privacy
UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
審閱: 代理已審閱
變更紀錄
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
變更摘要
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
5 條當前主張；1 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 Universidade Católica Portuguesa。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
差異類別
此次版本差異的語意分類。
已記錄的文本比對
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
發布歷程
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
當前 Claim 記錄
現行主張紀錄：5。
academic_integrity
For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
審閱: 代理已審閱
ai_tool_treatment
UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
審閱: 代理已審閱
academic_integrity
UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
審閱: 代理已審閱
teaching
In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
審閱: 代理已審閱
來源快照
官方來源紀錄：1。
Politica de integridade academica e cientifica: Carta de Principios no uso de IA
official_pdf 追蹤器檢查於 May 20, 2026, 2:00 AM