research
CDU's GenAI policy says GenAI use is never acceptable in peer review, in generating substantive content of research outputs including HDR theses, or in writing critical components of ethics applications.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Charles Darwin University
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Charles Darwin University currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
8 claim records
research
For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
CDU prohibits employees and students from putting confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into GenAI platforms.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
CDU says it does not generally maintain a static approved, preferred, or endorsed GenAI platform list, and Design Authority approval is required before institutionally adopting new GenAI platforms that are implemented, integrated, or used to process University data.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
Academic Integrity
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 9:28 PM
Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 9:22 PM
Information Security and Access Policy
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 9:25 PM
Using generative AI (GenAI) in HDR studies
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 9:31 PM