academic_integrity
UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Johannesburg currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
3 claim records
UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
3 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:23 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:23 AM
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:19 AM