University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Język
ENZHFRPL

Casuarina, Australia

Charles Darwin University

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =584Updated19 lip 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

10 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

AI Design Assistant is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność97%

Wartość znormalizowana: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"AI Design Assistant","description":"Lecturer-controlled AI design assistant presented in CDU's staff AI resources.","howToObtain":"Access through CDU's staff AI resources when enabled by the lecturer.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Ostatnio sprawdzono
19 lip 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
19 lip 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.

Widok lokalny only

CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
c7c98742…
Pobrano
19 lip 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Web is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność97%

Wartość znormalizowana: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Web","description":"Free Microsoft Copilot web access for CDU students.","howToObtain":"Use the Copilot link from CDU's AI resources and authenticate as directed.","costToUser":"Free.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Ostatnio sprawdzono
19 lip 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
19 lip 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.

Widok lokalny only

CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
a9a3684b…
Pobrano
19 lip 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność96%

Wartość znormalizowana: formal_genai_policy_applies_employees_students

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
This policy sets out principles for the use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) at the University. This policy applies to all employees and students of the University.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
80db2f71…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Sections 2-3, paragraphs 2-3

Prywatność

CDU prohibits employees and students from putting confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into GenAI platforms.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: no_confidential_sensitive_information_or_ip_in_genai

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Employees and students must ensure they do not put confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into gen AI platforms.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
80db2f71…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Data, privacy, and security, paragraph 21

Security Review

CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: staff_legitimate_work_use_with_security_and_data_handling_limits

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes; however, University information that is confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable must not be entered into such tools unless it has been appropriately de-identified or redacted. Where the hosting location, ownership, or data-handling practices of a generative AI tool are unknown or unclear, the tool must not be used with University information.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
87b58795…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Use of generative AI tools, paragraph 49

Badania

CDU's GenAI policy says GenAI use is never acceptable in peer review, in generating substantive content of research outputs including HDR theses, or in writing critical components of ethics applications.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: genai_never_acceptable_peer_review_substantive_research_outputs_ethics_application_components

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
There are circumstances when the use of gen AI is never acceptable. This includes in the conduct of peer review, the generation of substantive content of research outputs, including HDR theses, and in the writing of the critical components of ethics applications.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
80db2f71…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Research, paragraph 33

Zamówienia publiczne

CDU says it does not generally maintain a static approved, preferred, or endorsed GenAI platform list, and Design Authority approval is required before institutionally adopting new GenAI platforms that are implemented, integrated, or used to process University data.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: no_static_approved_platform_list_design_authority_required_for_institutional_adoption

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
The University does not generally maintain a static list of "approved", "preferred", or "endorsed" gen AI platforms. Approval by the Design Authority is required prior to the adoption of new gen AI platforms where they are to be institutionally implemented, integrated with University systems, or used to process University data.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
80db2f71…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Platforms and usage, paragraphs 10-11

Academic Integrity

CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: genai_use_disclosure_required

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Students and employees must be transparent about and disclose gen AI use and should refer to the Academic Integrity Policy for more guidance on academic integrity.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
80db2f71…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Integrity, paragraph 18

Academic Integrity

CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność92%

Wartość znormalizowana: inappropriate_or_unsanctioned_genai_use_academic_misconduct

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Types of Academic Misconduct include Generative artificial intelligence: Inappropriate or unsanctioned use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. CDU staff and students will not tolerate: Misrepresenting AI generated content as your own; Failure to disclose use of AI.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
d7737b90…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Types of Academic Misconduct; Academic Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence

Badania

For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność90%

Wartość znormalizowana: hdr_genai_assist_not_replace_acknowledge_no_ai_supervisor_examiner_assessment

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
GenAI tools may assist but should not replace the candidate's original intellectual contribution. Do I need to acknowledge GenAI use? Yes--clearly. Can I use GenAI to read, critique, or offer feedback on student work? No. Can I use GenAI to assess or critique candidate work? No.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b47798a2…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
HDR studies FAQ for students, supervisors, and external examiners

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność97%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Charles Darwin University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/charles-darwin-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian