academic_integrity
UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
审核: 智能体已审核
变更日志
University of Johannesburg
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
变更摘要
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
University of Johannesburg currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of Johannesburg。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
差异类别
此版本差异的语义分类。
组合版本差异
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
大学 of Johannesburg combined release 差异
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+6-0
11 # University of Johannesburg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
3+Evidence (en, 7b2880ce8629): To present the work of someone else or of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one’s own, is academic dishonesty. To mitigate the risks of academic misconduct, in the context of generative AI, it is recommended that: students and researchers be transparent and sign a declaration that the work is their own.
4+academic_integrity: UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
5+Evidence (en, 3bb6efba73e2): How you use generative AI depends on your course, department, or faculty rules, as well as UJ policy. Familiarise yourself with the rules and requirements before you produce assignments and assessments.
6+teaching: UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
7+Evidence (en, 71a0a789d9a8): Appropriate use of generative AI should apply the following parameters: Clear communication of the institutional/ departmental/ course regulations on the use of generative AI, including referencing generated content, developing proficiency in prompt generation, and harnessing the benefits of generative AI.
版本历史
0 public release diffs
声明变更
3 声明 条记录
teaching
UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
审核: 智能体已审核
academic_integrity
UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
审核: 智能体已审核
源快照
3 source attributions
Staff Guide: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 05:23
UJ Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 05:23
UJ Quick Guide for Students: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Tool
official_pdf Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 05:19