University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPLES

London, United Kingdom

Royal Holloway, University of London

ClasificaciónQS World University Rankings 2026: =461Updated16 may 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

7 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%

Valor normalizado: ai_commissioning_and_unauthorised_ai_in_regulations

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.

Vista localizada only

Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
22a9f752…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Regulations on Academic Misconduct 2025/26, section 1(2)(b)-(c)

Investigación

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%

Valor normalizado: pgr_ai_may_not_author_research_claims_or_thesis_prose

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.

Vista localizada only

Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
3b1a0e17…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Principles and scope

Academic Integrity

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Valor normalizado: ai_declaration_and_prompt_list_required

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Vista localizada only

Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
760f945e…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
The Requirement of Declaration Statements; Prompt List

Privacidad

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Valor normalizado: pgr_no_confidential_personal_sensitive_data_to_third_party_ai_without_dpa_consent

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.

Vista localizada only

Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
3b1a0e17…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Principles and scope; Data, privacy, and confidentiality

Ai Tool Treatment

Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Valor normalizado: assessment_brief_precedence

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Vista localizada only

This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
8fac0216…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Key principles for using AI at Royal Holloway

Ai Tool Treatment

Royal Holloway recommends Microsoft Copilot for generative AI use when students log in with Royal Holloway account details, and warns students to be extremely careful when entering data into other generative AI tools.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%

Valor normalizado: microsoft_copilot_recommended_with_rhul_login

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.

Vista localizada only

From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
4bcf2424…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
AI Tools

Source Status

The official AI guidance verified in this crawl is scoped to Foundation, undergraduate, postgraduate taught students, and postgraduate researchers; this crawl did not verify a separate staff-wide binding AI teaching policy.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza78%

Valor normalizado: verified_sources_student_and_pgr_scoped_no_staffwide_policy_found

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

Vista localizada only

Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
8fac0216…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Guidance scope statements

Evidencia original

Evidencia 2
This guidance sets out expectations for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence by postgraduate researchers. It aligns with institutional research integrity, data protection, and academic misconduct regulations.

Vista localizada only

This guidance sets out expectations for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence by postgraduate researchers. It aligns with institutional research integrity, data protection, and academic misconduct regulations.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
3b1a0e17…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Guidance scope statements

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

8 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza96%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Royal Holloway, University of London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/royal-holloway-university-of-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios