Casuarina, Australia

Charles Darwin University

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

10 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

AI Design Assistant is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"AI Design Assistant","description":"Lecturer-controlled AI design assistant presented in CDU's staff AI resources.","howToObtain":"Access through CDU's staff AI resources when enabled by the lecturer.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Original evidence

Evidence 1
CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.

Localized display only

CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Web is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Web","description":"Free Microsoft Copilot web access for CDU students.","howToObtain":"Use the Copilot link from CDU's AI resources and authenticate as directed.","costToUser":"Free.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Original evidence

Evidence 1
CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.

Localized display only

CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.

Ai Tool Treatment

Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: formal_genai_policy_applies_employees_students

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This policy sets out principles for the use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) at the University. This policy applies to all employees and students of the University.

Privacy

CDU prohibits employees and students from putting confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into GenAI platforms.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: no_confidential_sensitive_information_or_ip_in_genai

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Employees and students must ensure they do not put confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into gen AI platforms.

Security Review

CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: staff_legitimate_work_use_with_security_and_data_handling_limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes; however, University information that is confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable must not be entered into such tools unless it has been appropriately de-identified or redacted. Where the hosting location, ownership, or data-handling practices of a generative AI tool are unknown or unclear, the tool must not be used with University information.

Research

CDU's GenAI policy says GenAI use is never acceptable in peer review, in generating substantive content of research outputs including HDR theses, or in writing critical components of ethics applications.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: genai_never_acceptable_peer_review_substantive_research_outputs_ethics_application_components

Original evidence

Evidence 1
There are circumstances when the use of gen AI is never acceptable. This includes in the conduct of peer review, the generation of substantive content of research outputs, including HDR theses, and in the writing of the critical components of ethics applications.

Procurement

CDU says it does not generally maintain a static approved, preferred, or endorsed GenAI platform list, and Design Authority approval is required before institutionally adopting new GenAI platforms that are implemented, integrated, or used to process University data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: no_static_approved_platform_list_design_authority_required_for_institutional_adoption

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The University does not generally maintain a static list of "approved", "preferred", or "endorsed" gen AI platforms. Approval by the Design Authority is required prior to the adoption of new gen AI platforms where they are to be institutionally implemented, integrated with University systems, or used to process University data.

Academic Integrity

CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: genai_use_disclosure_required

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Students and employees must be transparent about and disclose gen AI use and should refer to the Academic Integrity Policy for more guidance on academic integrity.

Academic Integrity

CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: inappropriate_or_unsanctioned_genai_use_academic_misconduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Types of Academic Misconduct include Generative artificial intelligence: Inappropriate or unsanctioned use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. CDU staff and students will not tolerate: Misrepresenting AI generated content as your own; Failure to disclose use of AI.

Research

For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: hdr_genai_assist_not_replace_acknowledge_no_ai_supervisor_examiner_assessment

Original evidence

Evidence 1
GenAI tools may assist but should not replace the candidate's original intellectual contribution. Do I need to acknowledge GenAI use? Yes--clearly. Can I use GenAI to read, critique, or offer feedback on student work? No. Can I use GenAI to assess or critique candidate work? No.

Source record

Official sources

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Charles Darwin University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/charles-darwin-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log