Change log

EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 10, 2026Last changedMay 10, 2026Claims5Sources6Releasepublic-release-20260526-003

University page Public JSON

EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 10, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

5 claim records

privacy

EPFL advises students not to input confidential, private or personal information into generative AI tools. When using generative AI tools, students are sharing data with private companies and lose control over it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

EPFL requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in assessment work. EPFL rules (Lex 1.3.3, Article 4) require that all assessment material that is not the student's personal and original contribution must be recognizable as such.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

EPFL recommends that teachers make explicit to students what AI use is not legitimate in a course and what rules accompany AI tool use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

EPFL considers the use of AI-generated content in assignments without proper attribution as AI plagiarism. Tools that detect AI-generated content are not admissible as stand-alone evidence of AI plagiarism due to high risk of false positives.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

EPFL guidance says enterprise licenses such as Microsoft 365 Copilot via EPFL account are currently not a secure solution for processing regulated data because EPFL has not signed a data processing agreement guaranteeing aligned data protection measures.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen