Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR Last checked

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional

Follow the instructor’s written GenAI policy for the specific course. Faculty choose the policy and must notify students in writing; Registry says syllabi should state it. Unauthorized assistance and fabricated facts/references remain misconduct.

Official source ↗

Exams

Restricted

Under examination-condition rules, electronic devices including AI smart glasses must be beyond access unless explicitly permitted. Thesis and final-year-project examinations are excluded from these rules; course-specific instructions still matter.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Recommended

ITSO recommends acknowledging or labelling AI content when appropriate. Follow the actual course’s attribution and permitted-assistance rules; acknowledgement does not authorize a prohibited use.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Restricted

Avoid confidential, sensitive and personal inputs. Desensitization guidance for confidential university documents in commercial tools is not blanket permission for all personal data. Open WebUI states30-day chat history; other logs and vendor retention are not established.

Official source ↗

Tools and access

Conditional

ITSO offers distinct tools and accounts. Gemini Enterprise EDU includes individual student subscriptions or programme sponsorship; staff M365 Copilot needs a paid additional licence. GenAI Platform is listed as a hosted institutional service, not user self-deployment. Access is not assessment permission.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Restricted

Research-integrity and award-related student misconduct follow distinct routes. For UROP reports, AI may support consultation but not the final write-up; supervisor conditions and research privacy/ethics still apply.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Restricted

Unauthorized assistance and fabrication may trigger student misconduct procedures. Grade review uses10 working days from release, accepted review within15 working days from release, and Dean appeal10 working days from receipt of the department decision. Misconduct appeals have separate14-calendar-day written-notification clocks.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Recommended

Faculty set and communicate course AI policies. CEI advises assessment design that does not rely solely on AI-text detectors; this is not an institutional detector ban. Restricted guidebook/report full texts remain unavailable.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Unclear

Public guidance establishes data-protection cautions, but does not establish a complete procurement/security-approval or vendor-log retention process. Consult the exact service and institutional requirements.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check the instructor’s written course policy.
    Site advice
  • Follow task attribution rules and acknowledge AI when appropriate.
    Source guidance
  • Use the right review route and counting start event.
    Site advice

Don’t

  • Do not treat a tool account as permission for assessed work.
    Site advice
  • Do not assume desensitizing personal data authorizes upload.
    Site advice
  • Do not use AI to produce a UROP final report write-up.
    Requirement in this scope

AI use questioned?

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

The course, examination conditions, service account and research programme determine the applicable rules. Grade review and misconduct appeals are separate.

Investigation & response

Students facing misconduct reports are informed of the allegation and can respond and present evidence. Possible sanctions include reduced assessment marks or failed grades, while certain repeat-offence sanctions normally apply.

Original evidence and scope

Students facing misconduct reports are informed of the allegation and can respond and present evidence. Possible sanctions include reduced assessment marks or failed grades, while certain repeat-offence sanctions normally apply.

hkust-new-20261022-005

student disciplinary process

13. A student shall be informed of the report on academic misconduct made against him/her, and asked to attend a meeting with the Head of Department/Division, to respond to the case and present relevant evidence if any. If a student refuses, or is unable, to attend the meeting, the Head of Department/Division shall review the case based on the evidence available to him/her.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L95-L95', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 ca4b4eaabfb3fd1ca33b9a13e55aeea468fd87229b0b1aa9f0fa293bceb3a5f9; original binding lines 296–296; characters 9772–10148; excerpt offset 0–376

Official university source ↗
A reduced grade for the component of the course assessment in question or a reduced grade for the course, including a failed grade;

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L98-L104', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 ca4b4eaabfb3fd1ca33b9a13e55aeea468fd87229b0b1aa9f0fa293bceb3a5f9; original binding lines 308–308; characters 10642–10773; excerpt offset 0–131

Official university source ↗
Notation by the Academic Registrar of academic misconduct on the student’s transcript, to be removed at a specified time, or upon graduation, or to retain as a permanent record (this sanction will normally be applied automatically in cases of 2 or more confirmed cases of academic misconduct, notwithstanding any additional sanctions that may also be applied);

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L112-L119', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 ca4b4eaabfb3fd1ca33b9a13e55aeea468fd87229b0b1aa9f0fa293bceb3a5f9; original binding lines 329–329; characters 13120–13480; excerpt offset 0–360

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

Students facing misconduct reports are informed of the allegation and can respond and present evidence. Possible sanctions include reduced assessment marks or failed grades, while certain repeat-offence sanctions normally apply.

Original evidence and scope

Students facing misconduct reports are informed of the allegation and can respond and present evidence. Possible sanctions include reduced assessment marks or failed grades, while certain repeat-offence sanctions normally apply.

hkust-new-20261022-005

student disciplinary process

13. A student shall be informed of the report on academic misconduct made against him/her, and asked to attend a meeting with the Head of Department/Division, to respond to the case and present relevant evidence if any. If a student refuses, or is unable, to attend the meeting, the Head of Department/Division shall review the case based on the evidence available to him/her.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L95-L95', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 ca4b4eaabfb3fd1ca33b9a13e55aeea468fd87229b0b1aa9f0fa293bceb3a5f9; original binding lines 296–296; characters 9772–10148; excerpt offset 0–376

Official university source ↗
A reduced grade for the component of the course assessment in question or a reduced grade for the course, including a failed grade;

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L98-L104', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 ca4b4eaabfb3fd1ca33b9a13e55aeea468fd87229b0b1aa9f0fa293bceb3a5f9; original binding lines 308–308; characters 10642–10773; excerpt offset 0–131

Official university source ↗
Notation by the Academic Registrar of academic misconduct on the student’s transcript, to be removed at a specified time, or upon graduation, or to retain as a permanent record (this sanction will normally be applied automatically in cases of 2 or more confirmed cases of academic misconduct, notwithstanding any additional sanctions that may also be applied);

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L112-L119', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 ca4b4eaabfb3fd1ca33b9a13e55aeea468fd87229b0b1aa9f0fa293bceb3a5f9; original binding lines 329–329; characters 13120–13480; excerpt offset 0–360

Official university source ↗

Review & appeal

Appeals against Head or Dean academic-misconduct sanctions go to the Provost within 14 calendar days of the dated written notification; appeals against Senate SDC decisions go to the President within 14 calendar days of the dated written communication.

Original evidence and scope

Appeals against Head or Dean academic-misconduct sanctions go to the Provost within 14 calendar days of the dated written notification; appeals against Senate SDC decisions go to the President within 14 calendar days of the dated written communication.

hkust-new-20261022-006

student misconduct appeals

21. Students desiring to appeal against the sanction imposed by the Head of Department/Division or Dean may submit a written appeal to the Provost within fourteen calendar days of the date of the written communication informing the student of the Head of Department/Division/Dean’s decision, stating the grounds for the appeal. The Head of Department/Division/Dean’s decision remains effective pending outcome of the appeal.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L127-L129', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 ca4b4eaabfb3fd1ca33b9a13e55aeea468fd87229b0b1aa9f0fa293bceb3a5f9; original binding lines 338–338; characters 15153–15577; excerpt offset 0–424

Official university source ↗
31. Students desiring to appeal against decisions of the Senate SDC may submit a written appeal to the President within fourteen calendar days of the date of the written communication informing the student of the Senate SDC’s decision, stating the grounds for the appeal. The Senate SDC’s decision shall remain effective pending outcome of the appeal, unless the President directs otherwise.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L149-L151', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 ca4b4eaabfb3fd1ca33b9a13e55aeea468fd87229b0b1aa9f0fa293bceb3a5f9; original binding lines 362–362; characters 18830–19221; excerpt offset 0–391

Official university source ↗

For the 2026-27 academic year, course-grade review requests go to the Head in writing within 10 working days of grade release, a fee applies, accepted reviews are arranged within 15 working days of grade release and the result may lower a grade.

Original evidence and scope

For the 2026-27 academic year, course-grade review requests go to the Head in writing within 10 working days of grade release, a fee applies, accepted reviews are arranged within 15 working days of grade release and the result may lower a grade.

hkust-new-20261022-007

Current Registry grade review guidance and UG2026–27; original PG and fee-amount source capture gap retained.

Students who consider that a mistake has been made in the process of calculating or determining a grade for a course may apply for a review of the grade to the Head of the course-offering department/unit in writing within ten working days from the day on which grades are released. A fee is applied.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L57-L59', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 1449de184b0f9ce71c93212ec4e1c173c06b571930faac44b0419821b2f53885; original binding lines 255–255; characters 3465–3764; excerpt offset 0–299

Official university source ↗
Students should be warned that a grade review might lead to a lower grade being assigned. If a review request is accepted, the Head will arrange for the review within fifteen working days after the release of the grade and the fee will be refunded if the review results in a change of grade.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L65-L66', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 1449de184b0f9ce71c93212ec4e1c173c06b571930faac44b0419821b2f53885; original binding lines 263–263; characters 3929–4221; excerpt offset 0–292

Official university source ↗
Students who consider that a mistake has been made in the process of calculating or determining a grade for a course may apply for a review of the grade to the Head of the course-offering department/unit in writing within ten working days from the day on which grades are released. A fee is applied.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L322-L323', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 84fcfe927c2c1cb958e25e426597e7b6d1feab121432d7ab87f2fbb73a7d93b7; original binding lines 521–521; characters 24739–25038; excerpt offset 0–299

Official university source ↗

Appeal a course-grade-review decision to the School/AIS Dean within 10 working days after receipt of the departmental decision; appeals generally require procedural irregularity or justified new evidence. This is separate from misconduct appeals.

Original evidence and scope

Appeal a course-grade-review decision to the School/AIS Dean within 10 working days after receipt of the departmental decision; appeals generally require procedural irregularity or justified new evidence. This is separate from misconduct appeals.

hkust-new-20261022-008

grade appeals 2026-27

Requests for review of course grades should normally be resolved at the Department/unit level.  Students who wish to appeal against the decision of the department/unit must do so in writing to the School Dean/AIS Dean within ten working days of receiving the decision, stating the grounds for the appeal. Appeals shall generally be considered only on the basis of procedural irregularity and/or new evidence, accompanied by a justification for the failure to submit this evidence to the Head of department during the initial stage of grade review.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L66-L67', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 1449de184b0f9ce71c93212ec4e1c173c06b571930faac44b0419821b2f53885; original binding lines 264–264; characters 4222–4770; excerpt offset 0–548

Official university source ↗
Requests for review of course grades should normally be resolved at the Department/unit level.  Students who wish to appeal against the decision of the department/unit must do so in writing to the School Dean/AIS Dean within ten working days of receiving the decision, stating the grounds for the appeal. Appeals shall generally be considered only on the basis of procedural irregularity and/or new evidence, accompanied by a justification for the failure to submit this evidence to the Head of department during the initial stage of grade review.

Captured source text; {'kind': 'web_extracted_lines', 'webLineRange': 'L67-L68', 'pdfPhysicalPage': None, 'pdfPrintedPage': None, 'pdfPageIndexZeroBased': None} (research locator context; actual captured line range below); Extracted text SHA256 1449de184b0f9ce71c93212ec4e1c173c06b571930faac44b0419821b2f53885; original binding lines 264–264; characters 4222–4770; excerpt offset 0–548

Official university source ↗

AI tools & access

  • Microsoft Copilot ChatInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Use HKUST institutional sign-in.

  • Gemini Enterprise EDUInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Obtain the applicable EDU licence and sign in with HKUST account.

  • Open WebUIInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply

    Sign in with HKUST account; check credits and current service conditions.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Exams · 10 more topics · Records involved: 26 (12 corrected / adjusted · 14 added)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

26

Official sources

14 official URLs; 14 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Assessment Policies and Procedures | Academic Registry

registry.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Assessment Policies and Procedures | Academic Registry · 2026-10-23T01:29:02.303838Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

63378eb964d1ed527830fc041a404eab0df09b11bcdb13c4ae14803f6b4dced0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Guidelines and Policies | Center for Education Innovation

cei.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Guidelines and Policies | Center for Education Innovation · 2026-10-23T01:29:02.304261Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a3b207f55df77ae44cf829af6a04be35a080f7f7998a0283958425f3055ddd4a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Assessment Design | CEI

cei.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Assessment Design | CEI · 2026-10-23T01:29:02.304376Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

833b7c2a57f7266c25d5559d7e2a33da80f86ce6f46a3fc4d3ac02d8ee105534

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Comparison of Generative AI Tools | ITSO

itso.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Comparison of Generative AI Tools | ITSO · 2026-10-23T01:29:02.304464Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

593dcd0a7d2dbf0c553bd74dc039168743586cb7fce3c15aeb6caba3aea52fbd

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Rules for the Conduct of Examinations | Academic Registry

registry.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Rules for the Conduct of Examinations | Academic Registry · 2026-10-23T01:29:03.790585Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

038aeb4d87d83b5f046d02c44f53c61d070209266ae8c8ff4c055a381d4e853f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Grade Review, Student Appeals and Grade Changes | Academic Registry

registry.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Grade Review, Student Appeals and Grade Changes | Academic Registry · 2026-10-23T01:29:03.876599Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

f038a241a42d2e4387885247eb1457166adcf40c232d03d20080cfffeaf6a9ff

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI Usage Guidelines | ITSO

itso.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Generative AI Usage Guidelines | ITSO · 2026-10-23T01:29:03.978746Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

75fa7dc4e488f30db7e33eb1dd21d697d59a06c0bbc22e9242dd53db08bc5166

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

HUMA2661 Course Syllabus (Summer 2025) | HKUST

huma.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

HUMA2661 Course Syllabus (Summer 2025) | HKUST · 2026-10-23T01:29:03.996108Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

f182b8513e4dc32329d44d6e41e75dbef50a35c0e6c0cf02b1fc3f270cd4e09a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Regulations for Student Academic Integrity | Academic Registry

registry.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Regulations for Student Academic Integrity | Academic Registry · 2026-10-23T01:29:04.959671Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

aeff9ddea4f06090eb9db2181b41863948e5b5e909f42880c69bcee458f45d6b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI Tools | ITSO

itso.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Generative AI Tools | ITSO · 2026-10-23T01:29:04.994687Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

4bfdc40a85570d60d0470274168c8f61f05d4b75fee9c0aa74cddc1d95c883f3

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Responsible Use of AI - FAQs | HKUST Library

libguides.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Responsible Use of AI - FAQs | HKUST Library · 2026-10-23T01:29:05.232847Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

0fa1707175310cd75eef752267c99b26ddd22e1286927f2efdd540b076303875

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Policy on Research Conduct and Integrity | VPRD

vprd.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Policy on Research Conduct and Integrity | VPRD · 2026-10-23T01:29:06.045398Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

9f4f39e1534f48171a66c1a3a7bf33bd9b0e39fe5cd24a8c0a7a70cfb5a4862e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Academic Regulations Governing UG Studies, 2026-27

registry.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Academic Regulations Governing UG Studies, 2026-27 · 2026-10-23T01:29:06.092735Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

f7f077ded11a91c8adf81844f449f9db5ab4ab970bbeb75a603274e7f39910be

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Information for Students | UROP

urop.hkust.edu.hk

University official source

Hash and captured version

Information for Students | UROP · 2026-10-23T01:29:06.237155Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

c3ede89e802b09822b6b7783f9fb350cbf2e5c79d47c428d40cf4320bb676384

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
uq-hkust-michigan-v6-r4-20261022
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • All53 original objects,12 publicIDs and15 historical tool variants preserved;17 original remaining keys retained.
  • July2026 CEI guidebook and August2026 detector report require SSO; no full text or approval inferred.
  • LANG4030 PDF page verification and ISOM2010 full text remain frozen research gaps; not selected for current conclusions.
  • HUMA2661 Summer2025 PDF is historical only; not a campus examination default.
  • Bound source original files are captured only for selected display inputs. Three evidence IDs (desens,grade_fee,grade_pg) remain not rebound; fee amount and PG-specific byte verification not asserted.
  • No blanket procurement, security-log/vendor retention or every-course permission established.
  • Snapshot, public/API/MCP/search/history/release approval are separate and unchanged.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Follow the instructor’s written GenAI policy for the specific course. Faculty choose the policy and must notify students in writing; Registry says syllabi should state it. Unauthorized assistance and fabricated facts/references remain misconduct.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        ITSO recommends acknowledging or labelling AI content when appropriate. Follow the actual course’s attribution and permitted-assistance rules; acknowledgement does not authorize a prohibited use.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Avoid confidential, sensitive and personal inputs. Desensitization guidance for confidential university documents in commercial tools is not blanket permission for all personal data. Open WebUI states30-day chat history; other logs and vendor retention are not established.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        ITSO offers distinct tools and accounts. Gemini Enterprise EDU includes individual student subscriptions or programme sponsorship; staff M365 Copilot needs a paid additional licence. GenAI Platform is listed as a hosted institutional service, not user self-deployment. Access is not assessment permission.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        Under examination-condition rules, electronic devices including AI smart glasses must be beyond access unless explicitly permitted. Thesis and final-year-project examinations are excluded from these rules; course-specific instructions still matter.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Research-integrity and award-related student misconduct follow distinct routes. For UROP reports, AI may support consultation but not the final write-up; supervisor conditions and research privacy/ethics still apply.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Unauthorized assistance and fabrication may trigger student misconduct procedures. Grade review uses10 working days from release, accepted review within15 working days from release, and Dean appeal10 working days from receipt of the department decision. Misconduct appeals have separate14-calendar-day written-notification clocks.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Faculty set and communicate course AI policies. CEI advises assessment design that does not rely solely on AI-text detectors; this is not an institutional detector ban. Restricted guidebook/report full texts remain unavailable.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        Public guidance establishes data-protection cautions, but does not establish a complete procurement/security-approval or vendor-log retention process. Consult the exact service and institutional requirements.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        26 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology AI Policy