academic_integrity
UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Journal des modifications
University of Johannesburg
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Résumé des modifications
Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.
University of Johannesburg currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mai 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour University of Johannesburg. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.
Aucune ligne de différence de politique entre les versions n'est encore enregistrée pour cette université. La page suit toujours les affirmations actuelles étayées par des sources, les attributions de sources officielles, l'état d'examen, la fraîcheur des sources et les JSON publics pour la découverte et la citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.
Catégories de différences
Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.
Différentiel de version combinée
Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.
différentiel Université of Johannesburg combined release
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+6-0
11 # University of Johannesburg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
3+Evidence (en, 7b2880ce8629): To present the work of someone else or of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one’s own, is academic dishonesty. To mitigate the risks of academic misconduct, in the context of generative AI, it is recommended that: students and researchers be transparent and sign a declaration that the work is their own.
4+academic_integrity: UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
5+Evidence (en, 3bb6efba73e2): How you use generative AI depends on your course, department, or faculty rules, as well as UJ policy. Familiarise yourself with the rules and requirements before you produce assignments and assessments.
6+teaching: UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
7+Evidence (en, 71a0a789d9a8): Appropriate use of generative AI should apply the following parameters: Clear communication of the institutional/ departmental/ course regulations on the use of generative AI, including referencing generated content, developing proficiency in prompt generation, and harnessing the benefits of generative AI.
Historique des versions
0 public release diffs
Modifications d'affirmations
3 Affirmation enregistrements
teaching
UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
academic_integrity
UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Instantanés source
3 source attributions
Staff Guide: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 mai 2026, 05:23
UJ Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 mai 2026, 05:23
UJ Quick Guide for Students: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Tool
official_pdf Tracker checked at 16 mai 2026, 05:19