Haymarket, Australia Last checked

University of Technology Sydney

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Check the applicable scope

Course permission is determined by subject coordinator; allowed AI material still needs acknowledgement.

Official source ↗

Exams

Check the applicable scope

No exam-specific AI permission verified.

AI disclosure

Check the applicable scope

Students must acknowledge AI use in assessments; verbatim generation requires instructor direction.

Official source ↗

Privacy & data

Check the applicable scope

Library advises not to input personal, confidential, assignment or research text into GenAI.

Official source ↗

Approved tools

Check the applicable scope

Library lists UTS-signed-in Copilot and catalogue Research Assistant; no blanket assessment authorization.

Official source ↗

Research & publication

Check the applicable scope

Research guidance calls for confidentiality and licence checks; publication rules need further verification.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Check the applicable scope

Unallowed AI assignment content is considered misconduct in UTS Library guidance.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Check the applicable scope

Faculty-facing subject guidance recommends discipline-sensitive AI instructions and student acknowledgement.

Official source ↗

Security & procurement

Check the applicable scope

Institutional AI system lifecycle follows a six-stage process; research is separately governed.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check subject coordinator guidance before using GenAI for assessed work.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Acknowledge GenAI content appropriately even when permitted.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Use UTS sign-in for the described protected Copilot experience.
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Do not assume institutionally available tools are permitted in assignments.
    Site advice
  • UTS guidance advises not entering personal details, confidential data or text from assignments or research into GenAI.
    Source guidance

AI use questioned?

University of Technology Sydney

Subject coordinators set assessment AI permissions; UTS sign-in for Microsoft Copilot provides commercial data protection for learning support but never grants assignment permission, and AI Operations Policy (effective 28 May 2026) governs institutional operations.

Investigation & response

Using generative AI in assessments without subject coordinator permission or required acknowledgement may be treated as academic misconduct; full current Student Rules Section 16 notice and appeal day-counts were not extracted in full and remain unverified.

Original evidence and scope

Using generative AI in assessments without subject coordinator permission or required acknowledgement may be treated as academic misconduct; full current Student Rules Section 16 notice and appeal day-counts were not extracted in full and remain unverified.

academic_integrity:draft-procedure-1

UTS academic integrity guidance on unpermitted AI use; complete current Student Rules Section 16 misconduct clauses and appeal windows remain unverified.

If the use of GenAI has not been allowed by your subject coordinator, using this content in your assignment is considered academic misconduct (cheating). Even when the use of GenAI is allowed, any content that you use must be appropriately referenced or acknowledged.

Ethics and GenAI; SHA-256 identifies this retained UTF-8 excerpt, not raw HTML/PDF; physical page and original offsets unavailable.

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

Copilot

DALL-E

Library Research Assistant

Microsoft Copilot

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

3

Historical and pending public Claims (6)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-university-of-technology-sydney-microsoft-copilot-369 · excluded_pending_review

UTS / students/researchers as cited

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (OVERSTATED: 访问可用不等于作业可用;officially endorsed需限于学习支持渠道).

Record history

cl-university-of-technology-sydney-primo-research-assistant-370 · excluded_pending_review

UTS / students/researchers as cited

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (OVERSTATED: 图书馆启用工具不代表考核许可).

Record history

cl-uts-research-genai-confidentiality-and-it-policies · excluded_pending_review

UTS / students/researchers as cited

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (VERIFIED: 科研数据保密及IT设备条件分开).

Record history

cl-uts-assessment-ai-acknowledgement-and-verbatim-materials · excluded_pending_review

UTS / students/researchers as cited

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (VERIFIED: 认可AI使用及verbatim材料须区分教师指示).

Record history

cl-uts-library-genai-academic-integrity-and-confidential-data · excluded_pending_review

UTS / students/researchers as cited

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (VERIFIED: 图书馆建议与具体课程授权强度须准确).

Record history

cl-uts-copilot-protected-version-preferred-learning-tool · excluded_pending_review

UTS / students/researchers as cited

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (OVERSTATED: 受保护版本不用于模型训练不等于零留存;不得保证所有文件绝对安全).

Record history

Official sources

7 official URLs; 8 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Artificial Intelligence Operations Policy

www.uts.edu.au

University official source

uts.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Artificial Intelligence Operations Policy · 2026-05-14T02:56:34.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

78437f79631f8ab40e13dee4a8fc87deaad8f192aed5689093d721f38bbf0fc6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Artificial Intelligence Operations Procedure

www.uts.edu.au

University official source

uts.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Artificial Intelligence Operations Procedure · 2026-05-14T02:56:34.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

46766c8e484b98ce85d72c7e9f3bf18ba878ae38e5d25bfc43911567962790b7

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Developing guidelines for generative AI in your subject

educationexpress.uts.edu.au

University official source

educationexpress.uts.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Developing guidelines for generative AI in your subject · 2026-05-14T02:56:34.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

0a5f3b7aeae157881563bad612dfc0a94f2d9dcfb0a26d55f9e03147c58c1b0b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI: Ethical Use and Evaluation

studyguides.lib.uts.edu.au

University official source

studyguides.lib.uts.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Generative AI: Ethical Use and Evaluation · 2026-05-14T02:56:34.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

a4304f2456029aca63b30299f56f50bf7f8c74843a7156d2422dc326649a74d0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI: Referencing and Acknowledging AI

studyguides.lib.uts.edu.au

University official source

studyguides.lib.uts.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Generative AI: Referencing and Acknowledging AI · 2026-05-14T02:56:34.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

928da82cdfe04a69d14d7c2ac1ef24c03fb67dc9f4634c9ed61d2fecf7942aab

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI: UTS Tools

studyguides.lib.uts.edu.au

University official source

studyguides.lib.uts.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Generative AI: UTS Tools · 2026-05-14T02:56:34.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

2de7d2cf12dad764db037b3c29a2b99ff6b224ca4722abd5c2309cd52d6d9c5b

UTS Tools - Generative AI - Study Guides at University of Technology Sydney · 2026-07-15T23:29:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

40f6d6299541a1f159271e9e9b7cb74fcf4465cfbbc2e6c00d66d783b5e03b7f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Use of AI in Research Guidelines

www.uts.edu.au

University official source

uts.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Use of AI in Research Guidelines · 2026-05-14T02:56:34.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

2c624a69c29d1a4f1db9007f522aec514dd3ecacc55eda98e98daa95b049f231

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs91-100-v6-presentation-r1-20261026
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
  • No raw original byte capture due container network DNS failure
  • No independent fully verified appeal periods
  • No student snapshot eligible via MCP
  • No tool pagination/complete records
  • Full raw HTML/PDF source bytes were not closed-loop archived in the research package; SHA-256 hashes on topic excerpts identify UTF-8 excerpt text only.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Course permission is determined by subject coordinator; allowed AI material still needs acknowledgement.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Students must acknowledge AI use in assessments; verbatim generation requires instructor direction.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Library advises not to input personal, confidential, assignment or research text into GenAI.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        Library lists UTS-signed-in Copilot and catalogue Research Assistant; no blanket assessment authorization.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        No exam-specific AI permission verified.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Research guidance calls for confidentiality and licence checks; publication rules need further verification.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Unallowed AI assignment content is considered misconduct in UTS Library guidance.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Faculty-facing subject guidance recommends discipline-sensitive AI instructions and student acknowledgement.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        Institutional AI system lifecycle follows a six-stage process; research is separately governed.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        9 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →