Policy presence
Hong Kong Baptist University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
Hong Kong Baptist University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Hong Kong Baptist University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Hong Kong Baptist University has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Hong Kong Baptist University has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Hong Kong Baptist University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Hong Kong Baptist University has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Hong Kong Baptist University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Hong Kong Baptist University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Hong Kong Baptist University
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Improper use of Generative AI involves: copying from an output, text or non-text, generated by AI without acknowledging such use.
Source Status
Original evidence
Evidence 1The e-Learning Committee (ELC) established the Generative AI Tools Task Force (GAITF) to develop principles, guidelines, and policies for the use of generative AI tools in the University.
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Principles for the Use of Generative AI Tools in Teaching and Learning, and Assessment @ HKBU. Approved by the Senate in June 2023, effective from AY2023/2024.
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI-Empowering: to embrace generative AI and empower students and instructors... AI-Critical: to encourage healthy, informed scepticism... AI-Ethical: to maintain academic integrity, transparency and the ethical use of generative AI tools... Build and sustain human uniqueness
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1The consequences of cheating in examinations, plagiarism, and other forms of academic dishonesty include reduced or failure grades, suspension of study, or even academic dismissal.
Ai Tool Treatment
Original evidence
Evidence 1The HKBU GenAI Platform (“GenAI Platform”) is based on the generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) language model developed by third-party AI service providers including Anthropic, Google, Meta AI and OpenAI.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
ar.hkbu.edu.hk
chtl.hkbu.edu.hk