University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Johannesburg, South Africa Last checked

University of Johannesburg

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?Conditional in this scopeDo I need to disclose AI use?Required in this scopeCan I upload sensitive data?Evidence gap or scope limitsWhich tools can I access?Evidence gap or scope limits
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional in this scope

Follow your course, department or faculty rules. The 2025 policy requires transparent, responsible AI use; it does not grant blanket assessment permission.

Official source ↗

Exams

Evidence gap or scope limits

An exam-specific AI permission rule was not established. Follow the instructions for the actual exam.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required in this scope

Declare any and all GAI use. The policy separately addresses signed declarations for written submissions and affidavits for assessed masters or doctoral research.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Evidence gap or scope limits

These sources do not establish a complete rule for entering personal, confidential or research data into AI.

Institutional tools

Evidence gap or scope limits

No current institutional AI-tool entitlement was established in this audit.

Research and publication

Required in this scope

Assessed masters or doctoral research must be accompanied by an affidavit under the 2025 policy; AI use must be transparent.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Restrictions in this scope

AI use lacking the policy’s responsible-use characteristics may constitute misconduct. AI detectors are currently not recommended because of validity and reliability concerns.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Required in this scope

Module staff must ensure signed declarations accompany written submissions; communicate the applicable course rules.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Evidence gap or scope limits

A current AI procurement and security approval workflow was not established.

Before you submit

Do

  • Declare any and all use of generative AI.
    Requirement in this scope

Don’t

  • Do not present AI-generated work as your own.
    Requirement in this scope
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

University of Johannesburg

Use the source-specific audience, assessment and publication limits below. Institution-wide policy review remains PARTIAL.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 1

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-27.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

3

Official sources

3 official URLs; 3 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Staff Guide: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research

www.uj.ac.za

University official source

uj.ac.za

Hash and captured version

Staff Guide: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research · 2026-05-16T05:23:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

71a0a789d9a83ee75461cf4bdae6d80207c06ae02a1ea747591cd9385eeea2ba

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

UJ Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research

www.uj.ac.za

University official source

uj.ac.za

Hash and captured version

UJ Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research · 2026-05-16T05:23:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

7b2880ce8629bb364ffb084039bab0f526d1632d9718e00c560ff28e3be6d448

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

UJ Quick Guide for Students: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Tool

www.uj.ac.za

University official source

uj.ac.za

Hash and captured version

UJ Quick Guide for Students: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Tool · 2026-05-16T05:19:30.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3bb6efba73e2b30a475b8c80807062f5d4900bfa9a6228ad4723083f0a2d5ca5

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Institution-wide semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Private historical objects and every new requirement are not automatically accepted by public-Claim review.
  • New evidence retains original bytes where obtained; other items are reviewer excerpts or historical snapshots and do not establish full original documents.
  • Unchanged public APIs, snapshots, MCP, history and tool records do not adopt this local candidate.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Follow your course, department or faculty rules. The 2025 policy requires transparent, responsible AI use; it does not grant blanket assessment permission.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Declare any and all GAI use. The policy separately addresses signed declarations for written submissions and affidavits for assessed masters or doctoral research.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        These sources do not establish a complete rule for entering personal, confidential or research data into AI.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        No current institutional AI-tool entitlement was established in this audit.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        An exam-specific AI permission rule was not established. Follow the instructions for the actual exam.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Assessed masters or doctoral research must be accompanied by an affidavit under the 2025 policy; AI use must be transparent.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        AI use lacking the policy’s responsible-use characteristics may constitute misconduct. AI detectors are currently not recommended because of validity and reliability concerns.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Module staff must ensure signed declarations accompany written submissions; communicate the applicable course rules.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        A current AI procurement and security approval workflow was not established.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        3 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        University of Johannesburg AI Policy