Chicago, United States

Illinois Institute of Technology

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

5 reviewed claims

Source Status

Illinois Tech publishes official Academic Affairs guidance on academic honesty and generative AI, and related Center for Learning Innovation resources for teaching and learning with AI.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Valor normalizado: official_ai_guidance_found

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
This guideline on academic honesty and generative AI is intended to provide guidance for both students and faculty on engaging with generative AI productively, while still maintaining a rigorous and honest academic environment.

Academic Integrity

Illinois Tech's Academic Affairs guidance ties permitted use of generative AI or other outside resources to each course's learning objectives and syllabus expectations.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%

Valor normalizado: ai_use_course_objective_dependent

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
This means that each syllabus needs to clearly define what the learning objectives are and be clear as to what is and is not allowed in terms of "outside" resources to demonstrate proficiency with that learning objective.

Academic Integrity

Illinois Tech guidance says misrepresenting proficiency by submitting someone else's product, directly or indirectly, is academic dishonesty.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Valor normalizado: misrepresentation_dishonesty

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Therefore, misrepresentation of proficiency by (getting either directly or indirectly someone else’s) product is dishonesty. It cheats the student of their needed personal development, and it is academic dishonesty, which results in disciplinary action.

Enseñanza

Illinois Tech's Center for Learning Innovation asks faculty to provide clear syllabus expectations for AI use and provides suggested syllabus language for no, some, and significant AI use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Valor normalizado: syllabus_ai_expectations_guidance

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
In the interest of transparency and academic integrity, faculty are asked to ensure their syllabus provides students with clear expectations regarding the use of AI in their courses. Below are recommended statements dependent on instructor expectations.

Enseñanza

Illinois Tech's suggested AI and assessment syllabus language says AI-assisted grading support should be explicitly stated in assignment instructions when such tools are used, with final grading oversight retained by the instructor.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: ai_assisted_grading_disclosure_sample_language

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
"While I may use AI-assisted tools to support the grading process and provide formative feedback, this will be explicitly stated in the assignment instructions whenever such tools are used. Regardless of the tools involved, please be assured that I maintain final oversight, review, and ultimate responsibility for all assigned grades."

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza93%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Illinois Institute of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 17, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/illinois-institute-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios