Johannesburg, South Africa

University of Johannesburg

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources3Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-johannesburg.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

University of Johannesburg has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_generated_work_presented_as_own_is_academic_dishonesty

Original evidence

Evidence 1
To present the work of someone else or of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one’s own, is academic dishonesty. To mitigate the risks of academic misconduct, in the context of generative AI, it is recommended that: students and researchers be transparent and sign a declaration that the work is their own.

Academic Integrity

UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: students_must_check_course_and_policy_requirements

Original evidence

Evidence 1
How you use generative AI depends on your course, department, or faculty rules, as well as UJ policy. Familiarise yourself with the rules and requirements before you produce assignments and assessments.

Teaching

UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: staff_guidance_clear_communication_of_ai_rules

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Appropriate use of generative AI should apply the following parameters: Clear communication of the institutional/ departmental/ course regulations on the use of generative AI, including referencing generated content, developing proficiency in prompt generation, and harnessing the benefits of generative AI.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities