public-release-20260715-005
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne public-release-20260715-005 差异
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 3 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
8 声明 条记录
Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
EPFL Chatbot is listed for EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
aiaiapps is listed for EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
EPFL advises students not to input confidential, private or personal information into generative AI tools. When using generative AI tools, students are sharing data with private companies and lose control over it.
EPFL requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in assessment work. EPFL rules (Lex 1.3.3, Article 4) require that all assessment material that is not the student's personal and original contribution must be recognizable as such.
EPFL recommends that teachers make explicit to students what AI use is not legitimate in a course and what rules accompany AI tool use.
EPFL considers the use of AI-generated content in assignments without proper attribution as AI plagiarism. Tools that detect AI-generated content are not admissible as stand-alone evidence of AI plagiarism due to high risk of false positives.
EPFL guidance says enterprise licenses such as Microsoft 365 Copilot via EPFL account are currently not a secure solution for processing regulated data because EPFL has not signed a data processing agreement guaranteeing aligned data protection measures.
8 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月15日 20:06
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月10日 15:10
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月10日 15:10
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月10日 15:10
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月10日 15:10
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月15日 20:07
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月10日 15:10
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月10日 15:10