Part C schools, students receive notice, an opportunity to respond and a written decision; ordinarily the initial meeting is within seven business days of receiving written notice. Reports are due within one month after the reporting person learns of the alleged incident.

Original evidence and scope

In Part C schools, students receive notice, an opportunity to respond and a written decision; ordinarily the initial meeting is within seven business days of receiving written notice. Reports are due within one month after the reporting person learns of the alleged incident.

nw-local-partc-response
Parts A and B (The Basic Standards of Academic Integrity and the Eight Cardinal Rules of Academic Integrity) describe the principles of student academic conduct supported by all academic programs at the University, at every level—both undergraduate and graduate—and regardless of modality or venue, including, but not limited to, online courses and study abroad programs. Part C describes the Procedures, Student Rights, Sanctions and External Reporting Policy that will govern academic integrity issues arising in classes within the Bienen School of Music, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications, Northwestern Uni

Captured source text; Preamble (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 426–428; characters 17645–18882; excerpt offset 0–700

Official university source ↗
versity in Qatar, School of Communication, School of Education and Social Policy, School of Professional Studies, The Graduate School, and Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. The professional schools—Kellogg School of Management, Feinberg School of Medicine, and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law—have developed their own sets of procedures, protections, sanctions and reporting standards consistent with the professional obligations and ethical expectations of their fields. More information about their policies can be found here.

Captured source text; Preamble (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 426–428; characters 17645–18882; excerpt offset 700–1237

Official university source ↗
Reasonable time, if requested, within which to prepare a response to the charge. Ordinarily, an initial meeting with the relevant school administrator will take place within 7 business days of receiving written notice of the charge.

Captured source text; C. Student Rights item 3 (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 479–479; characters 27466–27698; excerpt offset 0–232

Official university source ↗
Suspected cases of academic integrity violations should be reported to the course instructor or the relevant administrator of the school in which the course or program is based. Reports must be brought within 1 month of the date the reporting individual becomes aware of the alleged incident. The relevant administrator of the school will review the report and decide whether to bring a charge. Students charged with an academic integrity violation may not change their registration or grading basis in a course in which the charge is pending, or in which a finding of an academic integrity violation has been made. 

Captured source text; C. Procedures (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 474–474; characters 25937–26553; excerpt offset 0–616

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

Part C sanctions are imposed by the enrollment school, jointly for dual-degree students, and may include warning, suspension, award restrictions, degree revocation or expulsion. First offenses do not guarantee a warning. External reporting restrictions have stated exceptions.

Original evidence and scope

Part C sanctions are imposed by the enrollment school, jointly for dual-degree students, and may include warning, suspension, award restrictions, degree revocation or expulsion. First offenses do not guarantee a warning. External reporting restrictions have stated exceptions.

nw-local-partc-outcomes
Parts A and B (The Basic Standards of Academic Integrity and the Eight Cardinal Rules of Academic Integrity) describe the principles of student academic conduct supported by all academic programs at the University, at every level—both undergraduate and graduate—and regardless of modality or venue, including, but not limited to, online courses and study abroad programs. Part C describes the Procedures, Student Rights, Sanctions and External Reporting Policy that will govern academic integrity issues arising in classes within the Bienen School of Music, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications, Northwestern Uni

Captured source text; Preamble (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 426–428; characters 17645–18882; excerpt offset 0–700

Official university source ↗
versity in Qatar, School of Communication, School of Education and Social Policy, School of Professional Studies, The Graduate School, and Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. The professional schools—Kellogg School of Management, Feinberg School of Medicine, and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law—have developed their own sets of procedures, protections, sanctions and reporting standards consistent with the professional obligations and ethical expectations of their fields. More information about their policies can be found here.

Captured source text; Preamble (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 426–428; characters 17645–18882; excerpt offset 700–1237

Official university source ↗
All proven cases of an academic integrity violation should be penalized as appropriate under the circumstances. Sanctions will be imposed by the school in which the student is enrolled. (Note: For dual degree students, sanctions will be jointly decided by the relevant administrators in the applicable schools.) The imposition of any sanction other than a reprimand or warning should include a statement of reasons supporting its severity. Sanctions may include but are not limited to: A letter of reprimand and warning. A defined period of suspension of one or more quarters. Ineligibility for certain awards, honors and special programs. Revocation of an awarded degree. Expulsion from the Universi

Captured source text; C. Sanctions (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 488–495; characters 29598–30608; excerpt offset 0–700

Official university source ↗
ty (noted on official transcript). Any appropriate combination of the above. It should be understood that there is no necessary connection between a first-time offense and a letter of reprimand. Depending on the nature of the offense, a student may be suspended or expelled as a result of a first-time offense.

Captured source text; C. Sanctions (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 488–495; characters 29598–30608; excerpt offset 700–1010

Official university source ↗
Sanctions that do not result in separation from the University (suspension or expulsion) are not reported to external entities by Northwestern University unless: 1) the student consents to the disclosure; or 2) disclosure is required by law.

Captured source text; C. External Reporting Policy (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 498–498; characters 31166–31407; excerpt offset 0–241

Official university source ↗

Review & appeal

Provost Part C provides a written school appeal within ten business days and possible Provost review; the general provisions do not specify the counting start events.

Original evidence and scope

Provost Part C provides a written school appeal within ten business days and possible Provost review; the general provisions do not specify the counting start events.

nw-new-20261022-02
Review of any adverse initial determination (finding, sanction, or both), if requested in writing by the student within 10 business days, by a school-level appeals committee. The appeals committee must conduct a thorough review of the evidence in the case as well as the process followed. The appeals committee may not be made up entirely of the same individuals who decided the initial violation. Implementation of sanctions will generally be suspended until all appeals made by the student have been exhausted.

Captured source text; C. Student Rights item 6 (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 482–482; characters 28215–28727; excerpt offset 0–512

Official university source ↗
Review of any adverse initial determination (finding, sanction, or both), if requested in writing by the student within 10 business days, by a school-level appeals committee. The appeals committee must conduct a thorough review of the evidence in the case as well as the process followed. The appeals committee may not be made up entirely of the same individuals who decided the initial violation. Implementation of sanctions will generally be suspended until all appeals made by the student have been exhausted. Final review of an unsuccessful appeal if requested in writing by the student within 10 business days, by the Provost or an advisory committee designated by the Provost. The Provost will

Captured source text; C. Student Rights items 6–7 (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 482–486; characters 28215–29586; excerpt offset 0–700

Official university source ↗
review unsuccessful appeals only after a finding and a sanction have been issued. The Office of the Provost limits reviews to: New information discovered after resolution of the case that could not have reasonably been available at the time of the resolution of the case and is of a nature that could materially change the outcome.  Procedural errors within the academic integrity process that may have substantially affected the fairness of the proceeding. An outcome (findings and/or sanction) that was manifestly contrary to the weight of the information presented during the proceeding; i.e., obviously unreasonable and unsupported by the great weight of information.

Captured source text; C. Student Rights items 6–7 (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 5ccc4cc7c8931349a42a3798f03309c0b0ad2c8cced79f692765bbc1325464be; original binding lines 482–486; characters 28215–29586; excerpt offset 700–1371

Official university source ↗

For TGS school-level appeals, the ten-business-day period is expressed from the Associate Dean written decision in IV.A, while IV.D separately uses initial notification for finality.

Original evidence and scope

For TGS school-level appeals, the ten-business-day period is expressed from the Associate Dean written decision in IV.A, while IV.D separately uses initial notification for finality.

nw-new-20261022-03
A. The Associate Dean’s finding of violation and/or school-level sanctions imposed as a result of the violation may be appealed to an ad hoc faculty committee by the student filing a written notice of appeal within 10 business days of the Associate Dean’s written statement of decision. Grades modified by the course instructor following a finding of violation may not be appealed.  

Captured source text; TGS IV.A (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 d5d2caeee2f9366f027f95765a3bbb4253bb03291c21caf30990aa668cd4aee6; original binding lines 2236–2236; characters 45236–45619; excerpt offset 0–383

Official university source ↗
D. Appeals to The Graduate School will be reviewed by an ad hoc faculty committee with whom the student may meet, if requested. The intent of The Graduate School’s appeals process may be to reassess whether academic misconduct occurred and/or whether the sanction was commensurate with the finding. Generally, implementation of sanctions will be suspended until all appeals made by the student have been exhausted. If no appeal is filed within 10 business days of the initial notification, the decision shall become final and will be implemented at the conclusion of the appeal period.

Captured source text; TGS IV.D (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 d5d2caeee2f9366f027f95765a3bbb4253bb03291c21caf30990aa668cd4aee6; original binding lines 2239–2239; characters 46245–46830; excerpt offset 0–585

Official university source ↗

AI tools & access

  • ChatGPT Business — McCormickInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Eligible McCormick faculty/staff use the school process; additional lab/student licenses require faculty-funded requests.

  • Claude Enterprise — McCormickInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Use the McCormick institutional request process for eligible funded or separately paid seats.

  • Claude Team — KelloggInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Use Kellogg’s subscription process and credentials; exact eligibility/allocations depend on role.

  • Microsoft Copilot ChatInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Sign in using Northwestern credentials to the institutional Copilot Chat environment.

  • Microsoft 365 Copilot PremiumInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Check university licensing and your school allocation; use the institutional account.

  • NM Chat — clinical environmentTool mentioned; institutional access not establishedConditions apply

    Clinical institutional access through Citrix/VPN; no general student provisioning established.

  • Panopto — research restrictionTool mentioned; institutional access not establishedNot recommended

    Check the university service and research recording workflow; availability does not authorize non-public research uploads.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Held / removed from current conclusions · Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Exams · 9 more topics · Records involved: 37 (10 corrected / adjusted · 16 added · 11 held)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

26

Held conclusions and historical evidence (11)

These original records and prior review states are retained for provenance, not as current permissions, duties or precise deadlines.

Northwestern classifies data into four levels. Only Level 1 (non-confidential, public) data may be uploaded to publicly available generative AI tools. Data above Level 1 requires tools approved through Northwestern IT procurement and security review.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

nw-claim-005

To determine whether your data requires special attention, consult Northwestern Data Classification Policy. If your data is Level 1 (non-confidential and public data), uploading it to generative AI tools is permissible. To process data above Level 1, any generative AI tool must have been approved through Northwestern IT procurement and security review processes.

Adobe Creative Cloud is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-adobe-creative-cloud-226

Northwestern IT lists Adobe Creative Cloud for faculty and staff, with AI features and an annual cost.

ArcGIS is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-arcgis-227

Northwestern IT lists ArcGIS for faculty, staff, and students; feature access is included with Northwestern's ArcGIS license, while ArcGIS Online analysis may have an additional cost.

Amazon Bedrock on Amazon Web Services is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-aws-bedrock-228

Northwestern IT lists Amazon Bedrock on AWS for faculty, staff, and students with pay-as-you-go pricing; faculty and staff can set up a Northwestern-affiliated account.

Microsoft Foundry on Microsoft Azure is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-azure-ai-foundry-229

Northwestern IT lists Microsoft Foundry on Azure for faculty, staff, and students with pay-as-you-go pricing; faculty and staff can set up a Northwestern-affiliated account and students can get a $100 credit.

EndNote 2025 is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-endnote-232

Northwestern IT lists EndNote 2025, which includes AI search and summarization features and is free for Northwestern students, faculty, and staff.

GitHub Copilot is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-github-copilot-233

Northwestern IT lists GitHub Copilot for faculty, staff, and students, with a per-user cost in the Northwestern GitHub enterprise account and free access for students and teaching faculty through GitHub Education.

Vertex AI on Google Cloud is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-google-vertex-ai-234

Northwestern IT lists Vertex AI on Google Cloud for faculty, staff, and students with pay-as-you-go pricing and Northwestern-affiliated account setup paths.

Microsoft Copilot for Teams is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-microsoft-copilot-for-m365-237

Northwestern IT lists Microsoft Copilot for Teams for faculty and staff; it requires Microsoft 365 Copilot licensing.

Microsoft Teams Premium is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-teams-premium-239

Northwestern IT lists Microsoft Teams Premium for faculty and staff; it requires a Teams add-on license.

Zoom AI Companion Meeting Features is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

cl-northwestern-university-zoom-ai-companion-240

Northwestern IT lists Zoom AI Companion Meeting Features for faculty, staff, and students, included with a Northwestern Zoom account for meeting summaries, questions, and smart recordings.

Official sources

15 official URLs; 15 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Northwestern Office of the Provost — Principles Regarding Academic Integrity

www.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Northwestern Office of the Provost — Principles Regarding Academic Integrity · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.334Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

ea627eeb73f137cbbd6d3b312ecdb5f5325f0a86219b907e7ed017970ecb3877

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Northwestern IT — Instructor Options

www.it.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Northwestern IT — Instructor Options · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.334Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

ccdac576c85f8ac31cb5fa9096661eb3c31e91dc0db18dec7d396c61a4eab340

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Northwestern Guidance on the Use of Generative AI

www.it.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Northwestern Guidance on the Use of Generative AI · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.334Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

441ccaeec012e626fa11c755de9e20ad5a5c21dfb711609d5ee2fe4b1f0bbf1a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Getting Started with Generative AI

www.it.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Getting Started with Generative AI · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.334Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

e8af2814604066181ae2708c0a28e5cd957a6d6a6f61082105607d6ee4c1333e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Northwestern 2026–27 TGS Catalog — Academic Integrity

catalogs.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Northwestern 2026–27 TGS Catalog — Academic Integrity · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.592Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

fd4f7dfe494fdd81414e3732454c0374f996a0e2560e21756c087e52a830bf0b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Provost Academic Integrity — School Contacts

www.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Provost Academic Integrity — School Contacts · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.595Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

97ab8ee7ec8c2fd9838dcd99d4db36025b3287aef56f7482b7c6c725c3f91360

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Feinberg MD Education — Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools

www.feinberg.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Feinberg MD Education — Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.600Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

9ecb54687f9132299aa1c8dd13e22173a53dd69784d0bb550c9905d0c47df2a8

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Feinberg Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine — Using LLMs Responsibly

www.feinberg.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Feinberg Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine — Using LLMs Responsibly · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.762Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

1f6cd9bf05b5dd9a65a75be04bc0bdd82f635c06342086bfea74182c09d31868

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Kellogg 2025–26 Academic Policy Manual

www.kellogg.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Kellogg 2025–26 Academic Policy Manual · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.923Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

2a0dc751e1250c48bae4f238cd08527589638478ccca28cbc2eee86006b82e9f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Kellogg IT — AI Tools FAQ

kiskellogg.service-now.com

University official source

Hash and captured version

Kellogg IT — AI Tools FAQ · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.955Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

00fc4d4107a6189175930239aef637b94270843969dbb136ce18b50cce3b2d7b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

McCormick — Generative AI Tools

www.mccormick.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

McCormick — Generative AI Tools · 2026-10-22T22:41:44.956Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

941747622c0c77fdd721d72885e9c30050e8c52f6caf5d67ce9c17e36d175025

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Northwestern Pritzker Law — Generative AI

www.law.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Northwestern Pritzker Law — Generative AI · 2026-10-22T22:41:45.162Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

07293a4dea6dfe0d671c3b00029de86b9f9e73d58fce8490f7f3d70e8a797db6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Provost — 2026 Fall Quarter Guidance for Instructors

www.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Provost — 2026 Fall Quarter Guidance for Instructors · 2026-10-22T22:41:45.414Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

6d91d976262c0be7e30bc73bafa2330e212e2cee9be5a7aa414ace1177abcd22

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Provost — Seeking faculty input on AI-assisted grading

www.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Provost — Seeking faculty input on AI-assisted grading · 2026-10-22T22:41:45.452Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

2efc08dcbc561b933716d8eb3b2ff45a35dec4a48cbea77cdc064d6303265cf9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Northwestern IT — AI Transcription of Research Interviews

www.it.northwestern.edu

University official source

Hash and captured version

Northwestern IT — AI Transcription of Research Interviews · 2026-10-22T22:41:45.548Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

2ee7a6a1ccb18438e95cff8391e341257c20cea022d504a16e9675b04aa64a4e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
paris-northwestern-v6-r1-20261022
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

          Current reviewed JSON
          Questions students ask

          Questions students ask

          Can I use AI for my coursework?

          Follow the actual course and assignment instructions. Open, Conditional and Closed are instructor examples, not blanket student permission. Feinberg MD assignments require direct authorship unless specifically permitted; the Kellogg 2025–26 rule is historical.

          View evidence →
          Do I need to disclose AI use?

          Work submitted under your name needs proper attribution and authorization. Follow the task’s disclosure format; detailed prompt/verification lists in teaching examples are not a universal checklist, and citation does not authorize prohibited use.

          View evidence →
          Can I upload sensitive data?

          Use only the validated tool, intended use and applicable data-provider permission. Feinberg clinical PHI guidance, its MD policy, McCormick Level 3 ban and Pritzker’s some-Level-3 allowance have distinct scopes. No-training assurances do not remove sensitive-data or retention limits.

          View evidence →
          Which tools can I access?

          Copilot Chat is available through Northwestern accounts; paid M365 Copilot and school-funded ChatGPT/Claude seats have different eligibility. The SSO tool catalog remains unverified, and access never grants assessment permission.

          View evidence →
          What are the examination rules?

          Unauthorized examination aids are prohibited. The reviewed current university guidance does not establish one AI default for every exam; follow the instructor and school rules. The Kellogg 2025–26 manual must not be assumed current.

          View evidence →
          What rules apply to research and publication?

          Panopto should not be used for non-public research data in the interview-transcription guidance. Other research recording, IRB and sponsor conditions require separate checks; Feinberg MD publication/presentation disclosure follows journal or organization requirements.

          View evidence →
          What counts as academic misconduct?

          Unauthorized AI authorship may be cheating or plagiarism. Part C response, possible sanctions and appeals apply only to listed schools; professional schools differ. TGS’s written-decision appeal period and initial-notification finality wording must remain separate.

          View evidence →
          What guidance applies to teaching?

          Instructors can choose and communicate AI course policies; the Open/Conditional/Closed examples and Fall 2026 smart-glasses wording are recommendations. AI grading involving protected student information needs the stated agreements and security review.

          View evidence →
          What security and procurement requirements apply?

          Institutional data use requires the intended-use validation and data-provider permission in IT guidance. Protected grading data and school workspaces have additional agreements/restrictions; a catalog listing or no-training statement does not itself approve a use case.

          View evidence →
          When was this record checked?

          Record checked:

          Record version →
          Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
          Where can I read the full evidence?

          26 · Full policy evidence

          Full policy evidence →