academic_integrity
UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Johannesburg
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Johannesburg currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
University of Johannesburg current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+6-0
11 # University of Johannesburg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
3+Evidence (en, 7b2880ce8629): To present the work of someone else or of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one’s own, is academic dishonesty. To mitigate the risks of academic misconduct, in the context of generative AI, it is recommended that: students and researchers be transparent and sign a declaration that the work is their own.
4+academic_integrity: UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
5+Evidence (en, 3bb6efba73e2): How you use generative AI depends on your course, department, or faculty rules, as well as UJ policy. Familiarise yourself with the rules and requirements before you produce assignments and assessments.
6+teaching: UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
7+Evidence (en, 71a0a789d9a8): Appropriate use of generative AI should apply the following parameters: Clear communication of the institutional/ departmental/ course regulations on the use of generative AI, including referencing generated content, developing proficiency in prompt generation, and harnessing the benefits of generative AI.
Claim changes
3 claim records
teaching
UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
Staff Guide: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
UJ Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
UJ Quick Guide for Students: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Tool
official_pdf checked May 16, 2026