Registro de cambios

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteÚltima verificación20 may 2026Último cambio20 may 2026Afirmaciones5Fuentes1Registros de versiones0

Página universitaria JSON público Informe mensual Índice universitario

Universidade Católica Portuguesa currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: 20 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

11 # Universidade Católica Portuguesa AI policy record
2+privacy: UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
3+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Respeito pelo material protegido por direitos de autor, dados pessoais e informacoes confidenciais (incluindo propriedade intelectual nao protegida), nao os exportando para plataformas geridas por entidades externas (servidores e servicos cloud nao licenciados pela UCP).
4+academic_integrity: For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
5+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os documentos (teses, ensaios ou outros) apresentados para avaliacao ou discussao devem resultar do trabalho pessoal, apresentando as suas ideias, argumentos e pontos de vista. E evidente que um texto que e inteiramente produzido pela IA atraves de uma simples serie de instrucoes nao pode ser considerado como trabalho proprio.
6+ai_tool_treatment: UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
7+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os professores, estudantes e investigadores tem a obrigacao de serem transparentes quanto a utilizacao que fazem da IA generativa na producao de materiais academicos, por exemplo, em materiais utilizados para efeitos de avaliacao e progressao academica.
8+academic_integrity: UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
9+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os professores, estudantes e investigadores sao responsaveis pelos materiais que produzem utilizando ferramentas de IA e, por conseguinte, tem a obrigacao de verificar se as informacoes e as fontes utilizadas nos seus materiais sao fiaveis e verdadeiras.
10+teaching: In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
11+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): No contexto do ensino os estudantes devem, em apendice ao trabalho escrito, explicar o processo que deu origem aos elementos ou raciocinios induzidos pela IA. Caso nao seja possivel incluir esta explicacao no proprio texto, recomenda-se uma discussao oral do texto como elemento complementar de avaliacao.

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

5 Afirmación registros

privacy

UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomaspt

academic_integrity

For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomaspt

ai_tool_treatment

UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomaspt

academic_integrity

UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomaspt

teaching

In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%Evidencia1Idiomaspt

Instantáneas de origen

1 atribución de la fuente

Politica de integridade academica e cientifica: Carta de Principios no uso de IA

official_pdf Tracker checked at 20 may 2026, 2:00

URL de origen: https://www.ucp.pt/media/58031/file
Hash de instantánea: 5670a767386bf1cadcb6f68f455506bc67115fc899650f0211d1f1c8470d86c0

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

Resumen de cambios

Categorías de diferencias

Diferencias de versión combinadas